Bernard Kettlewell

Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell
Born (1907-02-24)24 February 1907
Howden, Yorkshire, England
Died 11 May 1979(1979-05-11) (aged 72)
Oxford
Resting place Steeple Barton
51°55′19″N 1°21′04″W / 51.922°N 1.351°W / 51.922; -1.351
Nationality British
Fields Medicine, zoology
Institutions St Bartholomew's Hospital
St. Luke's Hospital
Woking War Hospital
Cape Town University
Oxford University
Alma mater Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Academic advisors E. B. Ford
Known for Peppered moth evolution
Influences Michael Majerus
Bruce Grant

Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell (24 February 1907 – 11 May 1979)[1] was a British geneticist, lepidopterist and medical doctor, who performed research on the influence of industrial melanism on peppered moth (Biston betularia) colouration, showing why moths are darker in polluted areas. This experiment is cited as a classic example of natural selection.[2] After live video record of the experiment with Niko Tinbergen, Sewall Wright called the study as "the clearest case in which a conspicuous evolutionary process has actually been observed."[3]

Early life

Kettlewell was born in Howden, Yorkshire, and educated at Charterhouse School. During 1926 he studied medicine and zoology at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. During 1929 he began clinical training at St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, then during 1935 joined a general medical practice in Cranleigh, Surrey. He also worked as an anesthetist at St. Luke's Hospital, Guildford. During World War II, from 1939 to 1945, he worked for the Emergency Medical Service at Woking War Hospital.[4]

He emigrated to South Africa during 1949, and from then until 1954 was a researcher at the International Locust Control Centre at Cape Town University, investigating methods of locust control and going on expeditions to the Kalahari Desert, the Knysna Forest, the Belgian Congo and Mozambique.[4]

During 1952 he was appointed to a Nuffield Research Fellowship in the Department of Genetics of the Department of Zoology at Oxford University. Until 1954 he divided his time between South Africa and Oxford, then he gained the position of Senior Research Officer of the Department of Genetics and spent the rest of his career in Oxford as a genetics researcher.[4] He was assigned to investigate peppered moth evolution under the supervisor of E. B. Ford.[1]

Peppered moth experiments

His grant was to study industrial melanism in general, and in particular the peppered moth Biston betularia which had been studied by William Bateson during the 1890s. Kettlewell's research from three surveys between 1952 and 1972 seemed to show a static pattern with a high frequency of the dark-coloured carbonaria phenotype in industrial regions, and the light coloured typica moths the most common in more rural areas. In the first of Kettlewell's experiments moths were released into an aviary to observe how insectivorous birds reacted. He showed that the birds ate the moths, and found that if the camouflage of the moths made them difficult for him to see against a matching background, the birds too had difficulty in finding the moths.[5] Most famously he then performed experiments involving releasing and then recapturing marked moths in polluted woodlands in Birmingham, and in unpolluted rural woods at Deanend Wood, Dorset, England.[6] He demonstrated experimentally the efficiency of natural selection as an evolutionary force: light-coloured moths are more conspicuous than dark-coloured ones in industrial areas, where the vegetation is darkened by pollution, and are therefore easier prey for birds, but are less conspicuous in unpolluted rural areas, where the vegetation is lighter in colour, and therefore survive predation better. His experiment resulted in better understanding of industrial melanism and its effects on the evolution of species.

Criticism

J.B.S. Haldane was of the opinion that Kettlewell had attempted to capitalize on Haldane's own observations, made as early as 1924, of the statistical probability of rate of change from light to melanic forms of the peppered moth. In 1961, Haldane and his graduate student (and later wife) Helen Spurway told Canadian lepidopterist Gary Botting that they questioned Kettlewell's data since it too "nicely" approximated Haldane's 1924 statistical calculations. Botting and Haldane at that time shared the opinion that some genetic mechanism other than bird predation was at work.[7][8]

The major argument was made by Theodore David Sargent, professor of zoology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He reported that during 1965-1969 he attempted to perform similar experiment, and found that birds did not have preference on moth on either black or white tree trunks.[9][10] He suspected that Kettlewell trained the birds to pick moths on tree trunk, where they were not normally present.[3]

Of Moths and Men

Further criticism of Kettlewell's peppered moth research came from Judith Hooper in her 2002 book Of Moths and Men.[11] who called it "the slam-dunk of natural selection".[12] The book claims that Kettlewell's field notes could never be found and his experiments were a fraud. Stressing on Sargent's scepticism that the experimental photographs of the moths were faked by planting dead moths on a log. It also mentions, mostly for shock value, that Kettlewell and Spurway were known to catch live moths and eat them whole. It calls Ford a Darwinian zealot[13] who exploited the servitude Kettlewell to get him his desired experimental results. Above all, it denigrates Kettlewell as "not an intellectual", and accuses in general of all scientists for credulous and biased acceptance of evolution.[14] The book was widely quoted by creationists,[15] and the European Molecular Biology Organization's review described it as "Hooper's exhilarating account of the public and private lives of an opinionated and powerful group of evolutionists, who contributed to this shameful episode in the study of evolution."[16]

Scientists have refuted her various allegations.[17][18][19] David W Rudge critically summarised that "none of Hooper's arguments is found to withstand careful scrutiny,"[20] and that all "these charges are baseless and stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of science as a process."[21]

Further research vindicating Kettlewell's work

Kettlewell's experiments have been vindicated by elaborate research,[22] and the genetic details of the evolutionary process established.[23][24][25]

Michael Majerus carried out extensive experiments, examining moths in the wild, to reexamine the findings of Kettlewell's experiments in the light of subsequent questions. His work, published posthumously in 2012, provided new data which answered criticisms and validated Kettlewell's methodology. Their analysis reaffirmed Kettlewell's conclusion that differential selection by birds using their eyesight to find prey was sufficient to explain the changes in melanism, and that this demonstrated the effectiveness of natural selection as an evolutionary force.[22]

Death

Consequent of vigorous field research, Kettlewell suffered from bronchitis, pneumonia, pleurisy and flu, along with heart problems. He fell off a birch tree in 1978 while conducting field collection and broke his back. He never recovered from the injury. On 11 May 1979, he died, allegedly of an accidental overdose of painkiller.[1]

Awards and honours

References

  1. 1 2 3 Raeburn, Paul (25 August 2002). "The Moth That Failed". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 November 2014.
  2. ↑ Rudge, David W. (2005). "The Beauty of Kettlewell's Classic Experimental Demonstration of Natural Selection". BioScience. 55 (4): 369–375. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0369:TBOKCE]2.0.CO;2.
  3. 1 2 Rice, Stanley A. (2007). Encyclopedia of Evolution. New York: Facts On File, Inc. p. 308. ISBN 978-1-4381-1005-9.
  4. 1 2 3 4 "Biographical Data on Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell - Wolfson College". Retrieved 2007-09-10.
  5. ↑ Prof. Laurence Cook (2003). "The Peppered Moth". The Melanic Peppered Moth, Seminar to Post Grad Students. Manchester Metropolitan University. Archived from the original on 2007-07-02. Retrieved 2007-09-10.
  6. ↑ "The theory of natural selection (part 1)". Blackwell Publishing. Archived from the original on 2007-09-26. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  7. ↑ "Preface," in Heather and Gary Botting,The Orwellian World of Jehovah's Witnesses (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984
  8. ↑ Tihemme Gagnon, "Introduction," Streaking! The Collected Poems of Gary Botting (Miami: Strategic, 2013
  9. ↑ Sargent, TD (1968). "Cryptic moths: effects on background selections of painting the circumocular scales.". Science. 159 (3810): 100–1. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.100. PMID 5634373.
  10. ↑ Sargent, T. D. (1969). "Background Selections of the Pale and Melanic Forms of the Cryptic Moth, Phigalia titea (Cramer)". Nature. 222 (5193): 585–586. doi:10.1038/222585b0.
  11. ↑ Hooper, Judith (2002). Of Moths and Men : Intrigue, Tragedy & the Peppered Moth. New York: Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-32525-6.
  12. ↑ Kenney, Michael (22 October 2002). "Of dark moths, men and evolution". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  13. ↑ "Of Moths and Men". W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  14. ↑ Smith, Peter D (11 May 2002). "Of Moths and Men: Intrigue, Tragedy & the Peppered Moth". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  15. ↑ "Of moths and men". The Independent. 4 September 2003. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
  16. ↑ Dover, Gabby (2003). "Mothbusters". EMBO Reports. 4 (3): 235–235. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor778. PMC 1315906Freely accessible.
  17. ↑ Cook, LM (2003). "The rise and fall of the Carbonaria form of the peppered moth.". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 78 (4): 399–417. doi:10.1086/378925. PMID 14737825.
  18. ↑ Grant B. S. (2002), "Sour grapes of wrath", Science, 297: 940–941, doi:10.1126/science.1073593
  19. ↑ Majerus, Michael E.N. (2005). "The peppered moth: decline of a Darwinian disciple". In Fellowes, Mark; Holloway, Graham; Rolf, Jens. Insect Evolutionary Ecology. Wallingford, Oxon: CABI Publishing. pp. 375–377. ISBN 978-1-84593-140-7.
  20. ↑ Rudge, D. W. (2005). "Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence". Public Understanding of Science. 14 (3): 249–268. doi:10.1177/0963662505052890. PMID 16240545.
  21. ↑ Rudge, David W. (2006). "Myths about moths: a study in contrasts". Endeavour. 30 (1): 19–23. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.01.005. PMID 16549216.
  22. 1 2 Cook, L. M.; Grant, B. S.; Saccheri, I. J.; Mallet, J. (2012). "Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus". Biology Letters. 8 (4): 609–612. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.1136. PMC 3391436Freely accessible. PMID 22319093.
  23. ↑ van't Hof, A. E.; Edmonds, N.; Dalikova, M.; Marec, F.; Saccheri, I. J. (2011). "Industrial Melanism in British Peppered Moths Has a Singular and Recent Mutational Origin". Science. 332 (6032): 958–960. doi:10.1126/science.1203043. PMID 21493823.
  24. ↑ Cook, L M; Saccheri, I J (2012). "The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study". Heredity. 110 (3): 207–212. doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.92. PMC 3668657Freely accessible. PMID 23211788.
  25. ↑ Van't Hof, A E; Nguyen, P; Dalíková, M; Edmonds, N; Marec, F; Saccheri, I J (2012). "Linkage map of the peppered moth, Biston betularia (Lepidoptera, Geometridae): a model of industrial melanism". Heredity. 110 (3): 283–295. doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.84. PMC 3668655Freely accessible. PMID 23211790.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/31/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.