Non-Registered Intermediary

If a defendant in England and Wales is identified as being vulnerable, special measures can be taken to allow a non-registered intermediary to assist them during their trial. Around two thirds of all offenders have communication difficulties [1] and there is a high demand for non-registered intermediaries in the criminal courts. The first practical use of a defendant intermediary in a major trial is believed to be a murder case before a high court judge.[2] If an intermediary is to be used the court should then attempt to find an appropriate intermediary. HMCTS staff have been issued with guidance which includes the list of several professional organisations that may be able to assist in providing an intermediary.[3] The two largest providers of intermediaries for defendants in the criminal and family courts are Communicourt and Triangle

Intermediaries carry out a range of functions to assist the courts and criminal justice practitioners including:

The Difference Between Registered and Non-Registered Intermediaries

The Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence Act 1999 created the provision for a range of "Special Measures" for cases involving vulnerable and intimidated witnesses to give their best evidence in court, one of which is the intermediary special measure.[4] The Witness Intermediary Scheme (WIS) was set up by the Ministry of Justice’s Better Trials Unit to implement the intermediary special measure. The National Policing Improvement Agency operate and manage the WIS’s national database and matching service on behalf of the Ministry of Justice. Intermediaries appointed through the WIS will be Registered Intermediary, recruited, trained and accredited by the Ministry of Justice. RIs work through the Witness Intermediary Scheme, run by the Ministry of Justice, which maintains a register of intermediaries, providing training and matching them with witnesses or victims. The legislation currently excludes defendants from using RIs. Instead they have to rely on what the High Court called ‘private and unregulated’ helpers [5]

Vulnerable defendants frequently stand trial without the professional assistance they require. Defendants do not have access to the MoJ "Registered Intermediaries" but should still have access to high quality intermediaries with skills not only in assisting with evidence giving, but also in helping the defendant to understand the case against him/her, instruct his legal team, and participate in the trial.

Ground Rules Hearing

In preparation for trial, courts must take ‘every reasonable step’ to facilitate the participation of witnesses and defendants. One such step is the ground rules hearing:[6] A pre-trial meeting of the trial judge, trial advocates and intermediary with the aim of deciding how someone who has communication needs or is otherwise vulnerable should be enabled to give their best evidence, or how a vulnerable defendant can participate effectively in the trial. 'Ground rules' for questioning must be discussed between the court, the advocates and the intermediary before giving evidence.[7] GRHs are a form of case management hearing and discussion of ground rules is required in all intermediary trials. Intermediaries indicated[8] the most important matters which needed to be discussed at a GRH:

i. The recommendations in the intermediary report/ going through the questioning recommendations

ii. When, and how often, breaks should occur (for the vulnerable person)

iii. How and when the intermediary should intervene / get the judge’s attention if there is a communication issue

iv. How to introduce and use communication aids

v. Strategies to keep the vulnerable person calm and engaged

vi. The role of the intermediary

vii. The relevant materials from The Advocates Gateway

viii. When the vulnerable person will practice with the video link (if used)

ix. When the judge and counsel will meet the vulnerable witness

x. The need for flexibility e.g. to have another GRH if the situation changes

Intermediaries in Family Cases

The family courts are now more familiar in recent times with the concept of an intermediary being involved in cases where an individual may have Learning Disabilities.[9] In family cases, most intermediaries will be operating outside the WIS and in these circumstances they will be non-registered intermediaries. The intermediary should be matched according to their communication specialism, their availability and, if possible, their geographic location.[10] Funding must be agreed on a case-by-case basis as there is no standard procedure in Family Courts. Sometimes the cost of the intermediary is shared by the LAA, the court and the local authority. Sometimes it is funded solely by the court. Some intermediaries have reported a lack of clarity amongst practitioners about the role of the intermediary in family cases.[11]

In the matter of D (A Child) [2014] EWFC 39 [12] the President noted: ‘The mother and the father may require the use of an intermediary, not merely in the court setting but also, for example, when meeting professionals out of court'. Furthermore with reference to the matter of A (A Child) [2013] EWHC 3502 [13] the legal representatives should normally by the date of the case management hearing identify an agency to assist their client to give evidence through an intermediary or otherwise if the court concludes that such measures are required.[14]

Communicourt Code of Practice for NRI's[15]

The primary responsibility of the Non-Registered Intermediary is to enable complete, coherent and accurate communication to take place between a defendant who requires special measures and the court

Non-Registered Intermediaries must have a clear and comprehensive understanding of the responsibilities and duties of their role within the criminal justice system, including their primary responsibility to the court

They must conduct themselves in court in a manner that facilitates accurate and coherent communication between the defendant and the court

They must respect at all times the authority and judgement of the court

References

  1. ↑ Professor Karen Bryan: Sheffield Hallam University IJLCD Winter Lecture,: Language Difficulties and Criminal Justice Processes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYFd3J6z_vI&sns=tw
  2. ↑ Joanna Lawrence - Gillian Frost: The use of Intermediaries (2012) http://www.communicourt.co.uk/gillian-frost-the-use-of-intermediaries/
  3. ↑ R v GP - In the Crown Court at Leeds: T2012 0409 http://www.communicourt.co.uk/r-v-gp/
  4. ↑ The Role of Intermediaries: AAC SIG 12 June 2008, slide 3 www.aacsig.org.uk/sites/default/files/.../the-role-of-the-intermediaries.ppt
  5. ↑ http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/high-court-rules-vulnerable-defendants-deserve-equal-protection/5041833.fullarticle
  6. ↑ The Advocates Gateway - Ground Rules Hearings: Planning to question a vulnerable person or someone with communication needs Toolkit 1(c) 21 October 2013 http://www.theadvocatesgateway.org/images/toolkits/1cGroundrules211013.pdf
  7. ↑ The Advocates Gateway: Responding to communication needs in the justice system http://www.theadvocatesgateway.org/intermediaries
  8. ↑ Highs and Lows: The 4th Intermediary Survey, Penny Cooper: Kingston University London July 2014 (updated 13 October 2014) http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/28868/1/Cooper_P-28868.pdf
  9. ↑ Case No: B4/2013/2048 & B4/2014/0198 Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Civ 128 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION Re C (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 128
  10. ↑ The Advocate's Gateway: Vulnerable Witnesses and Parties in the Family Courts Toolkit 13, 8/11/2014 http://www.familylaw.co.uk/system/redactor_assets/documents/2029/13vulnerablewitnessesandpartiesinthefamilycourts081114.pdf
  11. ↑ Cooper, 2014: ‘Speaking when they are spoken to: hearing vulnerable witnesses in care proceedings’ CFLQ 26(2):132–51
  12. ↑ In the Family Court at Swindon, In the Matter of D (A Child) https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/re-child-d.pdf
  13. ↑ In the High Court of Justice Family Division Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 3502 (Fam) Case No: UW11C00045 http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed123147
  14. ↑ Re C (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 128 Case No: B4/2013/2048 & B4/2014/0198 Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Civ 128 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT FAMILY DIVISION (HIS HONOUR JUDGE TURNER QC) paragraph 25
  15. ↑ Communicourt Code of Practice http://www.communicourt.co.uk/resources/code-of-practice/
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/18/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.