Shaun Greenhalgh

This article is about the British art forger. For the Canadian lacrosse player, see Sean Greenhalgh.
Shaun Greenhalgh
Born

1961 (age 54–55)


Bromley Cross, Lancashire, England, UK

Criminal charge Conspiracy to commit fraud, money laundering
Criminal penalty 4 years 8 months in prison
Criminal status Released
Parent(s) George and Olive Greenhalgh

Shaun Greenhalgh (born 1961) is a British art forger. Over a seventeen-year period, between 1989 and 2006, he produced a large number of forgeries. Teaming up with his brother and elderly parents, who fronted the sales side of the operation, he successfully sold his fakes internationally to museums, auction houses, and private buyers, accruing nearly £1 million.[1]

The family have been described by Scotland Yard as "possibly the most diverse forgery team in the world, ever". However, when they attempted to sell three Assyrian reliefs using the same provenance as they had previously, suspicions were raised. Apprehended, Shaun Greenhalgh was sentenced to prison for four years and eight months in November 2007.[2]

The Victoria and Albert Museum in London held an exhibition of Greenhalgh's "works" from 23 January to 7 February 2010.[3]

The Metropolitan Police’s art and antiques unit built a replica model of the shed where the "works" were created and labelled Greenhalgh "the most diverse art forger known in history". Many of his fakes, including the Amarna Princess, Risley Park Lanx, and works by Barbara Hepworth and Thomas Moran, were displayed.[4]

Family roles

Greenhalgh's family was involved in "the garden shed gang". They established an elaborate cottage industry at his parents' house in The Crescent, Bromley Cross, South Turton, which is about 3.5 miles (6 km) north of Bolton town centre.[3] His parents, George and Olive, approached clients, while his older brother, George, Jr., managed the money.[5][6][7]

Other members of the family were invoked to help establish the legitimacy of the various items. These included Olive's father who owned an art gallery,[8] a great-grandfather who it seemed had had the foresight to buy well at auctions,[2] and an ancestor who had apparently worked for the Mayor of Bolton as a cleaner and was given a Moran painting.[5]

Shaun Greenhalgh left school at 16 with no qualifications.[9] A self-taught artist, undoubtedly influenced by his job as an antiques dealer, he worked up his forgeries from sketches, photographs, art books and catalogues.[2][5][10] He attempted a wide range of crafts, from painting in pastels and watercolours, to sketches, and sculpture, both modern and ancient, busts and statues, to bas-relief and metalwork. He invested in a vast range of different materials - silver, stone, marble, rare stone, replica metal, and glass.[2][5] He also did meticulous research to authenticate his items with histories and provenance (for instance, faking letters from the supposed artists) in order to demonstrate his ownership.[11] Completed items were then stored about the house and garden shed. The latter probably served as a workshop as well.

A quote from an amazed Scotland Yard detective who searched the house gives a sense of Greenhalgh's industry:

“ There were blocks of stone, a furnace for melting silver on top of the fridge, half-finished and rejected sculptures, a watercolour under the bed, a cheque for £20,000 dated 1993, and a bust of an American president in the loft. I’d never seen anything like it.[2] ”

A next-door neighbour recalled: "I was finding bits of pottery and coins around the edges of the garden over 20 years back - [things like] bits of metal with old kings on."[12] While this sounds as though materials were openly displayed, it was perhaps not quite that obvious. Angela Thomas, a curator from the Bolton Museum, actually visited the family at home prior to the purchase of the Amarna Princess and reported nothing untoward.[11]

Yet for all his daring – he once boasted that he could knock up a Moran watercolour in half an hour[5] and claimed to have completed an Amarna statue in three weeks – Shaun Greenhalgh needed the help of his parents.[11] At the trial it was said by the lawyer, Brian McKenna, that his mother, Olive (b. 1925), made the phonecalls "because he was shy and did not like to use the telephone."[13]

Olive may have been a peripheral figure,[13] but Shaun's father, George (born 1923), was more involved. He was the frontman, who met face-to-face with potential buyers. "He looks honest, he's elderly and he shows up in a wheelchair."[14] On one occasion, trying to interest the Bolton Museum in an Amarna princess, an ancient Egyptian statuette about the size of a gnome, George Sr. told them he was "thinking about using it as a garden ornament".[5]

The parents were perhaps most important because they helped establish a logical explanation for why the Greenhalghs had possession of such items in the first place, namely as family heirlooms. It allowed them to offload items when they were discovered as fakes, such as the "Eadred Reliquary", and an L.S. Lowry painting, "The Meeting House".[2][11][15][16]

The "Amarna Princess"

Main article: Amarna Princess

In 1999 the Greenhalghs began their most ambitious project yet.[5] They bought an 1892 catalogue which listed the contents of an auction in Silverton Park, Devon, the home of the 4th Earl of Egremont. Among the items listed were "eight Egyptian figures."[17] Using the leeway this vague description allowed, Greenhalgh manufactured what became called the "Amarna Princess," a 20-inch statue, apparently made of a "stunning translucent alabaster, it later emerged within a Panorama documentary that he had bought the tools to produce this "masterpiece" from B&Q."[15] Done in the Egyptian "Amarna period" style of 1350 BC, the statue represents one of the daughters of the Pharaoh Akhenaten and Queen Nefertiti. At the time, as Greenhalgh had researched, only two other similar statuettes were known to exist in the world.[5][18] He "knocked up" his copy in his shed in three weeks out of calcite, "using basic DIY tools and making it look old by coating it in a mixture of tea and clay".[5][15]

George then approached Bolton Museum in 2002,[13] claiming the Amarna was from his grandfather’s "forgotten collection", bought at the Silverton Park auction.[2] He pretended to be ignorant about its true worth or value, but was careful to provide the letters Shaun had also faked, showing how the artefact had been in the family for "a hundred years".[5][15]

In 2003, after consulting experts at the British Museum and Christie's, the Bolton Museum bought the Amarna Princess for £439,767. It remained on display until February 2006.[13]

How they were caught

Perhaps buoyed up by the fact that they had so successfully duped the experts, the Greenhalghs tried again using the same Silverton Park provenance. They produced what were purportedly three Assyrian reliefs of soldier and horses, from the Palace of Sennacherib in 600 BC.[5]

The British Museum examined them in November 2005, concluded that they were genuine, and expressed an interest in buying one of them, which seemed to match a drawing by A. H. Layard in its collection. However, when two of the reliefs were submitted to Bonhams auction house, its antiquities consultant Richard Falkiner spotted "an obvious fake".[19] Bonhams consulted with the British Museum about various suspicious aspects, and the Museum then spotted several unlikely anomalies. The horses' reins were "not consistent"[14] or "atypical" with respect to other Assyrian reliefs; and the cuneiform inscription contained a spelling mistake,[5] an absent diacritical mark, which was considered extremely unlikely in a piece "destined for the eyes of the king". These concerns became full blown suspicion when George seemed too willing to part with the items at a low price.[10] The Museum contacted the Arts and Antiquities Unit of Scotland Yard, and eighteen months later the family was arrested.

Monies involved

Had the Greenhalghs managed to sell all 120 artworks they had offered it is estimated that they could have earned as much as £10m.[2][5] This would have made the average value of each piece more than £83,000, although monies received varied between £100 (for the Eadred Reliquary) and £440,000 (for the Amarna Princess). The Greenhalghs did not manage to offload most of their works. Many which they did sell, such as the Eadred Reliquary, purportedly were undersold, garnering only minimal amounts. Others, such as the Lowry painting "The Meeting House" only gained in value from their repeated resale, which would not have benefited the Greenhalghs. As time went on, more ambitious, expensive pieces of work were produced, some of which did sell, like the Risley Park Lanx. However, these were subject to more scrutiny and indeed it was one of these, the Assyrian reliefs, which led to their exposure and arrests, which suggests that the longevity of their scam was concentrated on the passing off of lower level items.[20]

Balanced against this must be the success of sales to private individuals. They are unlikely to have had the same level of expertise at their disposal as institutions, and are probably less willing to advertise their losses once the forgeries were detected. Certainly they have not had the same exposure as the debacle surrounding the Bolton Museum, for example.[11] Two individual buyers, "wealthy Americans" have been noticed, but only after they donated their purchase to the British Museum.[5] Another piece sold to an unnamed private buyer came to light when the Art Institute of Chicago announced that The Faun, a ceramic sculpture on display since 1997 as the work of the 19th-century French master Paul Gauguin, was also a forgery by Shaun Greenhalgh. The museum purchased the sculpture from a private dealer in London, who had bought it at a Sotheby's auction in 1994.[21]

In addition, the bank records of the Greenhalghs only went back six years,[18] so in the final analysis the exact amount of monies involved over the seventeen-year scam has not been determined. What is known is that "two Halifax accounts... one containing £55,173 and the other £303,646" were frozen, pending a confiscation hearing in January 2008, and Shaun Greenhalgh was convicted for "conspiracy to conceal and transfer £410,392."[13] Estimates of the amount of money the Greenhalghs actually made vary from £850,000 to £1.5 million.[5][14]

Motivations

The Greenhalgh family did not appear to make much use of the money they gained. They lived a "far from lavish life"[2] in a "shabby"[5] council house; among their possessions were "an old TV, battered sofa, and a Ford Focus", but not a computer.[2][15] According to Detective Sergeant Vernon Rapley, from the Met's Art and Antiques Unit, the conditions were "relatively frugal" even "abject poverty".[18] Olive Greenhalgh claimed that she had "not even travelled outside of Bolton."[15]

As they did not display wealth, explanations other than desire for money have been proposed. Police suggested that Shaun Greenhalgh was motivated less by profit than by resentment at his own lack of recognition as an artist. This "general hatred"[15] became a need to "shame the art world" and "show them up". On the other hand, defence lawyer Andrew Nutall characterized Shaun Greenhalgh as a shy, introverted person, obsessed with "one outlook and that was his garden shed". The forgeries were an attempt to "perfect the love he had for such arts". By implication, the forgeries were a mere unintended, if unfortunate, consequence.[18]

Known forgeries

Greenhalgh's The Faun, which was passed off for a sculpture by Gauguin

44 forgeries were discussed during the trial, and 120 were known to have been presented to various institutions.[2][13] However, given the family's bank records only extended back for a third of the period they were operating, and Shaun Greenhalgh's high level of productivity, there are probably many more. On raiding the Greenhalgh home police discovered many raw materials and "scores of sculptures, paintings and artefacts, hidden in wardrobes, under their bed and in the garden shed."[14] In fact, "there can be little doubt that there are a number of forgeries still circulating within the art market."[18]

A description of known forgeries includes the following:

Reactions

In the end, Greenhalgh's artistic ability was downplayed. Detective Sgt Rapley of the Metropolitan Police Arts and Antiquities Unit said "Looking at them now I'm not sure the items would fool anyone, it was the credibility of the provenances that went with them."[15] Despite this claim the list of experts and institutions who were fooled is long, and includes the Tate Modern,[5] the British Museum, the Henry Moore Institute, and auction houses Bonhams, Christie's, Sotheby's and other experts from "Leeds to Vienna."[18] The Faun was displayed at the van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam;[26] while the Amarna Princess went on display at the South Bank Hayward Art Gallery, in an exhibition opened by the Queen.[7] Other unnamed galleries, and various private collectors were fooled as well.[5]

In fact, institutions proclaimed the works and their achievement in obtaining them. The Art Institute of Chicago described The Faun sculpture as a "major rediscovery" and included it in their "definitive" exhibition on Gauguin.[26] Bolton Museum hailed their purchase of the Amarna Princess as "a coup," calling George Greenhalgh "a nice old man who had no idea of the significance of what he owned."[11]

After the trial, Bolton Museum scrambled to distance itself and described itself as "blameless"[11] insisting that it had followed established procedure.[13] The presiding judge, William Morris, exonerated the institution and any Council staff involved, preferring to focus on what he saw as "misapplied" talent and an "ambitious conspiracy;"[13] while the Metropolitan Police Arts and Antiquities Unit would only admit that Greenhalgh had succeeded "to a degree".[18] However, the general public was notably more cynical in its reaction, being unimpressed by what they perceived as the experts' incompetence, and the law's heavy-handedness.[2][29] Richard Falkiner, the antiquities expert from Bonhams said, "I took one look at the relief and said 'don't make me laugh'...It was an obvious fake. It was far too freshly cut, was made of the wrong stone and was stylistically wrong for the period."[19]

"The Antiques Rogue Show"

On 4 January 2009, BBC2 broadcast a dramatisation of the Greenhalgh story called The Antiques Rogue Show, a play on the title of the popular BBC series Antiques Road Show,[30] already used by headline writers. In a letter from prison to the Bolton News, Shaun Greenhalgh made a number of complaints about the depiction of himself and his family, calling the drama "character assassination".[31]

Career after release

Following Shaun Greenhalgh's release early in 2010, he launched a website selling his artworks. These comprise works the website describes as "examples of my old style of work...'fakes'", signed and sold as works by him, as well as sculptures in his own style. A member of the Metropolitan Police Art and Antique Squad stated "If a work is not copyrighted, it is not illegal to copy that work and sell that copy, as long as it is made very clear the work is not an original."[32] Shaun Greenhalgh appears in and is credited as 'Craftsman' in the BBC documentary The Dark Ages: An Age of Light, episode # 4.

In November 2015, as his book A Forger's Tale was being promoted, Greenhalgh claimed authorship of a disputed Leonardo da Vinci work, known as La Bella Principessa, which he said he made in the late 1970s, around the age of 20, using vellum recycled from a 16th-century land deed. Greenhalgh said the woman's face is that of a supermarket check-out girl named Alison who worked in Bolton.[33]

Images

Pictures of the family can be found attached with most articles cited. The best source of images of the forgeries themselves is the BBC article.[15] Those available include:

Also included in the BBC article:

References

  1. ↑ The Guardian "How garden shed fakers fooled the art world", 16 November 2007.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Times Online (no byline). "The £10m art collection that was forged by a family in their garden shed in Bolton", 17 November 2007.
  3. 1 2 "Armana Pricess: "I dismantled art forgers work without realising"". Bolton News. 19 December 2009. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  4. ↑ "The Metropolitan Police Service's Investigation of Fakes and Forgeries - V&A future exhibitions". Victoria and Albert Museum. Retrieved 22 December 2009.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "The artful codgers: pensioners who conned British museums with £10m forgeries". This is London. 16 November 2007.
  6. ↑ Smith, Amanda (21 April 2007). "£1m fake statue: family charged". The Bolton News.
  7. 1 2 Stokes, Paul (1 August 2007). "Family sells fake Egyptian statue for £400,000". The Daily Telegraph.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Chadwick, Edward (17 November 2007). "Antiques Rogues Show: Update 3". The Bolton News.
  9. 1 2 Chadwick, Edward (21 November 2007). "Con artist set to appeal". The Bolton News.
  10. 1 2 Milmo, Cahal (19 November 2007). "Family of forgers fool art world with beautifully crafted fakes". New Zealand Herald.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Linton, Deborah. "Family con that fooled the art world", Manchester Evening News, 16 November 2007.
  12. 1 2 3 Grove, Sophie. "Fake It Till You Make It", Newsweek, 15 December 2007.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Chadwick, Edward. "Antiques rogues show update", The Bolton News, 17 November 2007.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 "Elderly couple, son sentenced for creating knockoff art and antiques for 17 years". International Herald Tribune. 16 November 2007.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kelly, James (17 November 2007). "Fraudsters who resented the art market". BBC News.
  16. ↑ See also discussion of this in Reactions section.
  17. ↑ Malvern, Jack. "The ancient Egypt statue from Bolton (circa 2003)", Times Online, 27 Mar 2006.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ward, David (17 November 2007). "How garden shed fakers fooled the art world". The Guardian.
  19. 1 2 3 Macquisten, Ivan. "It was Bonhams and ATG columnist who first raised alarm over Greenhalgh fakes", Antiques Trade Gazette, 3 December 2007.
  20. ↑ Thompson, Clive. "How to make a fake", New York Magazine, 24 May 2004; accessed 26 December 2007.
  21. ↑ Artner, Alan. "Art Institute of Chicago discloses Gauguin sculpture in fact a forgery", Chicago Tribune, 12 December 2007.
  22. 1 2 Bunyan, Paul (18 November 2007). "Downfall of council house art fakers". The Daily Telegraph.
  23. 1 2 Flynn, Tom. "Faking It" (PDF). Art Quarterly (Summer 2007).
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 Pallister, David. "Background:'The antique road show,", Guardian, 28 January 2008.
  25. ↑ Bolton Museum, (no byline). "Amarna Princess statement", Bolton Museum, 29 November 2007.
  26. 1 2 3 Bailey, Martin (12 December 2007). "Revealed: Art Institute of Chicago Gaugain sculpture is fake". The Art Newspaper.
  27. 1 2 Milmo, Cahal (17 November 2007). "Family of forgers fooled art world with array of finely crafted". The Independent. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
  28. ↑ Lovell, Jeremy (17 November 2007). "Octogenarian British art forger sentenced". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  29. ↑ See those articles which allow comments, for example, Chadwick, Edward. "Antiques rogues show update"
  30. ↑ "BBC programme details".
  31. ↑ Paul Keavaney (27 January 2009). "I do not believe my family has been portrayed fairly". The Bolton News.
  32. ↑ "Bolton Evening News article". 2 December 2011.
  33. ↑ Reyburn, Scott (December 4, 2015). "An Art World Mystery Worthy of Leonardo". The New York Times. Retrieved December 6, 2015.

Sources

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/3/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.