North American Numbering Plan expansion

The North American numbering plan expansion is a proposed expansion of the North American Numbering Plan to accommodate future needs beyond the current 10-digit limitations used in telephone numbers.

History

The North American Numbering Plan has been in use since 1947. Occasionally, the growing demand for telephone numbers has threatened to break the plan. Instead of changing to 8-digit local phone numbers, like many countries outside North America, NANPA was modified to allow continued use of 7-digit local numbers (mostly) and 10-digit nationwide numbers for many more years. The first changes assigned the legal but unused area codes (NPAs) of the original plan. The later changes revised the rules for area codes and exchanges, which created many more legal area codes (and exchanges) for ongoing assignment. (This added the requirement of dialing 1 before dialing a 10-digit phone number, because the first 7 digits of every 10-digit phone number are likely to be a valid 7-digit phone number.)

Every place already has an area code, so assigning a new area code requires either geographically splitting an existing area code (and changing half the subscribers in that area to the new area code, at great discomfort), or having the new area code mutually cover the same (unchanged) geographical area (one area, two or more codes – overlay plan). The first new area codes were geographic splits, until the geographical areas were at risk of becoming unreasonably small. Since then, most new area codes are overlaid. When a geographical area has more than one area code, carriers no longer support dialing 7-digit local numbers, and require ten-digit dialing for all calls within the geographical area. Imposing ten-digit dialing keeps the original area code from being preferred, and discourages the tradition of omitting the local area code (which would eventually cause confusion when it is not clear which local area code was omitted). Imposing ten-digit dialing for local calls effectively converts every local number in these geographical areas into a ten-digit local number. Universal ten-digit local numbers are arguably inevitable, as more and more geographical areas get overlaid, and local number portability continually makes more and more users that have non-local area codes. (Area codes continually lose geographic relevance.)

Current situation

Demand for telephone numbers has continued to grow. It will soon be necessary to reduce (or discard) the geographic association of "area codes" and begin assigning new users to arbitrary ten-digit phone numbers, or else finally change from the strict 10-digit format to something else (10-or-11 digits, 11 digits, or 12 digits).

Ten decimal digits allows an absolute maximum of 10 billion telephone numbers. The numbering rules of the plan reduce that to 6.4 billion telephone numbers. However, a considerable percentage of these numbers will remain unused when the last available NPA code is assigned, because thousands of numbers will be reserved in exchanges that serve only small population centers, the exchange being served by a single NPA-NXX combination in non-competitive markets. More combinations would be partially unused in the event that a small market has competitive providers.

Many blocks of numbers that were unassignable have been reclaimed (made usable) by rate center consolidation and (in the US) number pooling.

Many phone numbers that are never published or dialed are tied up in "hunt groups". There is no talk of reclaiming these numbers.

Expansion options have been discussed by industry forums for several years and, although a recommendation has been made, that expansion plan format has not been approved by the regulatory authorities, i.e. the Federal Communications Commission in the United States and the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission, and the regulators may choose a different expansion plan. The industry forum considered dozens of potential options and identified the difficulties with each option.

NANPA regularly performs exhaustion analyses. The 2014 analysis anticipates exhaustion after 2044.[1]

Current industry recommendation

In the usual phone number jargon, the letter N represents a numeral from 2 through 9, while the letter X represents any numeral. Thus an NXX number may be any from 200 through 999, while XXXX would be 0000 through 9999. The first three digits of ten are referred to, by industry jargon, as the NPA, the next three as the NXX or CO code (Central Office code), and the last four as the line number.

The telephone industry's current recommendation assumes first that mandatory dialing of all ten digits is required to complete telephone numbers, even for a local call, throughout the North American Numbering Plan area, which includes many Caribbean and Pacific territories and nations.

The plan proposes the insertion of 00 or 11 between the NPA and the NXX, to produce 12-digit numbers. The plan further proposes that the US would use either 00 or 11, while Canada would use the other, in order to allow customers to distinguish countries by use of these digits, which do not appear at the beginning of the 12-digit number.

Under this proposal, the N9X format NPA codes, which are currently reserved from assignment, would be released and be available for normal assignment for code relief and other purposes.

Examples

For these examples, we will assume that the new digits will be '00' for the US, and '11' for Canada. With these assumptions, under this plan, the New Jersey telephone number 609-555-0175 would become 6090-0555-0175, and would be dialed as such. Likewise, the Ontario number 613-555-0175 would become 6131-1555-0175.

One advantage is that during the transition period, permissive dialing could be enabled. This means that until everyone has adjusted to the new dialing system, users would still be able dial the shorter, 10 digit numbers. Since currently, the 4th digit (or digit 'D') cannot be 1 or 0, if the telephone system detects 1 or 0 in the 4th position it will process the number as a new 12 digit number, and if it is any digit other than 1 or 0, it can process it as an existing 10 digit number until the transition is complete.

Other proposals

Proposals that utilize the reserved N9X format codes for expansion include the following proposals:

N9XX, with no change to the remainder of the phone number

This proposal would expand numbers to eleven digits overall. A 9 would be inserted as the new second digit of all area codes (e.g. 212 would become 2912, 916 would become 9916). Permissive dialing would be allowed, as exchange equipment, on detecting a 9 as the second digit of the area code, would respond appropriately to expect 11 digits, or 10 in the absence of a 9 in that position.

Under this plan, the New Jersey telephone number 609-555-0175 would become 6909-555-0175.

N9XX, with a new initial digit

With a new initial digit in front of the last seven digits of the phone number, this proposal would expand numbers to twelve digits overall. As with the above plan, a 9 would be inserted as the new second digit of all area codes. The problem would occur with permissive dialing of local calls where the area code is not presently required (areas with no overlay in effect). If the added digit were 3, for example, numbers that already begin with a 3 would present a problem, probably resolved using either a "time-out" if the customer only dials seven digits, or a flash-cut to mandatory eight digit dialing.

Under this plan, the New Jersey telephone number 609-555-0175 could become 6909-3555-0175, although the added '3' in the '3555' could theoretically be any digit.

References

  1. April 2014 NANP Exhaust Analysis

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/30/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.