Gauss–Lucas theorem

In complex analysis, a branch of mathematics, the Gauss–Lucas theorem gives a geometrical relation between the roots of a polynomial P and the roots of its derivative P'. The set of roots of a real or complex polynomial is a set of points in the complex plane. The theorem states that the roots of P' all lie within the convex hull of the roots of P, that is the smallest convex polygon containing the roots of P. When P has a single root then this convex hull is a single point and when the roots lie on a line then the convex hull is a segment of this line. The Gauss–Lucas theorem, named after Carl Friedrich Gauss and Félix Lucas is similar in spirit to Rolle's theorem.

Formal statement

If P is a (nonconstant) polynomial with complex coefficients, all zeros of P' belong to the convex hull of the set of zeros of P.[1]

Special cases

It is easy to see that if P(x) = ax2 + bx + c is a second degree polynomial, the zero of P' (x) = 2ax + b is the average of the roots of P. In that case, the convex hull is the line segment with the two roots as endpoints and it is clear that the average of the roots is the middle point of the segment.

For a third degree complex polynomial P (cubic function) with three distinct zeros, Marden's theorem states that the zeros of P' are the foci of the Steiner inellipse which is the unique ellipse tangent to the midpoints of the triangle formed by the zeros of P.

For a fourth degree complex polynomial P (quartic function) with four distinct zeros forming a concave quadrilateral, one of the zeros of P lies within the convex hull of the other three; all three zeros of P' lie in two of the three triangles formed by the interior zero of P and two others zeros of P.[2]

In addition, if a polynomial of degree n of real coefficients has n distinct real zeros x_1<x_2<\cdots <x_n\,, we see, using Rolle's theorem, that the zeros of the derivative polynomial are in the interval [x_1,x_n]\, which is the convex hull of the set of roots.

The convex hull of the roots of the polynomial  p_n x^n+p_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots p_0 particularly includes the point -\frac{p_{n-1}}{n\cdot p_n}.

Proof

Over the complex numbers, P is a product of prime factors

 P(z)= \alpha \prod_{i=1}^n (z-a_i)

where the complex numbers a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n are the – not necessary distinct – zeros of the polynomial P, the complex number \alpha is the leading coefficient of P and n is the degree of P. Let z be any complex number for which P(z) \neq 0. Then we have for the logarithmic derivative

 \frac{P^\prime(z)}{P(z)}= \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{z-a_i}.

In particular, if z is a zero of P^\prime and P(z) \neq 0, then

 \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{z-a_i}=0\

or

\ \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\overline{z}-\overline{a_i} } {\vert z-a_i\vert^2}=0.

This may also be written as

 \left(\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{\vert z-a_i\vert^2}\right)\overline{z}=
\left(\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{1}{\vert z-a_i\vert^2}\overline{a_i}\right).

Taking their conjugates, we see that z is a weighted sum with positive coefficients that sum to one, or the barycenter on affine coordinates, of the complex numbers a_i (with different mass assigned on each root whose weights collectively sum to 1).

If P(z)=P^\prime(z)=0, then z=1\cdot z+0\cdot a_i, and is still a convex combination of the roots of P.

See also

Notes

  1. Marden (1966), Theorem (6,1).
  2. A. Rüdinger (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0689

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/30/2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.