Reform Club of Hong Kong

This article is about the Reform Club in Hong Kong. For other uses, see Reform Club (disambiguation)
Reform Club of Hong Kong
香港革新會
Chairman Brook Bernacchi
Founder Brook Bernacchi
Founded 20 January 1949 (1949-01-20)[1]
Dissolved Around 1995
Ideology Liberalism
Political position Centre to Centre-left
Reform Club of Hong Kong
Traditional Chinese 香港革新會

The Reform Club of Hong Kong (Chinese: 香港革新會) was one of the oldest political groups in Hong Kong existed from 1949 until the mid-1990s. Together with the Civic Association, they were the closest to opposition parties in Hong Kong during the post-war colonial period.

History

The Reform Club was founded by expatriate barrister Brook Bernacchi in 1949 the midst of the debate over the Young Plan, a plan for wide constitutional reform in Hong Kong. The immediate target of the Club was to campaign for direct elections to the Legislative Council of Hong Kong.[2] Different from the Hong Kong Chinese Reform Association which was set up during the same time with the similar causes, the Reform Club was dominated by expatriates.

For decades the Reform Club and the Civic Association dominated the municipal politics as they provided most of the elected members of the Urban Council. It advocated more representative government in the territory and the improvement of public sector social services. In 1960, the two groups formed a coalition and sent a delegate to London to demand direct elections to the Legislative Council. In 1979, the Reform Club threatened to boycott elections if the Urban Council would not receive a majority of elected members and universal franchise was extended to all Hong Kong citizens. In 1982, it took part in the elections for the newly established district boards in the urban districts, which significantly extended the franchise.

Before the expansion of the franchise, the Reform Club had 15 members in the Urban Council 1983. But the Reform Club's influence in the Urban Council reduced during the 1980s. Following the 1989 municipal elections, only five Reform Club members remained due to its lack of grassroots support. The Reform Club and Civic Association were gradually supplanted by the new pro-democracy groups including the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood and Meeting Point. When at the 1995 municipal elections Brook Bernacchi retired, the Reform Club ceased to be active in the Hong Kong political scene.

Notable members

Election performance

Municipal elections

Election Number of
popular votes
% of
popular votes
UrbCo
seats
RegCo
seats
Total
elected seats
1952 2,199Steady 33.58Steady
1 / 2
-
1953 6,374Increase 71.25Increase
4 / 4
-
1954 7,773Increase 79.64Increase
4 / 4
-
1955 3,283Decrease 89.62Increase
4 / 4
-
1956 17,085Increase 56.97Decrease
6 / 8
1957 11,716Increase 43.50Decrease
5 / 8
1959 12,030Decrease 47.67Decrease
4 / 8
1961 uncontested uncontested
4 / 8
1963 5,177Decrease 39.43Decrease
3 / 8
1965 unknown unknown
5 / 10
1967 9,789Increase 24.90Decrease
4 / 10
1969 16,571Increase 49.22Increase
3 / 10
1971 6,139Decrease 16.22Decrease
3 / 10
1973 25,709Increase 55.14Increase
5 / 12
1975 6,141Increase 12.41Decrease
3 / 12
1977 13,249Decrease 41.05Increase
3 / 12
1979 9,579Increase 18.76Increase
3 / 12
1981 7,291Decrease 28.29Decrease
2 / 12
1983 13,894Increase 15.38Decrease
3 / 15
1986 24,486Increase 6.95Decrease
2 / 15
0 / 12
2 / 27
1989 13,404Decrease 6.31Decrease
2 / 15
0 / 12
2 / 27
1991 9,045Decrease 9.45Increase
2 / 15
0 / 12
2 / 27

District Board/Council elections

Election Number of
popular votes
% of
popular votes
Total
elected seats
+/−
1982 13,644Steady 3.83Steady
2 / 132
1985 39,929Increase 5.77Increase
17 / 237
7Increase
1988 13,572Decrease 2.13Decrease
5 / 264
5Decrease
1991 2,136Decrease 0.40Decrease
1 / 272
5Decrease

References

  1. Reform Club of Hong Kong (1949). Memorandum and articles of Association of the Reform Club of Hong Kong : incorporated the 20th day of January, 1949. Ts'o & Hodgson.
  2. Jones, Catherine M. (1990). Promoting Prosperity: The Hong Kong Way of Social Policy. Chinese University Press. p. 78.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 10/19/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.