United States House of Representatives elections, 1908
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elections to the United States House of Representatives in 1908 were held for members of the 61st Congress, coinciding with the 1908 presidential election, which William Howard Taft won.
Taft was not as popular as his predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt, but won with Roosevelt's backing, and his Republican Party lost only a handful of seats to the opposition Democrats. Without any striking national issues, the Republicans were able to remain in control. Regional issues led to some changes in House membership, but new Democrats who were elected by dissatisfied industrial workers were balanced out by new Republicans who gained seats in districts with a strong middle class presence.
Election summaries
219 | 172 |
Republican | Democratic |
State | Type | Total seats |
Republican | Democratic | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seats | Change | Seats | Change | |||
Alabama | District | 9 | 0 | 9 | ||
Arkansas | District | 7 | 0 | 7 | ||
California | District | 8 | 8 | 0 | ||
Colorado | District +at-large |
3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Connecticut | District +at-large |
5 | 5 | 0 | ||
Delaware | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Florida | District | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
Georgia | District | 11 | 0 | 11 | ||
Idaho | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Illinois | District | 25 | 19 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
Indiana | District | 13 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 7 |
Iowa | District | 11 | 10 | 1 | ||
Kansas | District | 8 | 8 | 0 | ||
Kentucky | District | 11 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Louisiana | District | 7 | 0 | 7 | ||
Maine[Note 2] | District | 4 | 4 | 0 | ||
Maryland | District | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||
Massachusetts | District | 14 | 11 | 3 | ||
Michigan | District | 12 | 12 | 0 | ||
Minnesota | District | 9 | 8 | 1 | ||
Mississippi | District | 8 | 0 | 8 | ||
Missouri | District | 16 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
Montana | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Nebraska | District | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Nevada | At-large | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
New Hampshire | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
New Jersey | District | 10 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
New York | District | 37 | 26 | 11 | ||
North Carolina | District | 10 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
North Dakota | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
Ohio | District | 21 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 3 |
Oklahoma | District | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Oregon[Note 2] | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
Pennsylvania | District | 32 | 27 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
Rhode Island | District | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
South Carolina | District | 7 | 0 | 7 | ||
South Dakota | At-large | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
Tennessee | District | 10 | 2 | 8 | ||
Texas | District | 16 | 0 | 16 | ||
Utah | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Vermont[Note 2] | District | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||
Virginia | District | 10 | 1 | 9 | ||
Washington | District[Note 3] | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||
West Virginia | District | 5 | 5 | 0 | ||
Wisconsin | District | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Wyoming | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
Total | 391 | 219 56.0% |
5 | 172 44.0% |
5 |
[[Image:61 us house membership.png|thumb|left|350px|
]] |
[[Image:61 us house changes.png|thumb|left|350px|
]] |
Early election dates
In 1908, three states, with 8 seats among them, held elections early:
This was the last year that Oregon held its congressional elections early.
Complete returns
Party abbreviations
- D: Democratic
- IL: Independence League
- Pro: Prohibition
- R: Republican
- S: Socialist
California
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California 1 | William F. Englebright | Republican | 1906 | Re-elected | William F. Englebright (R) 54.1% E. W. Holland (D) 36.8% D. N. Cunningham (S) 7.6% W. P. Fassett (Pro) 1.4% |
California2 | Duncan E. McKinlay | Republican | 1904 | Re-elected | Duncan E. McKinlay (R) 57.5% W. K. Hays (D) 38.5% A. J. Gaylord (S) 4% |
California 3 | Joseph R. Knowland | Republican | 1904 | Re-elected | Joseph R. Knowland (R) 64.1% George W. Peckham (D) 22.8% O. H. Philbrick (S) 9.3% John A. Sands (IL) 2.1% T. H. Montgomery (Pro) 1.7% |
California 4 | Julius Kahn | Republican | 1898 | Re-elected | Julius Kahn (R) 52.7% James G. Maguire (D) 42.9% K. J. Doyle (S) 4% William N. Meserve (Pro) 0.3% |
California 5 | Everis A. Hayes | Republican | 1904 | Re-elected | Everis A. Hayes (R) 49.1% George A. Tracy (D) 42.8% E. H. Misner (S) 6.3% Walter E. Vail (Pro) 1.8% |
California 6 | James C. Needham | Republican | 1898 | Re-elected | James C. Needham (R) 52% Fred P. Feliz (D) 38.7% W. M. Pattison (S) 5.6% James W. Webb (Pro) 3.7% |
California 7 | James McLachlan | Republican | 1900 | Re-elected | James McLachlan (R) 91.5% Jud R. Rush (D) 6.3% A. R. Holston (S) 1.1% Marshall W. Atwood (Pro) 1% F. G. Hentig (IL) 0.2% |
California 8 | Sylvester C. Smith | Republican | 1904 | Re-elected | Sylvester C. Smith (R) 55.7% W. E. Shepherd (D) 34.7% Noble A. Richardson (S) 9.6% |
Florida
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Florida 1 | Stephen M. Sparkman | Democratic | 1894 | Re-elected | Stephen M. Sparkman (D) 75.2% George W. Allen (R) 15.0% C. C. Allen (S) 9.8% |
Florida 2 | Frank Clark | Democratic | 1904 | Re-elected | Frank Clark (D) 75.9% William R. O'Neal (R) 18.0% A. N. Jackson (S) 6.1% |
Florida 3 | William B. Lamar | Democratic | 1902 | Ran unsuccessfully for the Senate Democratic hold |
Dannite H. Mays (D) 84.5% William Northrup (R) 15.5% |
South Carolina
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
South Carolina 1 | George Swinton Legaré | Democratic | 1902 | Re-elected | George Swinton Legaré (D) 90.1% Aaron P. Prioleau (R) 9.9% |
South Carolina 2 | James O'H. Patterson | Democratic | 1904 | Re-elected | James O'H. Patterson (D) 99.3% Isaac Myers (R) 0.7% |
South Carolina 3 | Wyatt Aiken | Democratic | 1902 | Re-elected | Wyatt Aiken (D) 100% |
South Carolina 4 | Joseph T. Johnson | Democratic | 1900 | Re-elected | Joseph T. Johnson (D) 100% |
South Carolina 5 | David E. Finley | Democratic | 1898 | Re-elected | David E. Finley (D) 100% |
South Carolina 6 | J. Edwin Ellerbe | Democratic | 1904 | Re-elected | J. Edwin Ellerbe (D) 100% |
South Carolina 7 | Asbury F. Lever | Democratic | 1901 (special) | Re-elected | Asbury F. Lever (D) 90.9% AR. H. Richardson (R) 9.1% |
See also
Notes
References
- 1 2 "Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present". Office of the Historian, United States House of Representatives. Retrieved May 18, 2015.
- 1 2 Martis, pp. 162–163.
Bibliography
- Dubin, Michael J. (March 1, 1998). United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results of the Elections of the 1st Through 105th Congresses. McFarland and Company. ISBN 978-0786402830.
- Martis, Kenneth C. (January 1, 1989). The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress, 1789-1989. Macmillan Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0029201701.
- Moore, John L., ed. (1994). Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections (Third ed.). Congressional Quarterly Inc. ISBN 978-0871879967.
- "Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present". Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
External links
- Office of the Historian (Office of Art & Archives, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)