Land reform in Scotland

Land reform in Scotland is an ongoing process whose goal is to end the historic legacy of feudal law. It formally began in 2003 and continues as of 2016.

Land ownership in Scotland

Scotland's land issues are rooted in two processes that happened in the 18th and 19th centuries, especially in the Scottish Highlands:

The Crofters' Holdings (Scotland) Act 1886 intended to protect the farmers' rights, but it was too weak to have any effect.

The Scotland land reform aims to balance the land-ownership situation by:

Preparations

During the Scottish devolution (1997-1998), a Land Reform Policy Group (LRPG) was established under the chairmanship of Lord Sewel. After extensive public consultation, the LRPG published a set of proposals for land reform (1999).

In 2000, the Scottish Feudal Law from the 11th century, which protected the sanctity of large holdings, was officially cancelled.

In the same year, the Scottish Land Fund was established, in order to help communities buy their land from their landlords.

In 2001, a Draft Land Reform Bill was published. It was accepted as an Act two years later.[3]

The 2003 Acts

The Land Reform Act 2003[4] has three parts: unhindered access to open countryside, rights for communities to buy their land when the landowner puts it to sell, and rights of crofting communities to buy their land even without the consent of the landowner. The latter decisively changes the balance of power between the crofting community and the landowner.

1. The first part formalized the tradition in Scotland of unhindered access to open countryside. It created a framework for responsible access to land and inland water,[5] formalizing the tradition in Scotland of unhindered access to open countryside, provided that care was taken not to cause damage or interfere with activities including farming and game stalking. Similar legislation was passed for England and Wales with the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000. This aspect of the Act follows the distinctive approach set out in the Outdoor Access Code, specifying the rights and responsibilities of land managers, countryside users and recreational managers.[6]

2. The second part established the Community Right to Buy[7] in order to allow communities with a population of less than 10,000 in Scotland to apply to register an interest in land and the opportunity to buy that land when it comes up for sale.

3. The third part of the Act gives crofting communities the right to buy,[8] in other words to acquire and control the croft land where they live and work and to acquire the interest of the tenant in tenanted land (interposed lease). It decisively changes the balance of power between the crofting community and the landowner. The major distinguishing feature of the crofting community right to buy is that it is a right which can be exercised at any time. It does not depend on the land being for sale, as under the community right to buy. In effect it is a forced sale and in that respect has something in common with a compulsory purchase.

The Agricultural Holdings Act 2003[9] amends the law relating to agricultural holdings under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991. It provides for new forms of agricultural tenancies and makes provision in relation to these tenancies. It provides for the right of certain agricultural tenants to buy land. It provides for the use of certain agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes. It makes special provision for certain agricultural tenancies where the tenant is a partnership. It makes new provision for the resolution of disputes between landlords and tenants arising under agricultural tenancies.[9]

The Salvesen v Riddell case, 2012-2013

A section of the Agricultural Holdings Act has been challenged and cancelled by the Supreme Court of the UK. [10]

The trigger to this ruling was an appeal by Salvensen, the owner of Peaston Farm near Ormiston. The Riddells were tenants in this farm. Section 72, 2003 Act greatly restricted the ability of landowners to terminate the tenancies of their tenants. Initially, the start date of this restriction was set to 4 February 2003. This led many landlords, including Salvensen, to terminate the tenancies of their tenants the day before - 3 February 2003. A later amendment to section 72 retroactively set the start date of the restrictions to 16 September 2002, which made Salvensen's termination notice ineffective.

Salvensen applied to the Land Court, which repealed his application. He then appealed to the Court of Session and obtained permission to apply to the UK Supreme Court. His main claim was that Section 72 is incompatible with his property rights - the rights guaranteed to him by Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal. It found that Mr. Salvesen’s A1P1 rights were violated by section 72(10) of the 2003 Act and that this provision is outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament under the Scotland Act 1998. Therefore, the suspended the effect of this finding effectively until the defect is corrected.

This case is considered significant from a public law perspective.[11][12]

The 2016 Act

During 2014-2015, the Scottish government conducted a public consultation about the future of land reform in Scotland.[13] Based on this consultation, the Land Reform Act 2016 was legislated.[14] [15] This rule added the following.[16][17]

4. New protections for tenant farmers against eviction.[18] There is a new form of limited duration lease: tenants will be able to assign or bequeath their leases to a wider range of people, a change that supporters say will encourage transfers to a new generation of farmers but which landowners say will discourage them from making farms available for rent.

5. An end to a two-decade-old exemption from business tax rates enjoyed by shooting and deerstalking estates.

6. A new Scottish Land Fund opening on 1 April 2016 with £10m available to help community buy-outs.

7. Increasing transparency of land ownership and control through a public register.

Criticism

Criticism by landlords

Naturally, many landlords oppose the reform. Some of their arguments are:[2][19]

Criticism by reform activists

Several parts of the Bill have been criticized as follows:[20]

Land-reform activists claim that the current reform is insufficient as several important amendments were voted down by SNP and Conservative backbenchers, including:[16]

Criticism by law experts

In a 2016 article in the Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, Douglas Maxwell claims the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill contains poorly-defined terms such as "sustainable development" and "communities" which may place the bill in conflict with international human rights laws, particularly the ECHR Protocol 1, article 1.[21]

Community focus

The Scottish land reform is unique in its emphasis on community. Most other land reforms have focused on giving land ownership rights to individual farmers. In contrast, the Scotland Land Reform Act gives a collective right-to-buy to whole communities living in the same area. This feature was praised by several authors. [3] [22]


See also

References

  1. Sellar, W. David H. (2007). "The great land debate and the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003". Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography. 60: 100. doi:10.1080/00291950500535251.
  2. 1 2 "Imagine a feudal country where 432 families own half the land. Welcome to Scotland". 2013-08-01. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  3. 1 2 3 Bryden, John; Geisler, Charles (2007). "Community-based land reform: Lessons from Scotland". Land Use Policy. 24: 24. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.004.
  4. "Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003". Legislation.gov.uk. 2013-02-25. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
  5. "Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 - Explanatory Notes". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
  6. "Progressive Property in Action: The Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 by John A. Lovett :: SSRN". Papers.ssrn.com. Retrieved 2015-07-10.
  7. "Community Right to Buy in Scotland". Scottish Government. 24 March 2016. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
  8. "Crofting Community Right to Buy". Scottish Government. 7 July 2015. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
  9. 1 2 "Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003". Legislation.gov.uk. 2003-04-22. Retrieved 2016-10-31. This content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright.
  10. Lord Hope, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Toulson (24 April 2013). "Salvesen v Riddell and another, Lord Advocate intervening (Scotland)". Uk Supreme Court. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  11. Mark Eliott (2013-04-25). "The legal status of unlawful legislation: Salvesen v Riddell [2013] UKSC 22".
  12. Gemma Mckinlay (2015-01-29). "The case that keeps surprising – Salvesen v Riddell". Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  13. Land Reform Team (2015). "A Consultation on the future of Land Reform in Scotland".
  14. "Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2016". Legislation.gov.uk. 2014-03-28. Retrieved 2015-07-10.
  15. "Land Reform in Scotland". Scottish Government website. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  16. 1 2 "A new dawn for land reform in Scotland?". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  17. "Holyrood approves sweeping Scottish land reforms". Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  18. "Scottish farmer facing eviction wins last-minute reprieve". Retrieved 26 October 2016.
  19. Auslan Cramb (2015-12-18). "Property rights threatened by 'aggressive' change in land reform bill". The Telegraph. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  20. MacInnes, Megan; Shields, Kirsteen (2015). "The Land Reform (Scotland) Bill and Human Rights: Key Points and Recommendations". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2698578.
  21. Douglas Maxwell (2016-01-18). "Human rights and land reform: unanswered questions".
  22. Hoffman, Matthew (2013). "Why community ownership? Understanding land reform in Scotland". Land Use Policy. 31: 289. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.013.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/17/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.