Bimetallism

In economics, bimetallism is a monetary standard in which the value of the monetary unit is defined as equivalent both[1] to a certain quantity of gold and to a certain quantity of silver; such a system establishes a fixed rate of exchange between the two metals. The defining characteristics of bimetallism are:[2]

The combination of these conditions distinguishes bimetallism from a limping standard, where both gold and silver are legal tender but only one is freely coined (example: France, Germany, or the United States after 1873), or trade money where both metals are freely coined but only one is legal tender and the other is trade money (example: most of the coinage of western Europe from the 13th to 18th centuries.) Economists also distinguish legal bimetallism, where the law guarantees these conditions, and de facto bimetallism where both gold and silver coins actually circulate at a fixed rate.

Bimetallism was intended to increase the supply of money, stabilize prices, and facilitate setting exchange rates.[3] Some authors, such as Angela Redish[4] or Charles Kindleberger[5] have argued that bimetallism was, by construction, unstable. Changes in gold-silver exchange were, in their eyes, leading to massive changes in the money supply. Bimetallism was thus inherently flawed, and the advent of the gold standard was inevitable. This view has been challenged by Friedman[6] and Flandreau[7] who wrote that the option to pay in gold or in silver had in fact a stabilizing effect.

Argentina

In 1881, a currency reform in Argentina introduced a bimetallic standard, which went into effect in July 1883.[8] Units of gold and silver pesos would exchange with paper peso notes at given par values, and fixed exchange rates against key international currencies would thus be established.[8] Unlike many metallic standards the system was very decentralized: no national monetary authority existed and all control over convertibility rested with the five banks of issue.[8] The period of convertibility lasted only 17 months: from December 1884 the banks of issue refused to exchange gold at par for notes.[8] The suspension of convertibility was soon accommodated by the Argentine government, since, having no institutional power over the monetary system, there was little they could do to prevent it.[8]

France

An 1803 French law, granted anyone who brought gold or silver to its mint the right to have it coined at a nominal charge over the official rate of 5 grams of 0.9 silver per franc or 3100 francs per kilogram of 0.9 fine gold.[9] This effectively established a bimetallic standard at the rate which had been used for French coinage since 1785, i.e. a relative valuation of gold to silver of 15.5 to 1. This rate was still close to the market rate in 1803, but for most of the next half century the market rate was above 15.5 to 1.[9] As a consequence, silver powered the French economy and gold was exported. Then the Forty-Niners went to California and found enough gold to make it a less precious metal. Now the market rate fell below 15.5 to 1 and stayed there until 1866. Frenchmen responded by exporting silver to India and importing nearly two-fifths of the world’s production of gold in the period from 1848 to 1870.[10] Napoleon III introduced five franc gold coins which provided a substitute for the silver five franc coins which were hoarded[11] but still maintained the formal bimetalism implicit in the 1803 law.

Latin Monetary Union

The national coinages introduced in Belgium (1832), Switzerland (1850), and Italy (1861) were based on France’s bimetallic currency. These countries joined France in a treaty signed on 23 December 1865 which established the Latin Monetary Union(LMU).[10] Greece joined the LMU in 1868 and about twenty other countries adhered to its standards.[12] The LMU effectively adopted bimetallism by allowing unlimited free coinage of gold and silver at the 15.5 to 1 rate used in France, but also began to back away from bimetallism by allowing limited issues of low denomination silver coins struck to a lower standard for government accounts.[13] A surplus of silver led the LMU to limit free coinage of silver in 1874 and to end it in 1878, effectively abandoning bimetallism for the gold standard.[13]

United Kingdom

Medieval and early modern England used bimetallism to provide the necessary range of coin denomination; but silver coinage began to be restricted in the 18th C, first informally, and then by an Act of 1774[14] After the suspension of metal convertibility from 1797-1819, Peel's Bill set the country on the gold standard for the remainder of the century. However advocates of a return to bimetallism did not cease to appear. After the crash of 1825, William Huskisson argued strongly within the Government for bimetallism, as a way to increase credit (as well as to ease trade with South America).[15] Similarly, after the banking crisis of 1847, Alexander Baring headed an external bimetallist movement hoping to prevent the undue restriction of the currency.[16] It was, however, only in the last quarter of the century that the movement for bimetallism gathered real strength, drawing on Manchester cotton merchants and City financiers with Far East interests to offer a serious (if ultimately unsuccessful) challenge to the gold standard.[17]

United States

In 1787, the United States Constitution established gold and silver as the legal tender of the United States[18] at a floating exchange rate. Then in 1792, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton proposed fixing the silver to gold exchange rate at 15:1, as well as establishing the mint for the public services of free coinage and currency regulation "in order not to abridge the quantity of circulating medium.".[19] With its acceptance, Sec.11 of the Coinage Act of 1792 established: "That the proportional value of gold to silver in all coins which shall by law be current as money within the United States, shall be as fifteen to one, according to quantity in weight, of pure gold or pure silver;" the proportion had slipped by 1834 to sixteen to one. Bimetallism was effectively abandoned by the Coinage Act of 1873, but not formally outlawed as legal currency until the early 20th century. The merits of the system were the subject of debate in the late 19th century. If the market forces of supply and demand for either metal caused its bullion value to exceed its nominal currency value, it tends to disappear from circulation by hoarding or melting down.

Political debate

In the United States, bimetallism became a center of political conflict toward the end of the 19th century. During the Civil War, to finance the war the U.S. switched from bimetallism to a fiat money currency. After the war, in 1873, the government passed the Fourth Coinage Act and soon resumption of specie payments began (without the free and unlimited coinage of silver, thus putting the U.S. on a mono-metallic gold standard.) Farmers, debtors, Westerners and others who felt they had benefited from wartime paper money formed the short-lived Greenback Party to press for cheap paper money backed by silver.[20] The latter element - "free silver" - came increasingly to the fore as the answer to the same interest groups' concerns, and was taken up as a central plank by the Populist movement.[21] Proponents of monetary silver, known as the silverites, referred back to the Fourth Coinage Act as "The Crime of '73," as it was judged to have inhibited inflation, and favoured creditors over debtors. Some reformers, however, like Henry Demarest Lloyd, saw bimetallism as a red herring and feared that free silver was "the cowbird of the reform movement, likely to push the other eggs out of the nest.[22] Nevertheless the Panic of 1893, a severe nationwide depression, brought the money issue strongly to the fore again. The "silverites" argued that using silver would inflate the money supply and mean more cash for everyone, which they equated with prosperity. The gold advocates said silver would permanently depress the economy, but that sound money produced by a gold standard would restore prosperity.

1896 Republican poster warns against free silver.

Bimetallism and "Free Silver" were demanded by William Jennings Bryan who took over leadership of the Democratic Party in 1896, as well as by the Populists, and a faction of Republicans from silver mining regions in the West known as the Silver Republicans who also endorsed Bryan.[23] The Republican Party itself nominated William McKinley on a platform supporting the gold standard which was favored by financial interests on the East Coast.

Bryan, the eloquent champion of the cause, gave the famous "Cross of Gold" speech at the National Democratic Convention on July 9, 1896 asserting that "The gold standard has slain tens of thousands." He referred to "a struggle between 'the idle holders of idle capital’ and 'the struggling masses, who produce the wealth and pay the taxes of the country;’ and, my friends, the question we are to decide is: Upon which side will the Democratic party fight?" At the peroration, he said "You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold." [24] However, his presidential campaign was ultimately unsuccessful; this can be partially attributed to the discovery of the cyanide process by which gold could be extracted from low grade ore. This process and the discoveries of large gold deposits in South Africa (Witwatersrand Gold Rush of 1887 - with large-scale production starting in 1898) and the Klondike Gold Rush (1896) increased the world gold supply and the subsequent increase in money supply that free coinage of silver was supposed to bring. The McKinley campaign was effective at persuading voters in the business East that poor economic progress and unemployment would be exacerbated by adoption of the Bryan platform.[25] 1896 saw the election of McKinley. The direct link to gold was abandoned in 1934 in FDR’s New Deal program and later the link was broken by Nixon when he closed the gold window.

Economic analysis

In 1992, economist Milton Friedman concluded that abandonment of the bimetallic standard in 1873 led to greater price instability than would have occurred otherwise, and thus resulted in long-term harm to the US economy. His retrospective analysis led him to write that the act of 1873 "... was a mistake that had highly adverse consequences."[26]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Bimetallism in the United States.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Oxford English Dictionary, bimetallism, "The system of allowing the unrestricted currency of two metals (e.g. gold and silver) at a fixed ratio to each other, as coined money."
  2. ↑ Velde and Webber, A Model of Bimetallism, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department
  3. ↑ Encyclopedia Britannica, Bimetallism
  4. ↑ Redish, Angela, 1995, “The persistence of bimetallism in nineteenth century France”. Economic History Review, 717–736
  5. ↑ Kindleberger, Charles, 1984, A financial history of Western Europe, London: Allen and Unwin.
  6. ↑ Friedman, Milton, 1990, “Bimetallism Revisited”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, 4(4), 85–104.
  7. ↑ Flandreau, Marc, 1996, “The French Crime of 1873: An Essay on the Emergence of the International Gold Standard, 1870–1880”, The Journal of Economic History, 56(4), 862–897.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 della Paolera, Gerardo; Taylor, Alan M. (2001). "The Argentine Currency Board and the Search for Macroeconomic Stability, 1880–1935" (PDF). University of Chicago Press. pp. 46–48. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-12-30.
  9. 1 2 Dickson Leavens, Silver Money, Chapter IV Bimetallism in France and the Latin Monetary Union, page 25
  10. 1 2 Dickson Leavens, op. cit. page 26
  11. ↑ John Porteous, Coins in History, page 238
  12. ↑ Robert Friedberg, Gold Coins of the World, fourth edition, page 11
  13. 1 2 John Porteous, op. cit. page 241
  14. ↑ A. Redish, Bimetallism (2006) p. 67 and p. 205
  15. ↑ B. Hilton, A Mad, Bad & Dangerous People? (Oxford 2008) p. 303
  16. ↑ E. Halevy, Victorian Years (GB 1961) p. 201
  17. ↑ P. J. Cain, British Imperialism (2016) p. 155-6 and p. 695
  18. ↑ U.S. Constitution
  19. ↑ 2 Annals of Cong. 2115 (1789–1791), cited in Arthur Nussbaum, The Law of the Dollar, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 7 (Nov., 1937), pp. 1057–1091
  20. ↑ R. B. Nye, the Growth of the United States (Penguin 1955) p. 599-603
  21. ↑ H. G, Nicholas, The American Union (Penguin 1950) p. 220
  22. ↑ Quoted in R. B. Nye, the Growth of the United States (Penguin 1955) p. 603
  23. ↑ R. B. Nye, the Growth of the United States (Penguin 1955) p. 603
  24. ↑ R. B. Nye, the Growth of the United States (Penguin 1955) p. 604
  25. ↑ H. G, Nicholas, The American Union (Penguin 1950) p. 222
  26. ↑ Milton Friedman, Money Mischief (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992) 78.

Primary sources

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/2/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.