North West Route Utilisation Strategy

The North West Route Utilisation Strategy (NWRUS) is a Route Utilisation Strategy, published by Network Rail in May 2007.[1][2] It was the fifth RUS to be produced. It was included in a map published by the Office of Rail Regulation as established in May 2007.[3] It was the first of no fewer than 5 RUSs which cover specific routes in the north-west of England; the others are the Lancashire & Cumbria RUS (published August 2008), the Yorkshire & Humber RUS (published July 2009), the Merseyside RUS (published March 2009), and the West Coast Main Line RUS (now scheduled for publication in summer 2011). In particular it "broadly covers the Manchester journey to work area, the City lines into Liverpool Lime Street and routes from Manchester to Kirkby, Southport and Blackpool", corresponding to Network Rail's then Route 20 - North West Urban.[4]

As with other RUSs, the NWRUS took into account a number of responses,[5][6][7] including the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) .[8]

The RUS has identified 12 generic issues and relates these to the various rail 'corridors' in the region. As has become customary with RUSs, the recommendations are also nominally grouped into short-term (to end of CP4, March 2009), medium-term (CP5, 2014) and some long-term (thereafter) solutions; however, the individual initiatives are not as clearly located in time as other RUSs.

Some issues were passed to later RUSs: Lancashire & Cumbria;[9] Merseyside;[10] Yorkshire & Humber;[11] West Coast Main Line.[12]

A number of issues and provisional recommendations were viewed to be dependent on the December 2008 WCML timetable. The precise effect on these possible recommendations by the implementation of that timetable is difficult to ascertain.

Stations and their codes

Central and interchange stations in the Manchester conurbation

There are four central Manchester stations (with their National Rail codes), all providing various levels of interchange: Manchester Piccadilly (MAN), Manchester Oxford Road (MCO), Deansgate (DGT) and Manchester Victoria (MCV); there are two Salford stations: Salford Central (SFD) and Salford Crescent (SLD), both significant interchange stations.

Other significant stations

Codes for some other stations in the region are as follows: Liverpool Lime Street - LIV; Stockport - SPT; New Mills Central - NMC; New Mills Newtown - NMN; Trafford Park - TRA; Hadfield - HDF; Glossup - GLO; Stalybridge - SYB; Preston - PRE; Blackburn - BBN; Blackpool North - BPN; Blackpool South - BPS; Squires Gate (for Blackpool airport) - SQU; Kirkham & Wesham - KKM; Atherton (Manchester) - ATN; Newton-le-Willows - NLW; Manchester Airport - MIA.

The corridors

The corridors comprise two on the periphery of central Manchester, 12 'spokes' radiating from central Manchester, and one other from Liverpool. They are listed below with their general orientation and the corresponding central/interchange station(s) from which they emanate, where appropriate.

Generic issues and sample recommendations

Inadequate capacity in the peaks

There is inadequate capacity in the peaks on most corridors, and this problem is likely potentially to get worse in the face of forecast increasing demand. As with several other RUSs the chief solution recommended is to add cars to the trains, which in many cases will require platform extensions, or less commonly to provide additional services, which may require other infrastructural enhancements.

The broad strategy outlined is, in the short term, the redistribution of the present fleet, and in the medium term the provision of about 50 additional vehicles, which will require extra stabling. In the longer term a further approximately 50 cars may be necessary, depending on whether growth is at the higher levels of expectations.

Links between the major cities in the North West

The main link is between Liverpool and Manchester, which has fewer fast services than between Manchester and Leeds, though the traffic is greater. Also perceived to have inadequate services are the connections from both those cities to other major urban centres, e.g. Preston, Blackburn.

The RUS outlined the possibility of adding in the short term an additional fast service, making 4 such trains per hour (tph) in each direction between Manchester and Liverpool, with the proviso that all the services would need to use the same Manchester station. In the medium term, there are aspirations for higher linespeeds via Chat Moss.

Also mooted was the possibility of one extra (making 2tph) between Manchester and Preston.

Few corridors connect through Manchester

Some services continue through Manchester and provide direct connections to significant destinations. But most work into just one side of Manchester, with no direct connections to another side of Manchester. The largest single contribution to alleviating this problem is likely to be the relocation (or redevelopment) of Salford Crescent. Other, less substantial, interventions include reinstating a bay platform at Salford Central allowing Rochdale corridor trains to continue beyond Victoria.

Integration with Metrolink requires developing

In the short term it is proposed to improve signage and 'passenger environment' at Eccles to encourage interchange from the Chat Moss line to Metrolink; in the medium term this may lead to further Chat Moss services stopping at Eccles. In the long term an interchange between the CLC line and Metrolink in the Cornbrook or Pomona area may be developed, partly dependent on the results at Eccles.

Links to the region's airport are insufficient

The area has three airports: Manchester, Liverpool John Lennon and Blackpool. There is a perception that rail links need to be improved. A third platform at MIA was planned which would ease the problem of reactionary delays on relevant services. Improved interchange at Salford Crescent would improve accessibility to MIA to/from a number of locations. No recommendations with respect to the other two airports, other than better regional links generally, were accepted.

Freight traffic and growth is constrained by existing capacity/capability

The Freight RUS identified the Castlefield route as a capacity pinch point. The NWRUS identified a number of possible interventions, some of which would have impacts on other issues.

Access to Trafford Park container terminal is constrained, and may be alleviated by lengthening trains (in the short term) and infrastructure enhancements (in the medium term).

Simplification of handling of stone trains from Peak Forest, including remodelling at Buxton, is desirable, and clearing of the route through New Mills, Guide Bridge, Stockport or Victoria to RA10 capability by prioritising renewal of structures 2007 to 2014 was recommended; this would improve overall performance on the route.

Platforms at Salford Crescent and Manchester Piccadilly are congested at times

Salford Crescent comprises a simple island platform, but has in practice become a major actual and potential interchange point, as well a significant destination in its own right. It is highly desirable that the station be developed to handle the present and desired traffic; the currently-favoured option is to move the station northwards to a more spacious location, as minimal alterations to the layout would be required; if so the enhanced facilities would include 4 through platforms and two bay platforms.

Lack of facilities, including parking, at some stations

Guide Bridge and Newton-le-Willows are to be developed as 'park-and-ride' locations.

A significant number of stations see very light traffic

No fewer than 44 stations have below 50 regular passengers. However none is scheduled for immediate closure because of the cost and involvement of doing so. But increased traffic on other stations on these routes and other factors may make this unavoidable. In that case the full process for the closing of stations will have to be gone through.

Reactionary delays tending to perpetuate, lowering performance

This is particularly the case on the Castlefield corridor; however the RUS states mainly that the effect of various interventions could not be assessed until the December 2008 WCML timetables were known.

A lot of rolling stock fits the current use poorly

This issue affect the following aspects:

As more new and refurbished rolling stock is designed and becomes available, solutions to these issues should be possible to provide a better fit of stock to services.

Subsequent developments

Route 20 "A North West Feasibility Study to examine options to increase the capacity of the Manchester ‘Hub’ will be started in CP3. Assuming a business case can be proven, work to develop any significant recommended infrastructure schemes could commence in CP4, but with implementation in CP5."

The Olive Mount chord was implemented in December 2008.[13]

The third platform at Manchester Airport was completed in December 2008.[14]

The December 2008 timetable includes the following off-peak services from LIV to Manchester (and corresponding reverse-direction services):

The December 2008 timetable includes the following off-peak services from Preston to Manchester (and corresponding reverse-direction services):

NR CP4 Delivery Plan 2009

In March 2009 Network Rail published its CP4 Delivery Plan 2009, including Enhancements programme: statement of scope, outputs and milestones,[15] confirming several of the recommended interventions. Specific projects, with their reference and page numbers in the document, are given below:

References

  1. ↑ The published NR NWRUS
  2. ↑ TravelWatch NORTHWEST press release
  3. ↑ ORR May 2007 map of RUSs
  4. ↑ Route Plan 20
  5. ↑ Northern Rail's response
  6. ↑ First TransPennine Express response
  7. ↑ North West Rail Users response
  8. ↑ ORR's response to consultation
  9. ↑ Lancashire & Cumbria RUS
  10. ↑ Merseyside RUS
  11. ↑ Yorkshire & Humber RUS
  12. ↑ West Coast Main Line RUS Scoping document, section 4.4.2 p.6
  13. ↑ Merseyside RUS, p.33
  14. ↑ Route Plan 20, 2009, p.9
  15. ↑ NR Enhancements delivery plan
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/24/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.