Andrew MacGregor Marshall

Andrew MacGregor Marshall
Born 25 March 1971 (1971-03-25) (age 45)
Occupation Journalist
Ethnicity Scottish
Alma mater University of Cambridge

Andrew MacGregor Marshall (born 25 March 1971) is a Scottish journalist, writer focusing on conflict, politics, crime mainly in Asia and the Middle East. In June 2011, he resigned from Reuters in controversial circumstances after the news agency refused to publish exclusive stories he was writing on the Thai monarchy. His 2014 book A Kingdom in Crisis[1] was banned in Thailand[2] and a prominent Thai royalist made a formal complaint to police accusing Marshall of several crimes including lèse majesté.[3]

Career

Marshall was a correspondent for Reuters for 17 years, covering political upheaval in Thailand and the conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. In 2000, he was named Reuters' Deputy Bureau Chief in Bangkok. He was Reuters' Baghdad bureau chief from 2003 to 2005 as a violent insurgency gripped Iraq, and was Reuters' managing editor for the Middle East from 2006 to 2008. From 2008 he was based in Singapore as a political risk analyst and emerging markets editor. He resigned from Reuters in June 2011 when the agency refused to publish a set of articles about Thailand's monarchy he authored based on his analysis of leaked U.S. diplomatic cables.[4]

#thaistory controversy

In June 2011 Marshall announced he had resigned from Reuters to publish a set of stories about Thailand that the news agency had refused to run. Later the same month he published the material himself. Entitled "Thailand's Moment of Truth", his study analysed the role of the monarchy in Thai politics and included references to hundreds of leaked U.S. diplomatic cables. The cables were also later released by WikiLeaks. Thailand has harsh lese majeste laws that criminalize criticism of the royal family, and journalists covering the country have tended to follow a policy of self-censorship, refraining from any comment on the monarchy that could be deemed critical. Marshall's study, usually referred to by its Twitter hashtag #thaistory, used evidence from the cables to argue the monarchy played a central political role in Thailand which had never been properly reported.[5]

In an article for the Independent newspaper, Marshall noted that his publication of #thaistory meant he would face jail if he ever returned to Thailand, and that he understood Reuters' refusal to publish the material given the risks to its staff and business in Thailand if it offended the monarchy.[6] Reuters gave a different explanation, telling The Times and The Independent that the story didn't "work" in the format in which it was delivered, that they had questions regarding length, sourcing, objectivity, and legal issues, and that Marshall "was not participating in the normal editing process."[7]

Marshall's #thaistory generated significant comment and debate. Nicholas Farrelly, a fellow at the Australian National University, wrote that the initial instalments published "have quickly become online sensations", adding "his insights will reverberate in Thai analytical circles for many years to come".[8] Joshua Kurlantzick, Southeast Asia fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, said Marshall's work was "perhaps the biggest bombshell of reportage on Thailand in decades".[9] Graeme Dobell of the Lowy Institute for International Policy described #thaistory as "journalism of the highest order"[10] and Pavin Chachavalpongpun of the Institute of South East Asian Studies wrote: "Marshall has undoubtedly helped push the boundaries much further as one looks at the present state of the Thai monarchy."[11] Richard Lloyd Parry, Asia editor for The Times newspaper, said #thaistory was "a profound study, beyond mere journalism".[12]

The Thai authorities have a policy of not officially acknowledging the existence of controversial Wikileaks cables, and so did not comment on #thaistory, but Thanong Khanthong, managing editor of the generally pro-establishment Nation newspaper, claimed it was part of an international plot to destabilize Thailand.[13]

Death of King Ananda Mahidol

Marshall has done extensive research into the mysterious shooting of Ananda Mahidol, King Rama VIII of Thailand, on 9 June 1946. He argues that the evidence overwhelmingly suggests Bhumibol Adulyadej killed his brother, probably accidentally, and this was covered up to enable Bhumibol to become king.[14]

A Kingdom in Crisis

Marshall's book A Kingdom in Crisis was published by Zed Books in October 2014.

Death of King Bhumipol

Marshall reported Thai King Bhumipol's death on 13 October 2016, hours before the official announcement by the royal palace.[15][16]

References

  1. Marshall, Andrew MacGregor (9 October 2014). A Kingdom in Crisis: Thailand's Struggle for Democracy in the Twenty-First Century. London: Zed Books. ISBN 9781783600588.
  2. "Thai police bans book criticizing monarchy". AP. Nov 13, 2014. Retrieved 16 December 2014.
  3. "Thai royalist files lèse majesté complaint against Andrew McGregor Marshall". Prachatai. Dec 10, 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  4. Marshall, Andrew MacGregor (23 June 2011). "Why I decided to jeopardise my career and publish secrets". The Independent.
  5. Andrew MacGregor Marshall, "Thailand's Moment of Truth", published 23 June 2011
  6. Andrew MacGregor Marshall, "Why I decided to jeopardise my career and publish secrets", The Independent, 23 June 2011
  7. Brian Rex, "Monarchy in spotlight: tensions that threaten new turmoil in Thailand" , The Independent, 23 June 2011
  8. Nicholas Farrelly, "Why criticising the Thai royal family might be bad for your career", The Conversation, 6 July 2011
  9. Joshua Kurlantzick, "Bombshell Report on Thailand May Open Debate on Monarchy", 27 June 2011
  10. Graeme Dobell, "The danger of a Thai civil war", 5 July 2011
  11. Pavin Chachavalpongpun, "Thailand’s Yingluck Factor: Can the Lady In Red Lead?" Archived January 4, 2012, at the Wayback Machine., Indonesian Strategic Review, August 2011
  12. Nicholas Farrelly, "Andrew Marshall's Thai Story", New Mandala, 23 June 2011
  13. Thanong Khanthong, "More Confrontation is Inevitable", The Nation, 1 July 2011
  14. Andrew MacGregor Marshall, "Thailand's Saddest Secret", 6 March 2013
  15. Stan, Filip. "Regele Thailandei a murit. A fost cel mai longeviv monarh, cu o domnie de peste 70 de ani". România TV. Retrieved 13 October 2016.
  16. "As Thais keep vigil, rumors of King Bhumibol Adulyadej's death spread online". Asian Correspondent. Retrieved 13 October 2016.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/14/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.