Hitomi (satellite)

Hitomi (ひとみ)

Artist depiction of Hitomi
Names ASTRO-H
New X-ray Telescope
Mission type X-ray astronomy
Operator JAXA
COSPAR ID 2016-012A
SATCAT № 41337
Mission duration Planned: 3 years
Final: ≈37 days and 16 hours
Spacecraft properties
Launch mass 2,700 kg (6,000 lb)[1]
Dimensions Length: 14 m (46 ft)[1]
Power 3,500 watts[1]
Start of mission
Launch date 17 February 2016, 08:45 (2016-02-17UTC08:45) UTC[2]
Rocket H-IIA 202, No. 30[2]
Launch site Tanegashima Space Center, Japan[2]
End of mission
Disposal Destroyed
Destroyed 26 March 2016 (2016-03-27), ≈01:42 UTC[3]
Orbital parameters
Reference system Geocentric
Regime Low Earth
Semi-major axis 6,948.6 km (4,317.7 mi)
Eccentricity 0.0015
Perigee 559.85 km (347.87 mi)
Apogee 581.10 km (361.08 mi)
Inclination 31.01°
Period 96 min
RAAN 67.28°
Argument of perigee 291.82°
Mean anomaly 68.07°
Mean motion 14.99 rev/day
Epoch 27 March 2016, 17:27:54 UTC[4]

Hitomi (Japanese: ひとみ), also known as ASTRO-H and New X-ray Telescope (NeXT), was an X-ray astronomy satellite commissioned by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) for studying extremely energetic processes in the Universe. The space observatory was designed to extend the research conducted by the Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics (ASCA) by investigating the hard X-ray band above 10 keV. The satellite was originally called New X-ray Telescope;[5] at the time of launch it was called ASTRO-H.[6] After it was placed in orbit and its solar panels deployed, it was renamed Hitomi.[7] The new name refers to the pupil of an eye, and to a legend of a painting of four dragons, two of which were given eyes and flew into the sky, and two that were left eyeless and stayed as motionless art.[6] The spacecraft was launched on 17 February 2016 and contact was lost on 26 March 2016, due to multiple incidents with the attitude control system leading to an uncontrolled spin rate and breakup of structurally weak elements.[8]

Objectives

Hitomi's objectives were to explore the large-scale structure and evolution of the universe, as well as the distribution of dark matter within galaxy clusters[9] and how the galaxy clusters evolve over time;[6] how matter behaves in strong gravitational fields[9] (such as matter inspiraling into black holes[6]), to explore the physical conditions in regions where cosmic rays are accelerated,[9] as well as observing supernovae.[6] In order to achieve this, it was designed to be capable of:[9]

  1. Imaging and spectroscopic measurements with a hard X-ray telescope;[9]
  2. Spectroscopic observations with an extremely high energy resolution using the micro-calorimeter;[9]
  3. Sensitive wideband observations over the energy range 0.3-600 keV.[9]

It was the sixth of a series of JAXA X-ray satellites,[9] which started in 1979,[7] and it was designed to observe sources that are an order of magnitude fainter than its predecessor, Suzaku.[6] Its planned mission length was three years.[7] At the time of launch, two other large X-ray satellites were carrying out observations in orbit: the Chandra X-ray Observatory and XMM-Newton, both of which were launched in 1999.[6]

Instruments

The probe carried four instruments and six detectors to observe photons with energies ranging from soft X-rays to gamma rays, with a high energy resolution.[9][7] Hitomi was built by an international collaboration led by JAXA with over 70 contributing institutions in Japan, the US, Canada, and Europe,[9] and over 160 scientists.[10] With a mass of 2.7 tonnes (2,700 kg),[9][7] At launch, Hitomi was the heaviest Japanese X-ray mission.[1] The satellite is about 14 m (46 ft) in length.[7]

Two soft X-ray telescopes (SXT-S, SXT-I), with focal lengths of 5.6 m (18 ft), focus light onto a soft X-ray Spectrometer (SXS),[9] provided by NASA,[11] with an energy range of 0.4-12 keV for high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy, and a soft X-ray imager (SXI),[9] with an energy range of 0.3-12 keV.

Two hard X-ray telescopes (HXT), with a focus length of 12 m (39 ft),[9][12] focus light onto two hard X-ray imagers (HXI),[9] with energy range 5-80 keV,[12] which are mounted on a plate placed at the end of the 6 m (20 ft) extendable optical bench (EOB) that is deployed once the satellite is in orbit.[9] The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) provided the Canadian ASTRO-H Metrology System (CAMS),[13][14] which is a laser alignment system that will be used to measure the distortions in the extendible optical bench.

Two soft Gamma-ray detectors (SGD), each containing three units, were mounted on two sides of the satellite, using non-focusing detectors to observe soft gamma-ray emission with energies from 60 to 600 KeV.[1][9]

The Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON) in collaboration with the University of Geneva provided the filter-wheel and calibration source for the spectrometer.[15][16]

Launch

The launch of the satellite was planned for 2013 as of 2008,[11] later revised to 2015 as of 2013.[10] As of early February 2016, it was planned for 12 February, but was delayed due to poor weather forecasts.[17]

Hitomi launched on 17 February 2016 at 08:45 UTC[6][7] into a low Earth orbit of approximately 575 km (357 mi).[9] The circular orbit had a period of around 96 minutes, and an inclination of 31 degrees.[9] It was launched from the Tanegashima Space Center on board an H-IIA rocket.[9][6] 14 minutes after launch, the satellite separated from the rocket. The solar arrays later deployed according to plan, and it began its on-orbit checkout.[6]

Loss of spacecraft

On 27 March 2016, JAXA reported that communication with Hitomi had "failed from the start of its operation" on 26 March at 07:40 UTC.[18] On the same day, the U.S. Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) announced on Twitter that it had observed a breakup of the satellite into 5 pieces at 08:20 UTC on 26 March 2016,[19] and its orbit also suddenly changed on the same day.[20] Later analysis by the JSpOC found that the fragmentation likely took place around 01:42 UTC, but that there was no evidence the spacecraft had been struck by debris.[3] Between 26 and 28 March, JAXA reported receiving three brief signals from Hitomi; while the signals were offset by 200 kHz from what was expected from Hitomi, their direction of origin and time of reception suggested they were legitimate.[21] Later analysis, however, determined that the signals were not from Hitomi but from an unknown radio source not registered with the International Telecommunication Union.[21][22]

JAXA stated they were working to recover communication and control over the spacecraft,[18] but that "the recovery will require months, not days."[23] Initially suggested possibilities for the communication loss is that a helium gas leak, battery explosion, or stuck-open thruster caused the satellite to start rotating, rather than a catastrophic failure.[20][24][25] JAXA announced on 1 April that Hitomi had lost attitude control at around 19:10 UTC on 25 March. After analysing engineering data from just before the communication loss, however, no problems were noted with either the helium tank or batteries.[26]

The same day, JSpOC released orbital data for ten detected pieces of debris, five more than originally reported, including one piece that was large enough to initially be confused with the main body of the spacecraft.[27][28] Amateur trackers observed what was believed to be Hitomi tumbling in orbit, with reports of the main spacecraft body (Object A) rotating once every 1.3 or 2.6 seconds, and the next largest piece (Object L) rotating every 10 seconds.[28]

JAXA ceased efforts to recover the satellite on 28 April 2016, switching focus to anomaly investigation.[22][29] It was determined that the chain of events that led to the spacecraft's loss began with its inertial reference unit (IRU) reporting a rotation of 21.7 degrees per hour at 19:10 UTC on 25 March, though the vehicle was actually stable. The attitude control system attempted to use Hitomi's reaction wheels to counteract the non-existent spin, which caused the spacecraft to rotate in the opposite direction. Because the IRU continued to report faulty data, the reaction wheels began to accumulate excessive momentum, tripping the spacecraft's computer into taking the vehicle into "safe hold" mode. Attitude control then tried to use its thrusters to stabilise the spacecraft; the sun sensor was unable to lock on to the Sun's position, and continued thruster firings caused Hitomi to rotate even faster due to an incorrect software setting. Because of this excessive rotation rate, early on 26 March several parts of the spacecraft broke away, likely including both solar arrays and the extended optical bench.[8][21]

Prospects of a replacement mission

Reports of a Hitomi replacement mission first surfaced on 21 June 2016.[30] According to an article from Kyodo News, JAXA was considering a launch of "Hitomi 2" in the early 2020s aboard Japan's new H3 launch vehicle.[30] The spacecraft would be a near-copy of Hitomi.[30] However, a 27 June article from The Nikkei stated that some within the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology believed it was too early to grant funding for a Hitomi replacement.[31] The article also noted that NASA had expressed support for a replacement mission led by Japan.

On 14 July 2016, JAXA published a press release regarding the ongoing study of a successor.[32] According to the press release, the spacecraft would be a remanufacture but with countermeasures reflecting Hitomi's loss, and would be launched in 2020 on a H-IIA rocket. The scientific mission of the "ASTRO-H Successor" would be based around the SXS instrument.[32] The Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Hiroshi Hase, stated during a press conference on 15 July that funding for Hitomi's successor will be allocated in the fiscal year 2017 budget request,[33] and that he intends to accept the successor mission on the condition that the investigation of Hitomi's destruction is completed and measures to prevent recurrence are done accordingly.[34]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Insight into the Hot Universe: X-ray Astronomy Satellite ASTRO-H" (PDF). JAXA. November 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 Graham, William (17 February 2016). "Japanese H-IIA rocket launches ASTRO-H mission". NASA Spaceflight. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  3. 1 2 Gruss, Mike (29 March 2016). "U.S. Air Force: No evidence malfunctioning Japanese satellite was hit by debris". Space News. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  4. "ASTRO H - Orbit". Heavens Above. 27 March 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  5. "Hitomi (ASTRO-H)". NASA. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wall, Mike (17 February 2016). "Japan Launches X-Ray Observatory to Study Black Holes, Star Explosions". Space.com. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Successful launch of Hitomi". University of Cambridge. 17 February 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  8. 1 2 Clark, Stephen (18 April 2016). "Attitude control failures led to break-up of Japanese astronomy satellite". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 "Astro-H - Overview". JAXA. 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  10. 1 2 "The ASTRO-H X-ray observatory" (PDF). JAXA. March 2013. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  11. 1 2 "NASA Selects Explorer Mission of Opportunity Investigations". NASA. 20 June 2008. Archived from the original on 26 June 2008. Retrieved 23 June 2008.
  12. 1 2 "ASTRO-H - Hard X-ray Imaging System". JAXA. 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  13. "The Canadian ASTRO-H Metrology System". Saint Mary's University.
  14. "Canada Partners on Japanese X-ray Space Observatory". Canadian Space Agency.
  15. "SRON - ASTRO-H". Netherlands Institute for Space Research. 2010. Retrieved 31 March 2010.
  16. "European Science Support Centre for Hitomi". University of Geneva. Retrieved 31 March 2010.
  17. "Launch of Japanese X-ray observatory postponed". Spaceflight Now. 11 February 2016.
  18. 1 2 "Communication failure of X-ray Astronomy Satellite "Hitomi" (ASTRO-H)". JAXA. 27 March 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  19. "JSpOC ID'd 2 breakups...". Twitter.com. Joint Space Operations Center. 27 March 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  20. 1 2 Drake, Nadia (27 March 2016). "Japan Loses Contact With Newest Space Telescope". National Geographic. No Place Like Home. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  21. 1 2 3 "Supplemental Handout on the Operation Plan of the X-ray Astronomy Satellite ASTRO-H (Hitomi)" (PDF). JAXA. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 13 June 2016.
  22. 1 2 "Japan abandons costly X-ray satellite lost in space". Associated Press. 29 April 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2016.
  23. Foust, Jeff (30 March 2016). "JAXA believes still possible to recover Hitomi". Space News. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  24. "Japan: Trouble Reaching Innovative New Space Satellite". ABC News. The Associated Press. 27 March 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
  25. Misra, Ria; Ouellette, Jennifer (30 March 2016). "Japan's Lost Black Hole Satellite Just Reappeared and Nobody Knows What Happened to It". Gizmodo. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  26. "Debris appeared after Hitomi failed to keep position, JAXA says". The Japan Times. Jiji Press. 2 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  27. "10 pieces from Astro-H break-up...". Twitter.com. Joint Space Operations Center. 1 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  28. 1 2 "New Orbital Data & Observations Dim Hopes for Japanese Hitomi Spacecraft". Spaceflight101. 2 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  29. "Operation Plan of X-ray Astronomy Satellite ASTRO-H (Hitomi)". NASA. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  30. 1 2 3 "衛星「ひとみ2」打ち上げへ 20年代前半目標に再挑戦" (in Japanese). Kyodo News. 22 June 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  31. "JAXA、「ひとみ」代替機の検討浮上 文科省は慎重". The Nikkei (in Japanese). 27 June 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  32. 1 2 "X線天文衛星ASTRO‐H「ひとみ」の後継機の検討について" (PDF) (in Japanese). JAXA. 14 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  33. "衛星「ひとみ」後継機、17年度に開発着手を 文科相". The Nikkei (in Japanese). 15 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  34. "「ひとみ」後継機を容認=概算要求盛り込む-馳文科相" (in Japanese). Jiji Press. 15 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to ASTRO-H.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/5/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.