Gta’ language

Gataq
Gta
Region India
Ethnicity 7,400 (2001 census)[1]
Native speakers
 (3,100 cited 1991 census)[1]
Language codes
ISO 639-3 gaq
Glottolog gata1239[2]

The Gta’ language (also rendered Gataʔ, Gataq, Getaq, Getaʔ, Gtaʔ, Gata and also known as Gta Asa, Didei/Didayi [ɖiɖaːj(i)], Dire) is a language spoken by the Didayi people of India. It is notable for its sesquisyllabic phonology (Anderson 2008:684-5) and vigesimal numeral system.

Demographics

Gta’ is spoken by 3,000 people primarily in Malkangiri district, Odisha as well as adjoining areas of Koraput district (Anderson 2008:682).

Ethnologue reports the following locations.

Dialects

Gta’ has two main varieties, namely Plains Gta’ and Hill Gta’.

Classification

The Gta’ language belongs to the South Munda subgroup of the Munda branch of the Austroasiatic language family.[1] Within South Munda, Gta’ is generally considered to be the first branch off a node that also subsumes the Remo and Gutob languages; this subgroup of South Munda is known as Gutob–Remo–Gataq. It is phonologically and morphologically divergent within that branch (Zide 1976).

Grammar

Nouns

Nouns in Gta? ordinarily have two forms, one a free full form, the other a bound short form. These latter occur only when the noun is compounded with some other stem for derivational 9 purposes, and are hence labeled "combining forms". Combining forms occurring with verb stems can be echoed independently of the verb stems; those occur? ring with noun stems either remain intact or change at par with the main stems.
Examples
Type 1: sur-cu to fry in oil > sur-ca, sur-ci, sar-ca, s?r-cf, sar-cu.
gag-bo? to tie onto the head
gag-ba?, gig-bT?, gag-bT?, gTg-ba?, gig-bo?.
"tur-t?a to graze cattle >
tar-ti, t?r-ti, tar-t?a, t?r-t?a.

Type 2: kula-re kinsman >
ka I a-re, k?I i-re.
sari-ja paddy flower >
sara-ja, s?ri-j?, si ri-ja.
ra-ko peacock feather >
bara-ka, bir?-k?, bir?-ko.
ult-so mango wood >
ala-sa, ?l?-sf, ala-so, Mi-so.
huQ-be baby bear >
har?-ba, h?tj-b?, harj-be, h?n-be.[3]

Echo Formation

Rules of Formation
Rule# 1. Echo-words are formed by changing only the vowels of the base word.

Rule# 2. The echo-word must differ from the base word. The vowel of univocalic base words is reflected as either /a/ or /}/ in the echo-word. For base-word /u, e, o/ the vowel /a/ is preferred, while for base word /e/ the vowel /I/ is preferred.

Rule# 3. The vowels of disyllabic base words are reflected in the echo-word as follows:

Rule# 4. In the case of trisyllabic base words, one, two or all three of the vowels (in adjacent syllables) are reflected as either /a/ or /}/.

Rule# 5. The echo-forms of compound words, irrespective of their vocalic structure, are derived as follows:

Categories of Echo Forms

  1. A-forms, indicating gross variety;
  2. I-forms, indicating diminutive or tender variety ;
  3. U/a-forms, indicating variety different from a related category
  4. Partially changed forms, indicating inferior variety : a-forms, indicating grossness and ?-forms, indicating tenderness.[5]

Numeral System

Gta' numeral system is vigesimal.

Gta' Numeral system
1. muiŋ 21. mũikuɽi muiŋ /ekustɔra
2. mbar 22. mũikuɽi mbar
3. ɲji 23. mũikuɽi ɲji
4. õ 24. mũikuɽi hõ
5. malʷe 25. mũikuɽi malikliɡˀ
6. tur 26. mũikuɽi turukliɡˀ
7. ɡul 27. mũikuɽi gukliɡˀ
8. tma /aʈʈa 28. mũikuɽi tomakliɡˀ / mũikuɽi tma
9. sontiŋ /nɔʈa 29. mũikuɽi sontiŋkliɡˀ
10. ɡʷa / dɔsʈa 30. mũikuɽi ɡʷa ( 20 + 10) / tirisʈa
11. ɡʷamiŋ / eɡaʈa 40. mbarkuɽi ( 2 x 20)/ calistɔra
12. ɡombar /baroʈa 50. mbarkuɽi ɡʷa ( 20 + 10) /pɔcas
13. ɡoɲji /teroʈa 60. ɲjikuɽi ( 3 x 20) / saʈe
14. ɡohõ /coudoʈa 70. ɲjikuɽi ɡʷa / suturi
15. ɡomal / pɔndrɔʈa 80. ōkuɽi ( 4 x 20)
16. ɡotur / soloːʈa 90. ōkuɽi ɡʷa
17. ɡogu / sɔtroʈa 100. malkuɽi ( 5 x 20) /soetɔra
18. ɡotma / aʈɾa
19. ɡososiŋ / unisʈa
20. ɡosolɡa /kuɽitɔra /kuɽeta

[6]

Neighboring Languages

Gta? echo-formation shows some striking similarities with echo-formation in neighboring Hunda languages such as Remo and Gorum as well as in the Desia dialect of Oriya spoken in the Koraput Munda region.The most conspicuous feature they have in common with Gta? is that echo-words in all three of these languages are also derived from base words by changes in the vowels alone.[7]

References

  1. 1 2 3 Gataq at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015)
  2. ↑ Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian, eds. (2016). "Gata'". Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
  3. ↑ Mahapatra, K. "Echo Formation in Gta?" (PDF).
  4. ↑ Mahapatra, K. "Echo Formation in Gta?" (PDF).
  5. ↑ Mahapatra, K. "Echo Formation in Gta?" (PDF).
  6. ↑ Dr.Arun Ghosh, "Gta' Numeral System"
  7. ↑ Mahapatra, K. "Echo Formation in Gta?" (PDF).

Ghosh, Arun. (n.d.). Numeral Systems of the World's Languages. http://lingweb.eva.mpg.de/numeral/

Further reading

  1. Anderson, G. (n.d.). Gtaʔ (Didey) Language - Munda Languages Project - Living Tongues Institute For Endangered Languages. from http://www.livingtongues.org/hotspots/hotspot.GSA.munda.Gta.html#GtaPayPal
  2. Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2001. A new classification of South Munda: Evidence from comparative verb morphology. Indian Linguistics 62.1: 21–36.
  3. Anderson, Gregory D.S. 2008. “Gtaʔ.” In: Gregory D.S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda Languages. London / New York. [Routledge Language Family Series]. 682-763.
  4. Bauer, C. (n.d.). Robert Parkin: A guide to Austroasiatic speakers and their languages. (Oceanic Linguistics, Special Publication, no. 23.) ix, 198, [xv] pp. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991. $21. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 193-193.
  5. DeArmond, R. (1976). Proto-Gutob-Remo-Gtaq Stressed Monosyllabic Vowels and Initial Consonants. Austroasiatic Studies Part I, 13, 213-227. Munda. (n.d.). Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://www.languagesgulper.com/eng/Munda.html
  6. Odden, D. (1987). Arguments against the Vowel Plane in Gta? Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 523-529.
  7. Parkin, R. (1988). Marriage, Behaviour and Generation among the Munda of Eastern India. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 113(1), 69-80.
  8. Sidwell, P., & Jenny, M. (2014). The Handbook of Austroasiatic Languages (2 vols). Leiden: BRILL.
  9. Stampe, D. (1965). Recent Work in Munda Linguistics I. International Journal of American Linguistics, 31(4), 332-341.
  10. Zide, N. (1976) "A Note on Gta? Echo Forms," in P. Jenner, L. Thompson, and S. Starosta, eds., Austroasiatic Stud- ies, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 4/19/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.