Maynard v. Cartwright

Maynard v. Cartwright

Argued April 19, 1988
Decided June 6, 1988
Full case name Maynard v. Cartwright
Citations

486 U.S. 356 (more)

Holding
Oklahoma's statutory characterization of aggravating circumstances as "especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel" is unconstitutionally vague under the Eighth Amendment; the proper analysis focuses on whether the challenged aggravating circumstance adequately informs the jury as to what it must find in order to impose the death penalty, or whether it leaves the jury with unchanneled discretion to make an arbitrary and capricious decision.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Case opinions
Majority White, joined by unanimous
Concurrence Brennan, joined by Marshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VIII

Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U. S. 356 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court case [1] in which a unanimous Court found that the "especially heinous, atrocious or cruel" standard for the application of the death penalty as defined by the Eighth Amendment was too vague. As such, Oklahoma's law was overturned based on Furman v. Georgia (1972).

Justice Brennan announced in a characteristic concurrence, joined by Justice Marshall, that he would adhere to his view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.[2]

See also

References

  1. ↑ MAYNARD V. CARTWRIGHT, 486 U.S. 356 (1988) - US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez
  2. ↑ Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227 , 231 (1976)


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 6/17/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.