Environmental sex determination

Environmental sex determination or ESD is any sex-determination system in which sex is established by a nongenetic cue (e.g. nutrient availability) experienced within a discrete period after conception. In contrast, genotypic sex determination (GSD) occurs when sex is established by genetic factors (e.g. sex chromosomes) at conception.[1] Environmental sex determination should also not be confused with some forms of hermaphroditism in which the sex is determined flexibly after birth, such as dichogamy.

Examples

In its mating season in the amphipod Gammarus duebeni, photoperiod induces production of males earlier in the season, and females later. Because male fitness improves more than female fitness with increased size, environmental sex determination is adaptive in this system by permitting males to experience a longer growing season than females.[2]

The adaptive significance of environmental sex determination is not so clear for amniotes, because most amniote vertebrates have genetic sex determination. In those animals that don't, environmental sex determination occurs as temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), wherein sex of individuals is permanently determined by thermal conditions experienced approximately during the middle one-third of embryonic development.[3][4] Mammals and birds have only genetic sex determination,[5] whereas crocodilians and sphenodontians exclusively have temperature-dependent sex determination. In contrast, squamates (lizards and snakes) and turtles exhibit both genotypic sex determination and temperature-dependent sex determination, although TSD is much more common in turtles than in squamates.[6]

The branchiopod crustacean Daphnia magna parthenogenetically produces male progeny in response to environmental conditions.[7]

See also

References

  1. F. J. Janzen; P. C. Phillips (2006). "Exploring the evolution of environmental sex determination, especially in reptiles" (PDF). Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 19 (6): 1775–1784. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01138.x. PMID 17040374.
  2. J. McCabe; A. M. Dunn (1997). "Adaptive significance of environmental sex determination in an amphipod". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 10 (4): 515–527. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10040515.x.
  3. Fredric J. Janzen; Gary L. Paukstis (1991). "Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design". Quarterly Review of Biology. 66 (2): 149–179. doi:10.1086/417143. JSTOR 2830229. PMID 1891591.
  4. Nicole Valenzuela; Valentine A. Lance, eds. (2004). Temperature Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates. Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 978-1-58834-203-4.
  5. James J. Bull (1983). Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin Cummings. ISBN 978-0-201-11242-9.
  6. Fredric J. Janzen; James G. Krenz (2004). "Phylogenetics: which was first, TSD or GSD?". In Nicole Valenzuela; Valentine A. Lance. Temperature Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates (PDF). Smithsonian Institution. pp. 121–130. ISBN 978-1-58834-203-4.
  7. Yasuhiko Kato; Kaoru Kobayashi; Hajime Watanabe; Taisen Iguchi (2011). "Environmental Sex Determination in the Branchiopod Crustacean Daphnia magna: Deep Conservation of a Doublesex Gene in the Sex-Determining Pathway". PLoS Genetics. 7 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001345. PMC 3063754Freely accessible. PMID 21455482.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/16/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.