Interpersonal psychoanalysis

Part of a series of articles on
Psychoanalysis
Schools of thought
  • Psychology portal

Interpersonal psychoanalysis is based on the theories of American psychiatrist Harry Stack Sullivan (1892–1949). Sullivan believed that the details of a patient's interpersonal interactions with others can provide insight into the causes and cures of mental disorder.[1][2]

Current practitioners stress such features as the detailed description of clinical experience, the mutuality of the interpersonal process, and the not-knowing of the analyst.[3]

Sullivan and the neo-Freudians

Along with other neo-Freudian practitioners of interpersonal psychoanalysis, such as Horney, Fromm, Thompson and Fromm-Reichman Sullivan repudiated Freudian drive theory.[4]

They, like Sullivan, also shared the interdisciplinary emphasis that was to be an important part of the legacy of interpersonal psychoanalysis, influencing counsellors, clergymen, social workers and more.[5]

Selective inattention

Sullivan proposed that patients could keep certain aspects or components of their interpersonal relationships out of their awareness by a psychological behavior described as selective inattention - a term that has to a degree passed into common usage.

A defence mechanism that functions prior to psychological repression, and acts by way of blocking all notice of the threat in question, selective inattention can also be accompanied by selective non-participation.[6]

Both defences as used by patients may be usefully identified by the analyst through examination of his/her countertransference.[7]

Personifications

Sullivan emphasized that psychotherapists' analyses should focus on patients' relationships and personal interactions in order to obtain knowledge of what he called personifications – one's internalised views of self and others, one's internal schemata.[8]

Such analyses would consist of detailed questioning regarding moment-to-moment personal interactions, even including those with the analyst himself.

Personifications can form the basis for what Sullivan called parataxic distortions of the interpersonal field – distortions similar to those described as the products of transference and projective identification in orthodox psychoanalysis.[9] As with the latter, parataxic distortion can, if identified by the analyst, prove fruitful clues to the nature of the patient's inner world.[10]

Criticism

Sullivan has been criticised for inventing (sometimes opaque) neologisms for established psychoanalytic concepts, to claim a perhaps spurious intellectual independence.[11]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
  2. ↑ Evans, F. Barton (1996). Harry Stack Sullivan: Interpersonal Theory and Psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
  3. ↑ Arthur H. Feiner, Interpersonal Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Relevance (2000) p. 22-6 and p. 44
  4. ↑ Paul Brinich/Christopher Shelley, The Self and Personality Structure (Buckingham 2002) p. 65
  5. ↑ Brinich, Self p. 64
  6. ↑ A. & J. Rosen, Frozen Dreams (2005) p. 108 and 115
  7. ↑ Rosen, p. 104
  8. ↑ Paul Brinich/Christopher Shelley, The Self and Personality Structure (Buckingham 2002) p. 65
  9. ↑ Brinich, Self p. 65
  10. ↑ S. R. Welt/W. G. Herron, Narcissism and the Psychotherapist (1990) p. 121-2
  11. ↑ B. F. Evans, in Brinich, Self p. 65

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 5/24/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.