Massachusetts Comprehensive Permits and Regional Planning Initiative

General elections

General elections
1960 1962 1964 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Federal government

Presidential elections
1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016
U.S. Senate elections
Class 1 1898 1904 1910 1916 1922 1928 1934 1940 1946 1952 1958 1964 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 2012 Class 2 1918 1924 1930 1936 1942 1948 1954 1960 1966 1972 1978 1984 1990 1996 2002 2008 2014
U.S. House elections
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Special elections
Senate, 1944 Senate, 1962 1st district, 1991 9th district, 2001 5th district, 2007 Senate, 2010 Senate, 2013 5th district, 2013

State government

Gubernatorial elections
1839 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018
State Senate elections
2004 2006 2008
State House elections
2006 2008
Governor's Council elections
2006

Ballot measures

1980
Proposition 2½
2002
English Language Education in Public Schools
2008
Greyhound Protection Sensible Marijuana Policy State Income Tax Repeal
2010
No Sales Tax for Alcohol Sales Tax Relief Comprehensive Permits and Regional Planning
2012
Right to Repair Death with Dignity Medical Marijuana
2014
Automatic Gas Tax Increase Repeal Expansion of Bottle Deposits Casino Repeal Paid Sick Days

Boston

Mayoral elections
1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013
City council elections
2009 2011

The Massachusetts Comprehensive Permits and Regional Planning Initiative, also known as Question 2, appeared on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the state of Massachusetts as an initiative. Question 2 was rejected by the Massachusetts voters by 1,254,759 “No” votes to 900,405 “Yes” votes.^[1] The measure had been sponsored by Better Not Bigger, a local advocacy group in the state.^[2]^[3]^[4]

The proposed measure would have repealed a state law, the Comprehensive Permit Act (MGL ch. 40B), that allows an organization that is proposing to build government-subsidized housing that includes “low- or moderate-income units to apply for a single comprehensive permit from a city or town’s zoning board of appeals.” According to the official summary of the measure, the repeal would take effect on January 1, 2011. According to Chemaly, "It's not based on helping poor people. It's all about how can we sell as many units as possible and for them to still be federally and legally (dubbed) affordable" ^[5]

Details of Chapter 40B include:^[6]

It became a law in 1969.
Allows developers to avoid local zoning limits if they agree to reserve some of their projects for moderate-income residents.
About 25 percent of the units must be set aside for moderate-income residents to meet this requirement.
Local areas can reject projects if 10 percent or more of their housing stock is deemed affordable.
If local towns or cities are making progress toward said 10 percent mark, they can still reject projects.

Legislative history

The initiative was reviewed by the Massachusetts Legislature. The Massachusetts Legislature did not approve of the initiative by the May 4, 2010 deadline, according to the Massachusetts Elections Division, leaving petition organizers to obtain additional signatures from about 1/2 of 1% of voters who voted in the last governor election and submit them before or on July 7, 2010. According to the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office, that number amounted to 11,099 signatures. The measure submitted enough signatures to be placed on the ballot.^[5]^[7]

Text of measure

Summary

The summary of the measure reads:^[8]

This proposed law would repeal an existing state law that allows a qualified organization wishing to build government-subsidized housing that includes low- or moderate-income units to apply for a single comprehensive permit from a city or town's zoning board of appeals (ZBA), instead of separate permits from each local agency or official having jurisdiction over any aspect of the proposed housing. The repeal would take effect on January 1, 2011, but would not stop or otherwise affect any proposed housing that had already received both a comprehensive permit and a building permit for at least one unit ...

A YES VOTE would repeal the state law allowing the issuance of a single comprehensive permit to build housing that includes low- or moderate-income units.

A NO VOTE would make no change in the state law allowing issuance of such a comprehensive permit.

Support

Supporters

Affordable Housing Now-Yes on 2 is the main campaign for the measure.
Bigger Not Better^[4]

Arguments

Massachusetts has become the 3rd most expensive state in the country!
Chapter 40B, has been in place for more than 40 years and is directly responsible for our lack of affordability.

Opposition

Opponents

The Campaign to Protect the Affordable Housing Law.
Worcester Mayor Joseph C. O'Brien.^[9]

Financing

The following contributions have been made in opposition to the measure:^[10]

Contributor	Amount
Massachusetts Association of Realtors	$235,000.00
Citizens Housing and Planning Association	$100,000.00
Massachusetts Association of Community Development Corporations	$61,000
National Apartment Association	$50,000
Greater Boston Real Estate Board	$47,250
Home Builders Association of Massachusetts	$25,000

Arguments

repealing the affordable housing law would immediately halt the creation of housing that is affordable to seniors and working families in many communities across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/9/2012. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.