Curb extension

A curb extension marked by darkened tarmac and black posts.

A curb extension (or also neckdown, kerb extension, bulb-out, bump-out, kerb build-out, nib, elephant ear, curb bulge,"curb bulb" and blister) is a traffic calming measure, primarily used to extend the sidewalk, reducing the crossing distance and allowing pedestrians about to cross and approaching vehicle drivers to see each other when vehicles parked in a parking lane would otherwise block visibility.

A curb extension is an angled narrowing of the roadway and a widening of the sidewalk (pavement or footway in UK usage). This is often accompanied by an area of enhanced restrictions (such as a "no stopping" or "no parking" zone) and the appropriate visual reinforcement. This is achieved using painted road markings (e.g. lines, coloured areas, or chevrons), barriers, bollards, or the addition of pavement or street furniture (e.g. planters, lamp standards, or benches).

Curb extensions are often used in combination with other traffic calming measures such as chicanes, speed bumps, or rumble strips, and are frequently sited to "guard" pedestrian crossings. In these cases the "squeeze" effect of the narrowed roadway shortens the exposed distance pedestrians must walk.

Uses

The primary use of curb extensions are to improve visibility of pedestrians and reduce their exposure to motor vehicles.

Curb extensions are also in a number of special circumstances:

Curb extensions are also used when retrofitting existing streets to accommodate congestion charging schemes - hitherto wide (sometimes multi-lane) roads are deliberately narrowed to ensure that the charging equipment can see passing vehicles, and the charging equipment (and often bollards or other barrier devices) are placed in the expanded sidewalk area (to prevent drivers from circumventing the charging system's cameras and detectors).

Design, advantages and disadvantages

The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center advises that curb extensions ought not encroach on travel lanes, bicycle lanes, or shoulders, and should not extend more than 1.8 m (6 ft) from the curb.[2] Some curb extensions are built with the bike lane passing through (making the extension an island, separated from the main sidewalk by a narrow bike lane).

One study has found that pedestrians crossing at curb extensions have to wait for fewer vehicles to pass before a motorist yields to allow them to cross. The study was too small to determine whether other measures of effectiveness, such as percent of pedestrians crossing after a motorist yields, were significant.[3]

Poorly designed curb extensions can pose a hazard to cyclists, as they force cyclists from their position at the road side (or in a roadside bike lane) into the narrowed gap. They can also damage vehicles if the curbs extend too close to traffic lanes.[4]

Curb extensions have not been found to affect the speed of vehicle traffic.[5]

Author Randal O'Toole argues that curb extensions are used to discourage the use of automobiles by reducing the number of lanes available for automobiles. In particular, curb extensions can be used to block turn lanes, forcing turning vehicles to remain with the forward moving traffic.[6] Curb extensions do prevent drivers from using parking lanes or shoulders as right turn lanes.

However, reducing the crossing distance also reduces the time needed to cross the street. This allows a reduction in the length of the pedestrian phase at signalized intersection, and reduces the time needed to yield to pedestrians at stop sign controlled intersections. This at least partially compensated for any loss in vehicle capacity.[7]

Curb extensions complicate drainage. They obstruct the gutter, so a catch basin is needed at the uphill end to keep a puddle from forming. An alternate solution is placing a gap in the curb, allowing the stormwater in the gutter to irrigate a rain garden in the curb extension.[8]

Broadway at 33rd Street, Manhattan.

To facilitate street sweeping, the internal and external curvatures of the extended curb section are moderately graduated.

Retroactively adding curb extensions to older, established communities has been controversial in some instances, due to the installation of the extensions reducing the availability of on-street parking for some properties, particularly in cases where the curb extension has been installed on its own and not in conjunction with a crosswalk.

See also

References

  1. Plemmons, Mark (April 30, 2016). "Neighbors fear speeding traffic on new section of George Liles Parkway". Independent Tribune. Retrieved April 30, 2016.
  2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, "Crossing Enhancements," http://www.walkinginfo.org/engineering/crossings-enhancements.cfm, retrieved 23 June 2010
  3. Randal S. Johnson (July 2005). "Pedestrian Safety Impacts of Curb Extensions: a Case Study" (PDF). Retrieved 5 August 2011.
  4. Albany Times Union "MOTORISTS TAKE HIT ON ROAD PROJECT" July 19, 2004, http://albarchive.merlinone.net/mweb/wmsql.wm.request?oneimage&imageid=6245046 retrieved 29 June 2010
  5. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, "Do curb extensions reduce speeds" Retrieved 23 June 2010
  6. Randal O'Toole "Gridlock"
  7. "Road Diets: Making Streets Slim Down Is Good For Pedestrians, Businesses And Even Traffic," Planetizen, http://www.planetizen.com/node/44645
  8. Sustainable Stormwater Management, http://www.portlandonline.com/BES/index.cfm?c=34598, retrieved 28 April 2010

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.