Multiple sexual ornaments

Many species have multiple sexual ornaments, whereby females select mating partners using several cues instead of only one cue. Whereas this phenomenon is self-evident and hence long recognized by biologists, adaptive explanations of why females use several instead of only one signal have been formulated relatively recently. Several hypotheses exist, but mutually exclusive tests are still lacking.

Hypotheses

There are several hypotheses that attempt to explain why a male would have multiple sexual ornaments.

Multiple messages hypothesis

The multiple message hypothesis[1] states that different ornaments signal different properties of an individual's overall quality. Models support the possibility that this hypothesis is evolutionarily stable[2] but empirical tests are lacking.

Some ornaments represent long-term or short-term changes in overall condition. Elegant plumes in a bird or antlers in a deer grown once a year could signal the overall condition of an animal during the long period of growth; this is thus an example of a long-term change.[3] Secondary characters like the inflatable bare patches of skin on a grouse species or the colorful patches of skin in a primate species could represent short-term changes.[4]

Redundant signals hypothesis

The redundant signal hypothesis,[5] also known as back-up signal,[6] states that each character can only best show partial representation of overall condition. If each ornament reflected the male's quality with a certain error, then mate choice based on a single trait would lead a female to select a male in poor condition rather than one in great condition. Thus, a female ought to look at multiple sexual traits of a male if she wants to get an overall view of the male's quality. The multiple message hypothesis differs from the multiple messages hypothesis. Multiple messages hypothesis is about different signal reflects the same aspect of quality, whereas redundant signals hypothesis is about different aspect.[7] There has been some empirical support of this hypothesis.[8] However, the majority of studies showed no correlation, suggesting the redundant signals are less common in indicating mate quality compare to other hypothesis like multiple messages hypothesis.[9][10][11]

Unreliable signals hypothesis

The unreliable signal hypothesis[1] suggests that some signals are unreliable indicators of overall male quality. Therefore, a female should look at multiple traits because one trait could be misleading. There is some support for this hypothesis.[12]

Sexual interference hypothesis

The sexual interference hypothesis[13] proposes that additional male signals evolve as a way for males to hinder female mate choice by interfering with the propagation and reception of other males' sexual signals. Females respond by evolving the ability to glean meaningful information from signals despite males' attempts at obfuscation. In turn, males respond by producing better interference signals and signals that are not so easily blocked. This process increases the costs of assessment for females and the costs of signal production for males, and leads to a temporary equilibrium of honest advertising via multiple signals. This hypothesis remains untested.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Møller, A. P.; Pomiankoski, A. (1993). "Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments?". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 32: 167–176. doi:10.1007/bf00173774.
  2. ↑ Johnstone, Rufus A. (1996), "Multiple Displays in animal communication: 'backup signals' and 'multiple messages.'", Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 351 (1337): 329–338, doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0026.
  3. ↑ Moller, A. P.; Pomiankowski, Andrew (1993), "Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments?", Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32 (3): 167–176, doi:10.1007/BF00173774.
  4. ↑ Changizi, Mark A.; Zhang, Qiong; Shimojo, Shinsuke (2006), "Bare skin, blood and the evolution of primate colour vision", Biology Letters, 2 (2): 217–221, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0440, PMC 1618887Freely accessible, PMID 17148366.
  5. ↑ Zuk, M.; Ligon, J. D.; Thornhill, R. (1992). "Effects of experimental manipulations of male secondary sex characters on mate preference in red jungle fowl". Animal Behavior. 44: 999–1006. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80312-4.
  6. ↑ Candolin, Ulrika (2003). "The use of multiple cues in mate choice" (PDF). Biological Reviews.
  7. ↑ Candolin, Ulrika (2003). "The use of multiple cues in mate choice" (PDF). Biological Reviews.
  8. ↑ Jawor, Jodie M.; Breitwisch, Randall (2004), "Multiple Ornaments in male northern cardinals, Cardinalis Cardinalis, as indicators of condition", Ethology, 110 (2): 113–126, doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2003.00962.x.
  9. ↑ BIRKHEAD, T. R., FLETCHER, F. & PELLATT, E. J (1998). "Sexual selection in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata : condition, sex traits and immune capacity". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
  10. ↑ ZUK, M., THORNHILL, R., LIGON, J. D., JOHNSON, K., USTAD, S., LIGON, S. H., THORNHILL, N. W. & COSTIN, C (1990). "The role of male ornaments and courtship behavior in female mate choice of red jungle fowl.". American Naturalist. line feed character in |title= at position 9 (help)
  11. ↑ Marchetti, Karen (1998). "The evolution of multiple male traits in the yellow-browed leaf warbler". Animal Behaviour.
  12. ↑ Omland, K. E. (1996), "Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments", Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39 (6): 353–360, doi:10.1007/s002650050301.
  13. ↑ Lozano, G. A. (2009). "Multiple cues in mate selection: the sexual interference hypothesis". BioScience Hypotheses. 2 (1): 37–42. doi:10.1016/j.bihy.2008.09.001.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/25/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.