Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Full case name Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
Citations

509 U.S. 209 (more)

509 U.S. 209, 113 S.Ct. 2578, 125 L.Ed.2d 168
Holding
Brown & Williamson is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because it did not engage in predatory pricing in violation of §2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Souter, Thomas
Dissent Stevens, joined by White, Blackmun
Laws applied
Clayton Act §2

Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court required that an antitrust plaintiff alleging predatory pricing must show not only changes in market conditions adverse to its interests, as a threshold matter, but must show on the merits that (1) the prices complained of are below an appropriate measure of its rival's costs, and (2) that the competitor had a reasonable prospect or a "dangerous probability" of recouping its investment in the alleged scheme.

Holding

An oligopoly's interdependent pricing may provide a means for achieving recoupment, and thus may form the basis of a primary-line injury claim. Predatory pricing schemes, in general, are implausible, and are even more improbable when they require coordinated action among several firms. They are least likely to occur where, as alleged here, the cooperation among firms is tacit, since effective tacit coordination is difficult to achieve.

Since there is a high likelihood that any attempt by one oligopolist to discipline a rival by cutting prices will produce an outbreak of competition; and since a predator's present losses fall on it alone, while the later supracompetitive profits must be shared with every other oligopolist in proportion to its market share, including the intended victim.

Ultimately, Justice Kennedy, held that:

See also

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.