Bear's Son Tale

Bear's Son Tales are a group of tales found from Europe, Asia and North America, with over 200 known versions,[1] first isolated and identified as such by Friedrich Panzer.[2]

The best known of these tales is Beowulf.[3] Others are the story of Bödvar Bjarki in material about Hrólf Kraki and an incident in the Grettis saga, while King Arthur,[4] and Odysseus in the cave of Polyphemus, can also be related to the theme.

Core characteristics

Among the core characteristics of the story are a hero who was a feral child, raised by or descended from a bear, with bear-like attributes; a monster to be defeated, usually after others fail in the attempt; and a descent in pursuit into a netherworld or underground cavern.[5] In some stories the monster defeats the hero instead.

Other frequently associated elements are a captive maiden, treason by a close friend or ally of the hero, magical weapons or talismans, and a smith as protective or persecutory figure.[6]

The Bear's Son and Beowulf

J. R. R. Tolkien was very interested in the idea of the bear-son folktale underlying Beowulf,[7] and pointed to several minor but illuminating characteristics supporting the assumption: Beowulf's uncouthness and appetite, the strength of his grip, and his refusal to use weapons against Grendel.[8] He also saw Unferth as a link between folktale and legend, his (covert) roles as smith and treacherous friend standing behind his gift to Beowulf of the "hafted blade" that fails.[9]

Critics of Panzer's thesis have argued however that many of the incidents he sees as specific to the Bear's Son Story are in fact generic folktale elements; and that a closer analogue to Beowulf is to be found in Celtic mythology and the story of the 'Monstrous Arm'.[10]

Psychoanalytic interpretations

For psychoanalysis, the bear-parents represent the parents seen in their animal (sexual) guise[11] - the bear as the dark, bestial aspect of the parental archetype.[12] Their offspring, represented by Tolkien in Sellic Spell as "a surly, lumpish boy...slow to learn the speech of the land",[13] is the undersocialised child. And in the underground struggle, Géza Róheim argued, we find a representation of the primal scene, as encapsulated in the infantile unconscious.[14]

See also

References

  1. Fjalldal, Magnús (1998). The long arm of coincidence: the frustrated connection between Beowulf and Grettis saga. University of Toronto Press. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-8020-4301-6.
  2. S. Mitchell, Heroic Sagas and Ballads (1991) p. 41
  3. Stitt, J. Michael (1992). Beowulf and the bear's son: epic, saga, and fairytale in northern Germanic tradition. Garland Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8240-7440-1.
  4. G. Anderson, King Arthur in Antiquity (2004) p. 43
  5. J. Vickrey, Beowulf and the Illusion of History (2009) p. 23
  6. Géza Róheim, Fire in the Dragon (1992) p. 72
  7. John D. Rateliff, Mr Baggins (London 2007) p. 256
  8. C. Tolkien ed, J. R. R. Tolkien: Beowulf (London 2015) p. 206-7, p. 241-2 and p. 235
  9. C. Tolkien ed, J. R. R. Tolkien: Beowulf (London 2015) p. 208-11, and p. 381
  10. M. Puhvel, Beowulf and the Celtic Tradition (2010) p. 4-5
  11. M. Wolfenstein, Children's Humour (1954) p. 151-6
  12. C. Jung, the Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (London 1990) p. 195
  13. C. Tolkien ed, J. R. R. Tolkien: Beowulf (London 2015) p. 360
  14. Géza Róheim, Fire in the Dragon (1992) p. 71

Further Reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.