Combined injectable contraceptive

Combined Injectable Contraceptive
Background
Type Hormonal
First use about 1980
Failure rates (first year)
Perfect use 0-0.2%[1]
Typical use ?
Usage
Duration effect 1 month
User reminders ?
Advantages and disadvantages
STD protection No
Benefits Especially good if poor pill compliance.

Combined injectable contraceptive (CIC) monthly injection of a progestin and an estrogen taken to suppress fertility. Brand names include Cyclofem, Novafem, Mesigyna, Lunelle and Cyclo-Provera.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a different injectable contraceptive, containing just a progestin, given every three months. It is a progestogen-only injectable contraceptive.

Hormonal contraception works primarily by preventing ovulation, but it may also thicken the cervical mucus inhibiting sperm penetration.[2][3][4] Hormonal contraceptives also have effects on the endometrium,[5][6] that theoretically could affect implantation,[7][8][9][10]

List of CICs

CICs that have been marketed include the following:[11][12][13]

Medical uses

CIC is administered by intramuscular injection into the deltoid, gluteus maximus, or anterior thigh.[1] It is ideally administered every 28 to 30 days, though it has been demonstrated to be effective up to 33 days.[1]

Side-effects

The most prominent side effects are menstrual irregularities during the first 3 to 6 months of use.[1]

History

See also

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "FDA Approves Combined Monthly Injectable Contraceptive". Contraception Report. 12 (3). 2001. Archived from the original on September 26, 2006.
  2. Tamara Callahan MD , Aaron Caughey MD , Blueprints Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013
  3. KD Tripathi , Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, 2013
  4. Dc Dutta's Textbook of Obstetrics, 2014
  5. K. A. Petrie, A. H. Torgal, C. L. Westhoff, Matched-pairs analysis of ovarian suppressionduring oral vs. vaginal hormonal contraceptive use, „Contraception” 2011, t. 84, p. e2-3
  6. R. L. Birtch, O. A. Olatunbosum, R. A. Pierson, Ovarian follicular dynamics during conventional vs continuous oral contraceptive use, „Contraception” 2006, t. 73, p. 235. p. 239.
  7. K. Bugge, K. S. Richter, J. Bromer, et al., Pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization are reduced with a thin endometrium, but are unrelated to endometrial thickness above 10 millimeters,„Fertility and Sterility” 2004, t. 82, p. S199.
  8. T. Fiumino, A. Kuwata, A. Teranischi et al., Significance of endometrium thickness to evaluate endometrial receptivity for embryos in natural cycle, „Fertility and Sterility” 2008, t. 90,p. S159.
  9. K. S. Richter, K. R. Bugge, J. G. Bromer, Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1. 294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos, „Fertility and Sterility” 2007, t. 87, p. 53.
  10. Rivera R, Yacobson I, Grimes D (1999). "The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 181 (5 Pt 1): 1263–9. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70120-1. PMID 10561657.
  11. Newton JR, D'arcangues C, Hall PE (1994). "A review of "once-a-month" combined injectable contraceptives". J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 4 Suppl 1: S1–34. doi:10.3109/01443619409027641. PMID 12290848.
  12. http://www.wjpps.com/download/article/1412071798.pdf
  13. Rowlands, S (2009). "New technologies in contraception". BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 116 (2): 230–239. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01985.x. ISSN 1470-0328.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/15/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.