Percolation critical exponents

In the context of percolation theory, a percolation transition is characterized by a set of universal critical exponents, which describe the fractal properties of the percolating medium at large scales and sufficiently close to the transition. The exponents are universal in the sense that they only depend on the type of percolation model and on the space dimension. They are expected not to depend on microscopic details like the lattice structure or whether site or bond percolation is considered. This article deals with the critical exponents of random percolation.

Percolating systems have a parameter $p\,\!$ which controls the occupancy of sites or bonds in the system. At a critical value $p_c\,\!$, the mean cluster size goes to infinity and the percolation transition takes place. As one approaches $p_c\,\!$, various quantities either diverge or go to a constant value by a power law in $|p - p_c|\,\!$, and the exponent of that power law is the critical exponent. While the exponent of that power law is generally the same on both sides of the threshold, the coefficient or "amplitude" is generally different, leading to a universal amplitude ratio.

Description

In the behavior of thermodynamic or configurational systems near a critical point or a continuous phase transition, the system become fractal and the behavior of many quantities are described by universal critical exponents. Percolation theory is a particularly simple and fundamental model in statistical mechanics which has a critical point, and a great deal of work has been done in finding its critical exponents, both theoretically (limited to two dimensions) and numerically.

Critical exponents exist for a variety of observables, but most of them are linked to each other by exponent (or scaling) relations. Only a few of them are independent, and it is a matter of taste what the fundamental exponents are. One choice is the set $\{\sigma,\, \tau\}\,\!$ motivated by the cluster size distribution, another choice is $\{d_\text{f},\, \nu\}\,\!$ motivated by the structure of the infinite cluster. So-called correction exponents extend these sets, they refer to higher orders of the asymptotic expansion around the critical point.

Definitions of exponents

Self-similarity at the percolation threshold

Percolation clusters become self-similar precisely at the threshold density $p_c\,\!$ for sufficiently large length scales, entailing the following asymptotic power laws:

The fractal dimension $d_\text{f}\,\!$ relates how the mass of the incipient infinite cluster depends on the radius or another length measure, $M(L) \sim L^{d_\text{f}}\,\!$ at $p=p_{c}\,\!$ and for large probe sizes, $L\to\infty\,\!$.

The Fisher exponent $\tau \,\!$ characterizes the cluster-size distribution $n_s\,\!$, which is often determined in computer simulations. The latter counts the number of clusters with a given size (volume) $s\,\!$, normalized by the total volume (number of lattice sites). The distribution obeys a power law at the threshold, $n_s \sim s^{-\tau}\,\!$ asymptotically as $s\to\infty\,\!$.

The probability for two sites separated by a distance $\vec r\,\!$ to belong to the same cluster decays as $g(\vec r)\sim |\vec r|^{-2(d-d_\text{f})}\,\!$ or $g(\vec r)\sim |\vec r|^{-d+(2-\eta)}\,\!$ for large distances, which introduces the anomalous dimension $\eta\,\!$.

The exponent $\Omega \,\!$ is connected with the leading correction to scaling, which appears, e.g., in the asymptotic expansion of the cluster-size distribution, $n_s \sim s^{-\tau}(1+\text{const} \times s^{-\Omega})\,\!$ for $s\to\infty\,\!$.

The minimum or chemical distance exponent $d_\mathrm{min}$ describes how the average minimum distance $\langle \ell \rangle$ relates to the Euclidean distance $r$, namely $\langle \ell \rangle \sim r^{d_\mathrm{min}}$ . A related quantity is the spreading dimension $d_\ell$, which describes the scaling of the mass M of a critical cluster within a chemical distance $\ell$ as $M \sim \ell^{d_\ell}$, and is related to the fractal dimension $d_{f}$ of the cluster by $d_\ell = d_f/d_\mathrm{min}$ .

Critical behavior close to the percolation threshold

The approach to the percolation threshold is governed by power laws again, which hold asymptotically close to $p_c\,\!$:

The exponent $\nu \,\!$ describes the divergence of the correlation length $\xi\,\!$ as the percolation transition is approached, $\xi \sim |p-p_c|^{-\nu}\,\!$. The infinite cluster becomes homogeneous at length scales beyond the correlation length; further, it is a measure for the linear extent of the largest finite cluster.

Off criticality, only finite clusters exist up to a largest cluster size $s_\max\,\!$, and the cluster-size distribution is smoothly cut off by a rapidly decaying function, $n_s \sim s^{-\tau} f(s/s_\max)\,\!$. The exponent $\sigma$ characterizes the divergence of the cutoff parameter, $s_\max \sim |p-p_c|^{-1/\sigma}\,\!$. Obviously, $s_\max \sim \xi^{d_\text{f}}\,\!$, yielding $\sigma = 1/\nu d_\text{f}\,\!$.

The density of clusters (number of clusters per site) $n_c$ is continuous at the threshold but its third derivative goes to infinity as determined by the exponent $\alpha$: $n_c \sim A + B (p - p_c) + C (p - p_c)^2 + D_\pm |p - p_c|^{2 - \alpha} + \cdots$, where $D_\pm$ represents the coefficient above and below the transition point.

The strength or weight of the percolating cluster $P\,\!$ or $P_\infty$ vanishes at the transition and is non-analytic, $P\sim |p-p_c|^\beta\,\!$, defining the exponent $\beta \,\!$. $\ P$ plays the role of an order parameter.

The divergence of the mean cluster size $S=\sum_s s^2 n_s/p_c \sim |p-p_c|^{-\gamma}\,\!$ introduces the exponent $\gamma \,\!$.

Scaling relations

Hyperscaling relations

$\tau = \frac{d}{d_\text{f}} + 1\,\!$

$d_\text{f} = d - \frac{\beta}{\nu}\,\!$

$2 d_\text{f} - d = 2 - \eta\,\!$

Relations based on $\{\sigma, \tau\}$

$\alpha = 2 - \frac{\tau - 1}{\sigma}\,\!$

$\beta = \frac{\tau - 2}{\sigma}\,\!$

$\gamma = \frac{3-\tau}{\sigma}\,\!$

$\nu = \frac{\tau-1}{\sigma d}\,\!$

$\delta = \frac{1}{\tau-2}\,\!$

Relations based on $\{d_\text{f}, \nu\}$

$\alpha = 2 - \nu d\,\!$

$\beta = \nu (d - d_\text{f})\,\!$

$\gamma = \nu (2 d_\text{f} - d)\,\!$

$\sigma = \frac{1}{ \nu d_\text{f}}\,\!$

Exponents for standard percolation

d	2	3	4	5	6 – ε [1]	6 +
α	–2/3	-0.625(3)	-0.756(40)		–1 + ε / 7	-1
β	0.14(3) [2] 5/36	0.4181(8)	0.657(9)	0.830(10)	1 – ε / 7	1
γ	43/18	1.793(3) 1.805(20) [3]	1.422(16) 1.435(15) [3]	1.185(5) [3]	1 + ε / 7	1
η	5/24	0.046(8) [4]^* 0.059(9) [5]^*	-0.0944(28) [6]		–ε / 21	0
ν	1.33(5) [7] 4/3	0.80(5) [7] 0.875(1) [4]^* 0.8765(18) [8] 0.8764(12) [9] 0.8751(11) [10] 0.87619(12) [11]	0.689(10) [6]	0.569(5)	1/2 + 5ε / 84	1/2
σ	36/91	0.42(6) [12] 0.445(10) [4] 0.4522(8) [6]	0.476(5)	0.496(4)	1/2 + O(ε²)	1/2
τ	187/91	2.186(2) [5] 2.189(2) [4] 2.190(2) [13] 2.189(1) [14] 2.18906(8)[6] 2.18909(5)[11]	2.313(3)[15] 2.313(2) [13]	2.412(4) [15]	5/2 – 3ε / 14	5/2
δ	91/5	5.29(6) [4]^*
$d_\text{f}$	91/48	2.523(4) [4]^* 2.530(4) [5]^* 2.5230(1) [8] 2.5226(1) [16] 2.52293(10) [11]	3.05(5)	3.54(4)	4 – 10ε / 21	4
Ω	0.70(2) [13] 0.77(4) [17] 0.77(2) [18] 72/91 [19][20]	0.64(2) [4] 0.60(8) [13]	0.5(1) [13]
ω			1.13(10) [6]
t	1.3	2				3
$d_\text{b}$	1.647(4) [21]	1.8				2
$d_\text{min}$	1.1307(4) [21] 1.130 77(2) [22]	1.374(6) [23] 1.3756(6) [22] 1.375 5(3) [11]	1.607(5) [15]	1.812(6) [15]		2

Exponents for standard percolation on a non-trivial planar lattice (Weighted planar stochastic lattice (WPSL))

WPSL	Exponents
$d$	$2$
$\nu$	${\displaystyle 1.635}$
$\beta$	${\displaystyle 0.222}$
$\gamma$	${\displaystyle 2.825}$
$\tau$	${\displaystyle 2.072}$
${\displaystyle d_{f}}$	${\displaystyle 1.864}$

Note that it has been claimed that the numerical values of exponents of percolation depends only on the dimension of lattice. However, percolation on WPSL is an exception in the sense that albeit it is two dimensional yet it does not belong to the same universality where all the planar lattices belong.^[24][25]

See also

• Critical exponent
• Percolation theory
• Percolation threshold
• Conductivity near the percolation threshold

References

1. Essam, J. W. (1980). "Percolation theory". Rep. Prog. Phys. 43 (7): 833–912. Bibcode:1980RPPh...43..833E. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/43/7/001.
2. Sykes, M. F.; M. Glen; D. S. Gaunt (1974). "The percolation probability for the site problem on the triangular lattice". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 7 (9): L105–L108. Bibcode:1974JPhA....7L.105S. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/7/9/002.
3. Adler, J.; Y. Meir; A. Aharony; A.B. Harris (1990). "Series Study of Percolation Moments in General Dimension". Phys. Rev. E. 41: 9183–9206. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9183.
4. Lorenz, C. D.; R. M. Ziff (1998). "Precise determination of the bond percolation thresholds and finite-size scaling corrections for the sc, fcc, and bcc lattices". Phys. Rev. E. 57: 230–236. arXiv:cond-mat/9710044. Bibcode:1998PhRvE..57..230L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.57.230.
5. Jan, N.; D. Stauffer (1998). "Random Site Percolation in Three Dimensions". Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 9: 341–347. Bibcode:1998IJMPC...9..341J. doi:10.1142/S0129183198000261.
6. Ballesteros, H. G.; L. A. Fernández; V. Martín-Mayor; A. Muñoz Sudepe; G. Parisi; J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo (1997). "Measures of critical exponents in the four-dimensional site percolation". Physics Letters B. 400: 346–351. arXiv:hep-lat/9612024. Bibcode:1997PhLB..400..346B. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00337-7.
7. Levenshteĭn, M. E.; B. I. Shklovskiĭ; M. S. Shur; A. L. Éfros (1975). "The relation between the critical exponents of percolation theory". Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 69: 386–392.,
8. Ballesteros, P. N.; L. A. Fernández; V. Martín-Mayor; A. Muñoz Sudepe; G. Parisi; J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo (1999). "Scaling corrections: site percolation and Ising model in three dimensions". Journal of Physics A. 32: 1–13. arXiv:cond-mat/9805125. Bibcode:1999JPhA...32....1B. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/32/1/004.
9. Wang, J.; Z. Zhou; W. Zhang; T. M. Garoni; Y. Deng (2013). "Bond and site percolation in three dimensions". Physical Review E. 87: 052107. arXiv:1302.0421. Bibcode:2013PhRvE..87e2107W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052107.,
10. Hu, H.; H. W. Blöte; R. M. Ziff; Y. Deng (2014). "Short-range correlations in percolation at criticality". Physical Review E. 90. arXiv:1406.0130. Bibcode:2014PhRvE..90d2106H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042106.
11. Xu, Xiao; Wang, Junfeng; Lv, Jian-Ping; Deng, Youjin (2014). "Simultaneous analysis of three-dimensional percolation models". Frontiers of Physics. 9: 113–119. arXiv:1310.5399. Bibcode:2014FrPhy...9..113X. doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0403-z.
12. Sykes, M. F.; D. S. Gaunt; J. W. Essam (1976). "The percolation probability for the site problem on the face-centred cubic lattice". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9 (5): L43–L46. Bibcode:1976JPhA....9L..43S. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/5/002.
13. Tiggemann, D. (2001). "Simulation of percolation on massively parallel computers". Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 12 (6): 871–878. arXiv:cond-mat/0106354. Bibcode:2001IJMPC..12..871T. doi:10.1142/S012918310100205X.
14. Tiggemann, D. (2006). "Percolation on growing lattices". Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 17 (8): 1141–1150. arXiv:cond-mat/0604418. Bibcode:2006IJMPC..17.1141T. doi:10.1142/S012918310600962X.
15. Paul, Gerald; R. M. Ziff; H. E. Stanley (2001). "Percolation threshold, Fisher exponent, and shortest path exponent for four and five dimensions". Phys. Rev. E. 64: 026115. arXiv:cond-mat/0101136. Bibcode:2001PhRvE..64b6115P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026115.
16. Deng, Youjin; Henk W. J. Blöte (2005). "Monte Carlo study of the site-percolation model in two and three dimensions". Phys. Rev. E. 72: 016126. Bibcode:2005PhRvE..72a6126D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.72.016126.
17. Kammerer, A.; F. Höfling; T. Franosch (2008). "Cluster-resolved dynamic scaling theory and universal corrections for transport on percolating systems". Europhys. Lett. 84: 66002. arXiv:0811.1414. Bibcode:2008EL.....8466002K. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/84/66002.
18. Ziff, R. M.; F. Babalievski (1999). "Site percolation on the Penrose rhomb lattice". Physica A. 269: 201–210. Bibcode:1999PhyA..269..201Z. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00166-1.
19. Ziff, R. M. (2011). "Correction-to-scaling exponent for two-dimensional percolation". Phys. Rev. E. 83 (2): 020107. arXiv:1101.0807. Bibcode:2011PhRvE..83b0107Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.020107.
20. Aharony, Amnon; Asikainen, Joonas (2003). "Fractal dimension and corrections to scaling for critical Potts clusters". Fractals, Supplementary Issue. 11 (1): 3–7. doi:10.1142/S0218348X03001665.
21. Grassberger, Peter (1992). "Spreading and backbone dimensions of ZD percolation". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25: 5475–5484. Bibcode:1992JPhA...25.5475G. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/25/21/009.
22. Zhou, Zongzheng; Ji Yang; Youjin Deng; Robert M. Ziff (2012). "Shortest-path fractal dimension for percolation in two and three dimensions". Physical Review E. 86: 061101. arXiv:1110.1955. Bibcode:2012PhRvE..86a1101G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.86.011101.
23. Grassberger, Peter (1992). "Numerical studies of critical percolation in three dimensions". J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25: 5867–5888. Bibcode:1992JPhA...25.5867G. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/25/22/015.
24. M. K. Hassan and M. M. Rahman, “Percolation on a multifractal scale-free planar stochastic lattice and its universality class” Phys. Rev. E (Rapid Communication) 92 040101(R) (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92 040101
25. M. K. Hassan and M. M. Rahman, “Universality class of site and bond percolation on multi-multifractal scale-free planar stochastic lattice” Phys. Rev. E 94 042109 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94 042109

Further reading

• Stauffer, D.; Aharony, A. (1994), Introduction to Percolation Theory (2nd ed.), CRC Press, ISBN 978-0-7484-0253-3
• ben-Avraham, D.; Havlin, S. (2000), Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-61720-8
• Bunde, A.; Havlin, S. (1996), Fractals and Disordered Systems, Springer, ISBN 978-3-642-84868-1