Richmond Sixteen

Richmond Castle

The Richmond Sixteen were a group of "absolutist" British conscientious objectors during the First World War. Conscripted into the British Army in 1916, they refused to undertake even non-combatant military duties. Brought together at Richmond Castle, Yorkshire, most not knowing each other previously, they were transported to France, where fifteen of them were court-martialled and formally sentenced to be executed by firing squad, but this sentence was immediately commuted to ten years' penal servitude. They were released in 1919.

The sixteen men

The group was made up of Quakers, Methodists, members of the Churches of Christ, International Bible Students (now known as Jehovah's Witnesses since 1931), and socialists. They were:

Norman Gaudie, centre forward of the reserve Sunderland Football Club, from East Boldon; Alfred Matthew Martlew, a clerk at Rowntree's chocolate factory in York, originally from Gainsborough, Lincolnshire; Herbert (Bert) George and William (Billy) Edwin Law, brothers from Darlington; Alfred Myers, an ironstone miner from Carlin How;[1] John Hubert (Bert) Brocklesby, schoolteacher and Methodist lay preacher, from Conisborough; Charles Ernest Cryer, from Cleveland; Robert Armstrong Lown, from Ely; and eight men from Leeds: Clarence and Stafford Hall, brothers and International Bible Students; Clifford Cartwright, from the Churches of Christ; Charles Rowland Jackson; Leonard Renton, an International Bible Student; John William Routledge; Charles Herbert Senior, an International Bible Student; and Ernest Shillito Spencer.[2][3][4]

Background

The First World War began with Austria-Hungary's declaration of war against Serbia on 28 July 1914, and after other states had joined in, the German invasion of Belgium led to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland declaring war against Germany on 4 August; the other countries of the British Empire quickly followed suit. By the winter of 1915, the British Army had suffered so many men killed or disabled that in January 1916 Parliament introduced conscription. The Military Service Act 1916 provided that in Great Britain (but not in Ireland, the whole of which was still part of the United Kingdom), single men aged between eighteen and forty-one were liable to call-up for war service in the Army; an amending Act later in 1916 included married men, and another in 1918 extended the upper age limit to fifty-one. There were exemptions for serving members of the Army and Navy, ministers of religion, those engaged in "work of national importance", men with dependents such as widowers with young children, and men who were disabled or in poor health. There was also provision for those with conscientious objections to fighting, often referred to as "COs": men could object on religious or moral grounds, but even if accepted as genuine conscientious objectors by the Tribunals set up under the Act, they could, at a tribunal's discretion, still be conscripted into the Army for non-combatant duties.[5]

Non-Combatant Corps

Thousands of men claiming to be conscientious objectors were questioned by the Military Service Tribunals, but very few were exempted from all war service. The vast majority were designated to fight or to join the Non-Combatant Corps (NCC), specially created exclusively for COs. For those accepted as having genuine moral or religious objections to fighting, being under military orders in the NCC was intended to make them support the war in non-fighting roles, such as transport or non-lethal stores. The relatively small number who refused such non-combatant duties were called "absolutists".[6]

The men who became the "Richmond Sixteen" had pleaded their objections to fighting and had all been accepted as conscientious objectors, and instead of being designated by their tribunals for fighting units they were designated as non-combatants. They conscientiously ignored notices to report to the NCC, so were arrested by the civil police and taken before a magistrates' court, where they were handed over to a military escort. Eventually they were taken to join the 2nd Northern Company of the Non-Combatant Corps, stationed at Richmond Castle, in the North Riding of Yorkshire. They refused to wear uniform or undertake any duties at all, as they had done ever since they had been "handed over", and were locked in eight small cells, pending court-martial for disobeying military orders. Similar disobedience by forcibly enlisted COs had been taking place over the past two months at military barracks and camps around the country, resulting in courts-martial and sentences of imprisonment.

France and imprisonment

At some level in the military hierarchy – some have suggested it was the Secretary of State for War in person, Field Marshal Kitchener – it was ordered that four random groups of the resisting COs, including what became the Richmond Sixteen (the others were seventeen at Harwich, nine at Seaford, and two at Kinmel Park, Abergele, making forty-two absolutists in all), be sent to the Western Front, where they could be court-martialled for refusing to obey orders and face the death penalty, which was not applicable for such an offence within Great Britain itself.[6] There is no evidence to corroborate later suggestions that the forty-two "Frenchmen", as they became known, went to France willingly, supposedly anxious to keep up their resistance on a greater stage.[7]

While the Richmond Sixteen were on a train travelling south, one of them addressed a letter to a fellow-Quaker, Arnold Rowntree, the member of parliament for York, writing about their predicament, and threw it out of the train window.[1] The letter quickly reached Rowntree, who took the matter up with Herbert Asquith, the British prime minister.[1]

On arrival in France, the men were moved from place to place, spending their time in a variety of guard rooms, sometimes lodged "on parole" in rest camps,[8] and were eventually held with other prisoners near Boulogne.[7] However, they suffered no "field punishments", as other conscientious objectors before them had done. At Boulogne they were told they were "in the presence of the enemy" and that disobeying orders could now result in their being shot as deserters. They were urged to join other COs who had accepted their assigned role in the NCC, however reluctantly, as not doing so could amount to suicide, and they were also informed that a previous group of objectors had saved their lives by deciding to obey military orders. The sixteen men were then given twenty-four hours' leave to make up their minds, and they considered their position at leisure, five of them even going swimming. All sixteen remained convinced that supporting the war in any way would be morally wrong, and as a group they decided to hold out, partly on principle and partly because they believed that agreeing to obey military orders would lead to other objectors being treated in the same way. However, one of the men decided to give in. The next day, the other fifteen continued to refuse to obey all orders and were returned to the guard room. They were then court martialled, found guilty, and on 14 June 1916 were sentenced to be shot at dawn, but this was immediately commuted to ten years' penal servitude. The other "Frenchmen" were similarly sentenced in separate courts-martial, except for seven who received shorter terms of imprisonment without any formal sentence of death.[8][9] The outcome was considered the result of the influence of Asquith, following the death of Kitchener at sea a week previously, on 7 June.[10]

The men were transferred to Rouen, from where they were sent back to England by ship, after facing an angry French crowd on the quay-side. From the ship they were taken to Winchester Prison, where they found the Harwich seventeen, who had been at Boulogne before them.[8] On 11 July 1917 Alfred Martlew was found drowned in the River Ouse, reported in a newspaper under the heading "An Objector Drowned".[9] The other men were released unconditionally in April 1919, well after the Armistice. On returning home, they were widely seen as cowards and were spurned by their local communities.[1] They were disfranchized for five years,[11] and some of them were unable to get jobs.[6]

Commemorations

In 1995, the men's story was turned into a Tyne Tees Television documentary called The Richmond Sixteen, and in 2007 they were one of the subjects of a book by Will Ellsworth-Jones.[2]

At Richmond Castle, early in the 21st century English Heritage laid out an area called the Cockpit Garden as a memorial to the men known as the Richmond Sixteen. However, the decision was controversial in Richmond, as the town's economy depends heavily on business from the nearby British army garrison at Catterick.[12] In June 2013 the Teesdale and Cleveland Area Quaker Meeting organized a silent event at Richmond Castle in honour of the sixteen men.[1] In May 2016 English Heritage announced plans to conserve the copious amounts of graffiti that the men had left on the walls of Richmond Castle. Most of this is in pencil and is deteriorating. [13]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Silence in castle to honour First World War conscientious objectors". The Northern Echo.
  2. 1 2 Gerhard Besier, Katarzyna Stokłosa, Jehovas Zeugen in Europa (LIT Verlag Münster, 2013) p. 95 (in German)
  3. ↑ Will Ellsworth-Jones, We Will Not Fight: The Untold Story of the First World War's Conscientious Objectors (2007), pp. 111, 115, 151
  4. ↑ "Loyally Supporting God's Government and No Other". JW.ORG.
  5. ↑ U.K. Military Service Act at firstworldwar.com, accessed 21 October 2014
  6. 1 2 3 Conscientious objectors in prison dated 4 November 2009 at news.bbc.co.uk, accessed 25 October 2014
  7. 1 2 Ellsworth-Jones (2007), p. 147
  8. 1 2 3 Norman Gaudie, extract from The courage that brings peace (1922), online at ppu.org.uk, accessed 19 October 2014
  9. 1 2 Sound Installation Concert at historyworks.tv, accessed 22 October 2014
  10. ↑ Duncan Brown, First World War Conscientious Objectors at Richmond Castle at english-heritage.org.uk, accessed 25 October 2014
  11. ↑ A. J. P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 116
  12. ↑ Guy McDonald, Cadogan Guide England (New Holland Publishers, 2004), p. 805
  13. ↑ "Conscientious Objectors at Richmond Castle - English Heritage".
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/6/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.