Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act

Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act
Great Seal of the United States
Full title To reaffirm that certain land has been taken into trust for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatami Indians, and for other purposes.
Introduced in 113th United States Congress
Introduced on October 29, 2013
Sponsored by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D, MI)
Number of Co-Sponsors 1
Agencies affected United States Department of the Interior
Legislative history

The Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act (S. 1603) is a bill that would reaffirm the status of lands taken into trust by the Department of the Interior (DOI) for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians in the state of Michigan.[1][2]

The bill was introduced and passed by the United States Senate during the 113th United States Congress.

Background

In 2009, the Supreme Court held in Carcieri v. Salazar that the term "now under Federal jurisdiction" referred only to tribes that were federally recognized when the Indian Reorganization Act[3] became law, and the federal government could not take land into trust from tribes that were recognized after 1934.[4] This bill would clarify that the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band's land trust could not be challenged in court under this Supreme Court decision.[5]

Provisions of the bill

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source.[6]

The Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act would ratify and confirms the actions of the Secretary of the Interior in taking specified land into trust for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians.[6]

The bill would reaffirm that land as trust land.[6]

The bill would prohibit an action relating to that land from being filed or maintained in a federal court.[6]

Congressional Budget Office report

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Budget Office, as ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs on May 21, 2014. This is a public domain source.[1]

S. 1603 would reaffirm the status of lands taken into trust by the Department of the Interior (DOI) for the benefit of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians in the state of Michigan. The legislation also would prohibit any lawsuits related to the trust land. In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that DOI lacked the authority to take nearly 150 acres into trust.[1]

Based on information provided by DOI, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that implementing the legislation would have no significant effect on the federal budget. The legislation would not significantly increase the cost of managing tribal trust lands. Enacting S. 1603 would not affect direct spending or revenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply.[1]

S. 1603 contains an intergovernmental and private-sector mandate as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) because it would end rights of action for public and private entities that are currently able to pursue legal actions related to the land held in trust for the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians. The bill would prohibit any action relating to the trust land from being brought or maintained in a federal court. The cost of the mandate would be any forgone compensation that would have been awarded through legal actions.[1]

The state of Michigan and several local governments have entered into an agreement with the tribe related to the use of the land, and CBO believes it is unlikely that, absent the bill, any other public entity would bring an action that would result in significant compensation. Therefore, CBO estimates the cost of the intergovernmental mandate would not exceed the annual threshold established in UMRA for such mandates ($76 million, in 2014, adjusted annually for inflation).[1]

Private entities, however, have no such agreement, and the bill would extinguish all rights to legal actions relating to the trust lands. Awards in such claims are in many cases limited to the value of the land. Because of the commercial properties located on the trust land, the value of awards related to those lands could be significant. However, because both the number of claims that could be barred or terminated and the value of forgone compensation stemming from those claims are uncertain, CBO has no basis for estimating the cost of the mandate. Therefore, CBO cannot determine whether the cost of the private-sector mandate would exceed the annual threshold established in UMRA for such mandates ($152 million, in 2014, adjusted annually for inflation).[1]

Procedural history

The Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act was introduced into the United States Senate on October 29, 2013 by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D, MI).[7] The bill was referred to the United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. The committee held a hearing about the bill on May 7, 2014.[8] On June 19, 2014, the Senate voted to pass the bill with unanimous consent.[7][2]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "CBO - S. 1603". Congressional Budget Office. 17 June 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  2. 1 2 Cox, Ramsey (19 June 2014). "Senate passes land trust bill for Pottawatomi Indians". The Hill. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  3. ↑ Wheeler-Howard Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 988
  4. ↑ Donald L. Carcieri, et al. v. Ken L. Salazar, et al., 555 U.S. 379 (2009)
  5. ↑ "Senate Indian Affairs Committee business meeting and hearing". Indianz.com. 19 May 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "S. 1603 - Summary". United States Congress. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  7. 1 2 "S. 1603 - All Actions". United States Congress. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  8. ↑ "Indian Affairs Senate Committee to Host Hearing on Trust Land Legislation". Native News Online. 7 May 2014. Retrieved 20 June 2014.

External links

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

 This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the United States Government.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 1/23/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.