Dynamic nuclear polarisation

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP)[1][2][3] results from transferring spin polarization from electrons to nuclei, thereby aligning the nuclear spins to the extent that electron spins are aligned. Note that the alignment of electron spins at a given magnetic field and temperature is described by the Boltzmann distribution under the thermal equilibrium (see figure). It is also possible that those electrons are aligned to a higher degree of order by other preparations of electron spin order such as: chemical reactions (leading to Chemical-Induced DNP, CIDNP), optical pumping and spin injection. DNP is considered one of several techniques for hyperpolarization. DNP can also be induced using unpaired electrons produced by radiation damage in solids.[4][5]

When electron spin polarization deviates from its thermal equilibrium value, polarization transfers between electrons and nuclei can occur spontaneously through electron-nuclear cross relaxation and/or spin-state mixing among electrons and nuclei. For example, the polarization transfer is spontaneous after a homolysis chemical reaction. On the other hand, when the electron spin system is in a thermal equilibrium, the polarization transfer requires continuous microwave irradiation at a frequency close to the corresponding electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) frequency. In particular, mechanisms for the microwave-driven DNP processes are categorized into the Overhauser effect (OE), the solid-effect (SE), the cross-effect (CE) and thermal-mixing (TM).

The first DNP experiments were performed in the early 1950s at low magnetic fields[6][7] but until recently the technique was of limited applicability for high-frequency, high-field NMR spectroscopy, because of the lack of microwave (or terahertz) sources operating at the appropriate frequency. Today such sources are available as turn-key instruments, making DNP a valuable and indispensable method especially in the field of structure determination by high-resolution solid-state NMR spectroscopy[8][9][10]

DNP Mechanisms

The Overhauser Effect

DNP was first realized using the concept of the Overhauser effect, which is the perturbation of nuclear spin level populations observed in metals and free radicals when electron spin transitions are saturated by the microwave irradiation. This effect relies on stochastic interactions between an electron and a nucleus. The 'dynamic' initially meant to highlight the time-dependent and random interactions in this polarization transfer process.

The DNP phenomenon was theoretically predicted by Albert Overhauser in 1953[11] and initially drew some criticism from Norman Ramsey, Felix Bloch and other renowned physicists of the time on the grounds of being "thermodynamically improbable". The experimental confirmation by Carver and Slichter as well as an apologetic letter from Ramsey both reached Overhauser in the same year.[12]

The so-called electron-nucleus cross-relaxation, which is responsible for the DNP phenomenon is caused by rotational and translational modulation of the electron-nucleus hyperfine coupling. The theory of this process is based essentially on the second-order time-dependent perturbation theory solution of the von Neumann equation for the spin density matrix.

While the Overhauser effect relies on time-dependent electron-nuclear interactions, the remaining polarizing mechanisms rely on time-independent electron-nuclear and electron-electron interactions.

The solid effect

The simplest spin system exhibiting the SE DNP mechanism is an electron-nucleus spin pair. The Hamiltonian of the system can be written as: H0 = ωeSz + ωnIz + A∙SzIz + B∙SzIx, corresponding, respectively, to the electron and nucleus Zeeman interaction with the external magnetic field, and to the is hyperfine interaction. S and I are the electron and nuclear spin operators in the Zeeman basis (spin 1/2 considered for simplicity), ωe and ωn are the electron and nuclear Larmor frequencies, and A and B are the secular and pseudo-secular parts of the hyperfine interaction. For simplicity we will only consider the case of |A|,|B|<<|ωn|. In such a case A has little effect on the evolution of the spin system. During DNP a MW irradiation is applied at a frequency ωMW and intensity ω1, resulting in a rotating frame Hamiltonian given by: H = ΔωeSz + ωnIz + A∙SzIz + B∙SzIx + ω1Sx, where Δωe=ωe-ωMW. The MW irradiation can excite the electron single quantum transitions ("allowed transitions") when ωMW is close to ωe, resulting in a loss of the electron polarization. In addition, due to the small state mixing caused by the B term of the hyperfine interaction, it is possible to irradiate on the electron-nucleus zero quantum or double quantum ("forbidden") transitions around ωMW = ωe ± ωn, resulting in polarization transfer between the electrons and the nuclei. The effective MW irradiation on these transitions is approximately given by ω1∙B/2ωn.

Static sample Case

In a simple picture of an electron-nucleus two-spin system, the solid effect occurs when a transition involving an electron-nucleus mutual flip (called Zero Quantum or Double Quantum) is excited by a microwave irradiation, in the presence of relaxation. This kind of transition is in general weakly allowed, meaning that the transition moment for the above microwave excitation results from a second-order effect of the electron-nuclear interactions and thus requires stronger microwave power to be significant, and its intensity is decreased by an increase of the external magnetic field B0. As a result, the DNP enhancement from the solid effect scales as B0−2 when all the relaxation parameters are kept constant. Once this transition is excited and the relaxation is acting, the magnetization is spread over the "bulk" nuclei (the major part of the detected nulcei in a NMR experiment) via the nuclear dipole network. This polarizing mechanism is optimal when the exciting microwave frequency shifts up or down by the nuclear Larmor frequency from the electron Larmor frequency in the discussed two-spin system. The direction of frequency shifts corresponds to the sign of DNP enhancements. Solid effect exist in most cases but is more easily observed if the linewidth of the EPR spectrum of involved unpaired electrons is smaller than the nuclear Larmor frequency of the corresponding nuclei.

Magic Angle Spinning Case

In the case of Magic Angle Spinning DNP (MAS-DNP), the mechanism is different but to understand it, a two spins system can still be used. The polarization process of the nucleus still occurs when the microwave irradiation excites the Double Quantum or Zero Quantum transition, but due to the fact that the sample is spinning, this condition is only met for a short time at each rotor cycle (which makes it periodical). The DNP process in that case happens by step and not continuously as in the static case.[13]

The cross effect

Static Case

The cross effect requires two unpaired electrons as the source of high polarization. Without special condition, such a three spins system can only generate a solid effect type of polarization. However, when the resonance frequency of each electron is separated by the nuclear Larmor frequency, and when the two electrons are dipolar coupled, an other mechanism occurs: the cross-effect. In that case, the DNP process is the result of irradiation of an allowed transition (called single quantum) as a result the strength of microwave irradiation is less demanded than that in the solid effect. In practice, the correct EPR frequency separation is accomplished through random orientation of paramagnetic species with g-anisotropy. Since the "frequency" distance between the two electrons should be equal to the Larmor frequency of the targeted nucleus, Cross-Effect can only occur if the inhomogeneously broadened EPR lineshape has a linewidth broader than the nuclear Larmor frequency. Therefore, as this linewidth is proportional to external magnetic field B0, the overall DNP efficiency (or the enhancement of nuclear polarization) scales as B0−1. This remains true as long as the relaxation times remain constant. Usually going to higher field leads to longer nuclear relaxation times and this may partially compensate for the line broadening reduction. In practice, in a glassy sample, the probability of having two dipolarly coupled electrons separated by the Larmor frequency is very scarce. Nonetheless this mechanism is so efficient that it can be experimentally observed alone or in addition to the Solid-Effect.

Magic Angle Spinning Case

As in the static case, the MAS-DNP mechanism of Cross effect is deeply modified due to the time dependent energy level. By taking a simple three spin system, it has been demonstrated that the Cross-Effect mechanism is different in the Static and MAS case. The Cross Effect is the result of very fast multi-step process involving EPR single quantum transition, electron dipolar anti-crossing and Cross Effect degeneracy conditions. In the most simple case the MAS-DNP mechanism can be explained by the combination of a single quantum transition followed by the Cross-Effect degeneracy condition, or by the electron-dipolar anti-crossing followed by the Cross-Effect degeneracy condition.[13] [14]

This in turn change dramatically the CE dependence over the static magnetic field which doesn't scale like B0−1 and makes it much more efficient than the solid effect.[14]

Thermal mixing

Thermal mixing is an energy exchange phenomena between the electron spin ensemble and the nuclear spin, which can be thought of as using multiple electron spins to provide hyper nuclear polarization. Note that the electron spin ensemble acts as a whole because of stronger inter-electron interactions. The strong interactions lead to a homogeneously broadened EPR lineshape of the involved paramagnetic species. The linewidth is optimized for polarization transfer from electrons to nuclei, when it is close to the nuclear Larmor frequency. The optimization is related to an embedded three-spin (electron-electron-nucleus) process that mutually flips the coupled three spins under the energy conservation (mainly) of the Zeeman interactions. Due to the inhomogeneous component of the associated EPR lineshape, the DNP enhancement by this mechanism also scales as B0−1.

References

  1. ↑ Goldman, Maurice (1970). Spin Temperature and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Solids. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-851251-1.
  2. ↑ A. Abragam, M. Goldman; Goldman (1976). "Principles of Dynamic Nuclear Polarization". Reports on Progress in Physics. 41 (3): 395–467. Bibcode:1978RPPh...41..395A. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/41/3/002.
  3. ↑ J. Puebla; E.A. Chekhovich; M. Hopkinson; P. Senellart; A. Lemaitre; M.S. Skolnick; A.I. Tartakovskii (2013). "Dynamic nuclear polarization in InGaAs/GaAs and GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots under non-resonant ultra-low power optical excitation". Phys. Rev. B. 88 (4): 9. arXiv:1306.0469Freely accessible. Bibcode:2013PhRvB..88d5306P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.045306.
  4. ↑ Solem, J. C.; Rebka Jr., G. A. (1968). "EPR of atoms and radicals in radiation-damaged H2 and HD". Physical Review Letters. 21: 19. Bibcode:1968PhRvL..21...19S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.19.
  5. ↑ Solem, J. C. (1974). "Dynamic polarization of protons and deuterons in solid deuterium hydride". Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 117 (2): 477–485. Bibcode:1974NucIM.117..477S. doi:10.1016/0029-554X(74)90294-8.
  6. ↑ T.R. Carver, C.P. Slichter; Slichter (1953). "Polarization of Nuclear Spins in Metals". Physical Review. 92: 212–213. Bibcode:1953PhRv...92..212C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.212.2.
  7. ↑ T.R. Carver, C.P. Slichter; Slichter (1956). "Experimental Verification of the Overhauser Nuclear Polarization Effect". Physical Review. 102 (4): 975–980. Bibcode:1956PhRv..102..975C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.975.
  8. ↑ T. Maly, G.T. Debelouchina, V.S. Bajaj, K.-N. Hu, C.G. Joo, M.L. Mak-Jurkauskas, J.R. Sirigiri, P.C.A. van der Wel, J. Herzfeld, R.J. Temkin, R.G. Griffin; Debelouchina; Bajaj; Hu; Joo; Mak-Jurkauskas; Sirigiri; Van Der Wel; Herzfeld; Temkin; Griffin (2008). "Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Magnetic Fields". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 128 (5): 052211–19. Bibcode:2008JChPh.128e2211M. doi:10.1063/1.2833582. PMC 2770872Freely accessible. PMID 18266416.
  9. ↑ A.B. Barnes; G. De Paëpe; P.C.A. van der Wel; K.-N. Hu; C.G. Joo; V.S. Bajaj; M.L. Mak-Jurkauskas; J.R. Sirigiri; J. Herzfeld; R.J. Temkin; R.G. Griffin (2008). "High-Field Dynamic Nuclear Polarization for Solid and Solution Biological NMR". Applied Magnetic Resonance. 34 (3–4): 237–263. doi:10.1007/s00723-008-0129-1. PMC 2634864Freely accessible. PMID 19194532.
  10. ↑ Akbey, U. and Linden, A. H. and Oschkinat, H. (May 2012). "High-Temperature Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhanced Magic-Angle-Spinning NMR". Appl. Magn. Reson. 43: 81. ISSN 0937-9347.
  11. ↑ A.W. Overhauser (1953). "Polarization of Nuclei in Metals". Physical Review. 92 (2): 411–415. Bibcode:1953PhRv...92..411O. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.411.
  12. ↑ Purdue University Obituary of Albert W. Overhauser
  13. 1 2 Mentink-Vigier, F. Akbey, U. Hovav, Y. Vega, S. Oschkinat, H. Feintuch, A.; Akbey; Hovav; Vega; Oschkinat; Feintuch (2012). "Fast passage dynamic nuclear polarization on rotating solids". J. Mag. Reson. 224: 13–21. Bibcode:2012JMagR.224...13M. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2012.08.013.
  14. 1 2 Thurber, K. R. Tycko, R.; Tycko (2012). "Theory for cross effect dynamic nuclear polarization under magic-angle spinning in solid state nuclear magnetic resonance: the importance of level crossings". J. Chem. Phys. 137 (8): 084508. Bibcode:2012JChPh.137h4508T. doi:10.1063/1.4747449.

Further reading

Review Articles

[1]

Books

Special Issues

Blogs

  1. ↑ al.], Lars T. Kuhn, editor ; with contributions by Ü. Akbey ... [et (2013). Hyperpolarization methods in NMR spectroscopy. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-39728-8.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/20/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.