*-autonomous category

In mathematics, a *-autonomous (read "star-autonomous") category C is a symmetric monoidal closed category equipped with a dualizing object $\bot$.

Definition

Let C be a symmetric monoidal closed category. For any object A and $\bot$, there exists a morphism

$\partial _{{A,\bot }}:A\to (A\Rightarrow \bot )\Rightarrow \bot$

defined as the image by the bijection defining the monoidal closure, of the morphism

${\mathrm {eval}}_{{A,A\Rightarrow \bot }}\circ \gamma _{{A\Rightarrow \bot ,A}}:(A\Rightarrow \bot )\otimes A\to \bot$

An object $\bot$ of the category C is called dualizing when the associated morphism $\partial _{{A,\bot }}$ is an isomorphism for every object A of the category C.

Equivalently, a *-autonomous category is a symmetric monoidal category C together with a functor $(-)^{*}:C^{{{\mathrm {op}}}}\to C$ such that for every object A there is a natural isomorphism $A\cong {A^{*}}^{*}$, and for every three objects A, B and C there is a natural bijection

${\mathrm {Hom}}(A\otimes B,C^{*})\cong {\mathrm {Hom}}(A,(B\otimes C)^{*})$.

The dualizing object of C is then defined by $\bot =I^{*}$.

Properties

Compact closed categories are *-autonomous, with the monoidal unit as the dualizing object. Conversely, if the unit of a *-autonomous category is a dualizing object then there is a canonical family of maps

$A^{*}\otimes B^{*}\to (B\otimes A)^{*}$ .

These are all isomorphisms if and only if the *-autonomous category is compact closed.

Examples

A familiar example is given by matrix theory as finite-dimensional linear algebra, namely the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces over any field k made monoidal with the usual tensor product of vector spaces. The dualizing object is k, the one-dimensional vector space, and dualization corresponds to transposition. Although the category of all vector spaces over k is not *-autonomous, suitable extensions to categories of topological vector spaces can be made *-autonomous.

Various models of linear logic form *-autonomous categories, the earliest of which was Jean-Yves Girard's category of coherence spaces.

The category of complete semilattices with morphisms preserving all joins but not necessarily meets is *-autonomous with dualizer the chain of two elements. A degenerate example (all homsets of cardinality at most one) is given by any Boolean algebra (as a partially ordered set) made monoidal using conjunction for the tensor product and taking 0 as the dualizing object.

An example of a self-dual category that is not *-autonomous is finite linear orders and continuous functions, which has * but is not autonomous: its dualizing object is the two-element chain but there is no tensor product.

The category of sets and their partial injections is self-dual because the converse of the latter is again a partial injection.

The concept of *-autonomous category was introduced by Michael Barr in 1979 in a monograph with that title. Barr defined the notion for the more general situation of V-categories, categories enriched in a symmetric monoidal or autonomous category V. The definition above specializes Barr's definition to the case V = Set of ordinary categories, those whose homobjects form sets (of morphisms). Barr's monograph includes an appendix by his student Po-Hsiang Chu which develops the details of a construction due to Barr showing the existence of nontrivial *-autonomous V-categories for all symmetric monoidal categories V with pullbacks, whose objects became known a decade later as Chu spaces.

Non symmetric case

In a biclosed monoidal category C, not necessarily symmetric, it is still possible to define a dualizing object and then define a *-autonomous category as a biclosed monoidal category with a dualizing object. They are equivalent definitions, as in the symmetric case.

References

• Michael Barr (1979). Springer-Verlag, ed. "*-autonomous Categories". Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 752.
• Michael Barr (1995). "Non-symmetric *-autonomous Categories" (PDF). Theoretical Computer Science. 139: 115–130. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(94)00089-2.
• Michael Barr (1999). "*-autonomous categories: once more around the track" (PDF). Theory and Applications of Categories. 6: 5–24.