John Russell, 1st Earl Russell
The Right Honourable The Earl Russell KG GCMG PC FRS | |
---|---|
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom | |
In office 29 October 1865 – 28 June 1866 | |
Monarch | Victoria |
Preceded by | The Viscount Palmerston |
Succeeded by | The Earl of Derby |
In office 30 June 1846 – 23 February 1852 | |
Monarch | Victoria |
Preceded by | Sir Robert Peel, Bt |
Succeeded by | The Earl of Derby |
Leader of the Opposition | |
In office 28 June 1866 – 3 December 1868 | |
Monarch | Victoria |
Preceded by | The Earl of Derby |
Succeeded by | Benjamin Disraeli |
In office 23 February 1852 – 19 December 1852 | |
Monarch | Victoria |
Preceded by | The Earl of Derby |
Succeeded by | The Earl of Derby |
Foreign Secretary | |
In office 18 June 1859 – 3 November 1865 | |
Preceded by | The Earl of Malmesbury |
Succeeded by | The Earl of Clarendon |
In office 28 December 1852 – 21 February 1853 | |
Preceded by | The Earl of Malmesbury |
Succeeded by | The Earl of Clarendon |
Secretary of State for the Colonies | |
In office 23 February 1855 – 21 July 1855 | |
Preceded by | Sidney Herbert |
Succeeded by | Sir William Molesworth, Bt |
Lord President of the Council | |
In office 12 June 1854 – 8 February 1855 | |
Preceded by | The Earl Granville |
Succeeded by | The Earl Granville |
Secretary of State for War and the Colonies | |
In office 30 August 1839 – 30 August 1841 | |
Preceded by | The Marquess of Normanby |
Succeeded by | Lord Stanley |
Home Secretary | |
In office 18 April 1835 – 30 August 1839 | |
Preceded by | Henry Goulburn |
Succeeded by | The Marquess of Normanby |
Personal details | |
Born |
John Russell 18 August 1792 Mayfair, Middlesex, England |
Died |
28 May 1878 85) Richmond Park, Surrey, England | (aged
Political party | Liberal (1868–1878) |
Other political affiliations | Whig (until 1868) |
Spouse(s) |
|
Children | 4 |
Alma mater | University of Edinburgh |
Religion | Church of England |
Signature |
John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, KG, GCMG, PC, FRS (18 August 1792 – 28 May 1878), known as Lord John Russell before 1861, was a leading Whig and Liberal politician who served as Prime Minister on two occasions during the mid-19th century. Scion of one of the most powerful aristocratic families, his great achievements, says A. J. P. Taylor, were based on his indefatigable battles in Parliament over the years on behalf of the expansion of liberty; after each loss he tried again and again, until finally his efforts were largely successful. Woodward, however, argued that he was too much the abstract theorist, so that "He was more concerned with the removal of obstacles to civil liberty than with the creation of a more reasonable and civilised society.[1] Nevertheless Russell led his Whig Party into support for reform; he was the principal architect of the great Reform Act of 1832. As Prime Minister his luck ran out. He took much of the blame for the government's failures in dealing with the Irish famine. Taylor concludes that as prime minister, he was not a success. Indeed, his Government of 1846 to 1852 was the ruin of the Whig party: it never composed a Government again, and his Government of 1865 to 1866, which might be described as the first Liberal Government, was very nearly the ruin of the Liberal party also.[2]
Background and education
Russell was born small and premature into the highest echelons of the British aristocracy. The Russell family had been one of the principal Whig dynasties in England since the 17th century, and were among the richest handful of aristocratic landowning families in the country, but as a younger son of the 6th Duke of Bedford, he was not expected to inherit the family estates. As a younger son of a Duke, he bore the courtesy title "Lord John Russell," but he was not a peer in his own right. He was, therefore, able to sit in the House of Commons until he was made an earl in 1861, and transitioned into the House of Lords.
After being withdrawn from Westminster School due to ill health, Russell was educated by tutors. He attended the University of Edinburgh, 1809 and 1812; he did not take a degree. Although of small stature—he grew to no more than 5 feet 4-and-three-quarter inches tall[3]—and often in poor health, he traveled widely in Britain and on the continent,[4] and held commission as Captain in the Bedfordshire Militia in 1810.[3] During his continental travels, Russell had a 90 minute meeting with Napoleon in December 1814 during the former emperor's exile at Elba.[5]
Public life
Early career
Russell entered the House of Commons as a Whig in 1813. The future reformer gained his seat by virtue of his father, the Duke of Bedford, instructing the 30 or so electors of Tavistock to return him as an MP even though at the time Russell was abroad and under age.[6] In 1819, Russell embraced the cause of parliamentary reform, and led the more reformist wing of the Whigs throughout the 1820s. When the Whigs came to power in 1830 in Earl Grey's government, Russell entered the government as Paymaster of the Forces, and was soon elevated to the Cabinet. He was one of the principal leaders of the fight for the Reform Act 1832, earning the nickname Finality Jack from his complacency pronouncing the Act a final measure.[7] In 1834, when the leader of the Commons, Lord Althorp, succeeded to the peerage as Earl Spencer, Russell became the leader of the Whigs in the Commons. This appointment prompted King William IV to terminate Lord Melbourne's government, the last time in British history that a monarch dismissed a prime minister.[8] Nevertheless Russell retained his position for the rest of the decade, until the Whigs fell from power in 1841. In this position, Russell continued to lead the more reformist wing of the Whig party, calling, in particular, for religious freedom, and, as Home Secretary in the late 1830s, played a large role in democratising the government of British cities other than London. During his career in Parliament, Lord John Russell represented the City of London.[9]
Taylor emphasises Russell's central role in the expansion of liberty and in leading his Whig Party to a commitment to a reform agenda.[10] In 1845, as leader of the Opposition, Russell came out in favour of repeal of the Corn Laws, forcing Conservative Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel to follow him. In December 1845, with the Conservatives split over this issue, Queen Victoria asked Russell to form a government, which he was unable to do since Lord Grey refused to serve with Lord Palmerston as Foreign Secretary.[11] In June the following year the Corn Laws were repealed but only by virtue of Whig support. The same day Peel's Irish Coercion Bill, which the Whigs did not support, was defeated and the Prime Minister resigned.[12] Russell became Prime Minister, this time Grey not objecting to Palmerston's appointment.[13]
Prime Minister June 1846 – February 1852
Russell’s government introduced reforms such as the Ten Hours Act and measures to improve the training of teachers.[14] His premiership was frustrated, however, because of party disunity and infighting, and he was unable to secure the success of many of the measures he was interested in passing. Russell's first government coincided with the Great Irish Famine of the late 1840s. Russell was unable to find a solution. He fought with his headstrong Foreign Secretary, Lord Palmerston, whose belligerence and support for continental revolution he found embarrassing. In 1847 Palmerston provoked a confrontation with the French government by undermining the plans of the Spanish court to marry the young Spanish Queen and her sister into the French royal family.[15] He subsequently clashed with Russell over plans to augment the army and navy in order to defend against the perceived threat of French invasion, which subsided with the overthrow of the French king in 1848.[16]
In 1850 further tension arose between the two over Palmerston’s gunboat diplomacy in the Don Pacifico affair, in which Palmerston sought compensation from the Greek Government for the ransacking and burning of the house of Pacifico, a Gibraltarian holder of a British passport.[17] Russell considered the matter, “hardly worth the interposition of the British lion,” and when Palmerston ignored some of his instructions, the Prime Minister wrote to Palmerston telling him he had informed the Queen that he, “thought the interests of the country required that a change should take place at the Foreign Department.”[18] However less than a month later Lord Stanley successfully led the House of Lords into passing a motion of censure of the Government over its handling of the affair and Russell realised that he needed to align with Palmerston in order to prevent a similar motion being passed by the House of Commons, which would have obliged the Government to resign.[19] The Government prevailed but Palmerston came out of the affair with his popularity at new heights since he was seen as the champion of defending British citizens anywhere in the world.[20]
Palmerston was forced to resign when he recognised Napoleon III's coup of 2 December 1851, without royal approval. Russell tried to strengthen his government by recruiting leading Peelites such as Sir James Graham and the Duke of Newcastle to his administration but they declined.[21]
Palmerston turned the vote on a militia bill into a vote of confidence on the government. The majority vote in favour of an amendment proposed by Palmerston caused the downfall of Russell's ministry on 21 February 1852. This was Palmerston's famous "tit for tat with Johnny Russell," a revenge for his dismissal by Russell as Foreign Minister.[22]
In opposition February 1852 – December 1852
The July 1852 general election saw the election of 330 Conservatives and 324 Whigs to the Parliament. Neither had an overall majority for 38 members who were technically Conservatives, were actually Peelites (followers of the late Robert Peel). The Peelites had deserted the Conservatives to vote for the repeal of the Corn Laws in June 1846. The Corn Laws had imposed a tariff on all cheap imported wheat and, thus, kept the price of wheat and the bread made from wheat high. This served the interests of landed aristocracy, which was the main body of support for the Conservative Party. However, the high price of wheat and bread added greatly to the desperation of the poor and hungry in England and Ireland.[22]
The new Parliament included 113 "Free Traders" who were more radical than the Peelites. They felt that the tariffs on all imported consumer goods should be removed, not just the tariff on wheat or "corn." There were also 63 members of the "Irish Brigade," made up of Irish members interested in the Tenant Rights legislation for the protection of the tenant farmers in Ireland. None of these minor groups were interested in forming a government with the Conservatives because of the bitterness left over from the repeal of the Corn Laws. However, John Russell of the Whigs could not attract enough of the minor party members to form a government either. Other issues handled during the recent Russell government had alienated these three minor groups from the Whigs also. Thus, Queen Victoria asked the Earl of Derby to form a minority government. It only lasted until December 1852.[22]
Foreign Minister in the Aberdeen Government
Russell, as the leader of the Whig Party, then brought it into a new coalition government with the Peelite Conservatives, headed by the Peelite Lord Aberdeen. Palmerston could not possibly be appointed as Foreign Minister but he had to be a part of the new Aberdeen government and became Home Secretary. Russell continued to serve as Leader of the Whig Party in the House of Commons. As the leader of the largest party in the Aberdeen coalition government, Russell was needed in the new government. Accordingly, on 28 December 1852, Russell was appointed Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
In the eyes of many, including the Queen and Aberdeen, his jockeying for position against Palmerston was one of the causes of the inability of the administration to take a firm direction. It was a contest that Palmerston won. Having entered the administration as the expected Whig heir, Russell left it having been overtaken by Palmerston.[23]
The Crimean War
Together with Palmerston, Russell was instrumental in getting Britain to join France in thwarting the threat of Russia against the Ottoman Empire. They did so as members of the Aberdeen government and against the wishes of the cautious, Russophile Earl of Aberdeen. The Ottoman Empire was in a state of decline and several nations in Europe sought- to acquire portions of its territory. Russia sought to assert its territorial claims to the Balkans. However, just as soon as Louis Bonaparte had completed his coup against the Second Republic of France and assumed the title Napoleon III, he sent an ambassador to the Ottoman Empire with instructions to obtain from the Ottomans, a guarantee that France was to be the exclusive "protector of Christian sites" in Jerusalem and the Holy Land. Louis Bonaparte was the nephew of Napoleon I, Emperor of France, and many British public officials—like Aberdeen—felt that Louis Bonaparte was merely seeking foreign adventure and aggrandisement and would sooner or later involve Britain in another series of wars like those wars against France and Napoleon from 1793 to 1815. France had long been seen as an opponent of British interests, and that perception had not changed since 1815. Accordingly, much of the British public sided with Russia in what was now being called the "Eastern Question."[24] However, as time passed, the horrific losses of British soldiers, reported in detail in the press, caused British public opinion to turn hostile. The British government was worried about the outcome of the rising tensions over the Eastern Question. Accordingly, Aberdeen sent Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, a diplomat of considerable experience, to the Ottoman Empire, to oversee British interests.
When the Ottomans gave way to Louis Bonaparte's demands, Russia strongly objected and on 7 May 1853 one of Russia's leading statesmen, Prince Alexander Sergeyevich Menshikov, arrived in Turkey to demand an agreement favourable to Russia. During the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774, Russia had occupied the Turkish/Ottoman-controlled provinces of Wallachia and Moldavia (modern Romania). Under the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca signed in 1774, Russia had given these Danubian provinces back to the Ottoman Empire in exchange for Turkish recognition of Russia's exclusive right to "protect the Christian sites in Jerusalem and the Holy Land." Menshikov, using threats, obtained his agreement with The Porte.[25]
The British elite saw a growing Russian threat not just to the Ottomans but also to Europe and even India. The balance of power was being upset. London cooperated with Paris. France sent a French ship-of-the-line to the Black Sea, in the spring of 1852, as a show of force against the Russians. The Ottomans reversed themselves and signed a treaty acknowledging the French and the Vatican as the official protectors of the Christian sites in the Holy Land. The Russians responded by sending its 4th and 5th Army Corps into Wallachia and Moldavia. It expected Austria and Prussia would support this move, but they were opposed and Russia had no allies. The Aberdeen government resisted active pursuit of the war. Lord Russell, frustrated by the Prime Minister's delays, resigned from the government on 21 February 1853. Aberdeen replaced Russell with Lord Clarendon.[24]
The Ottoman Empire declared war on Russia on 23 October 1853. The Russian fleet defeated the Turkish fleet at the Battle of Sinope on 30 November 1853. After Russia had ignored the Anglo-French ultimatum, both France and Britain declared war on Russia on 28 March 1854. The war was fought chiefly in the Black Sea, with the great Russian base of Sebastopol in Crimea as the main target. In September 1854, British, French and Turkish troops landed on the Crimean Peninsula and set siege to Sevastopol. After a campaign marked by gross mismanagement and very high rates of death from disease, Sevastopol finally fell, but British public opinion had turned hostile.[26]
A motion in Parliament to investigate the mismanagement became a vote of confidence in the Aberdeen government and in the Secretary for War. Accordingly, when the Robuck motion passed, Aberdeen treated the vote as a vote of "no confidence" in his government and resigned. Upon the resignation of the Earl of Aberdeen, Lord Palmerston was asked to form a new government. John Russell was sent to Vienna to negotiate (accepting the Colonial Office) but sacrificed himself to protect negotiation confidentiality, and temporarily retired from politics in 1855, focusing on writing.[27]
Foreign Minister in the Palmerston Government 1859–1865
In 1859, following another short-lived Conservative government, Palmerston and Russell made up their differences, and Russell consented to serve as Foreign Secretary in a new Palmerston cabinet, usually considered the first true Liberal Cabinet. This period was a particularly eventful one in the world outside Britain, seeing the Unification of Italy, the American Civil War, and the 1864 war over Schleswig-Holstein between Denmark and the German states. Russell arranged the London Conference of 1864, but failed to establish peace in the war. His tenure of the Foreign Office was noteworthy for the famous dispatch in which he defended Italian independence: "Her Majesty's Government will turn their eyes rather to the gratifying prospect of a people building up the edifice of their liberties, and consolidating the work of their independence, amid the sympathies and good wishes of Europe" (27 October 1860).[28]
The House of Lords 1860
In 1861 Russell was elevated to the peerage as Earl Russell, of Kingston Russell in the County of Dorset, and as Viscount Amberley, of Amberley in the County of Gloucester, and of Ardsalla in the County of Meath. As a peer in his own right, he sat in the House of Lords for the remainder of his career.
Prime Minister again 1865–1866
When Palmerston suddenly died in late 1865, Russell again became Prime Minister. His second premiership was short and frustrating, and Russell failed in his great ambition of expanding the franchise, a task that would be left to his Conservative successors, Derby and Benjamin Disraeli. In 1866, party disunity again brought down his government. Russell never again held any office. His last contribution to the House of Lords was on 3 August 1875.[29]
Marriages and children
On 11 April 1835, Russell married Adelaide, Lady Ribblesdale, the eldest daughter of Thomas Lister Esq. and the widow of Thomas Lister, 2nd Baron Ribblesdale, who had died in 1832.[30] Her death in 1838 cut the marriage short after three years. They had two daughters, Lady Georgiana Adelaide Russell (1836–1922), who married Archibald Peel and had a daughter, Grace (1878–1973); and Lady Victoria Russell (1838–1880), who married the Rev. Henry Montagu Villiers, and left many descendants.[31]
On 20 July 1841 Russell married his second wife, Lady Frances Anna-Maria Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, daughter of Gilbert Elliot, 2nd Earl of Minto. Their children were John Russell, Viscount Amberley (1842–1876), George Gilbert William Russell (1848–1933); Francis Albert Rollo Russell (1849–1914) and Mary Augusta Russell (1853–1933). They lived at Pembroke Lodge, Richmond Park.[32]
Russell and his second wife brought up the children of his eldest son Lord Amberley, orphaned by the deaths of their mother Katharine Russell, Viscountess Amberley in 1874 and their father two years later. These included philosopher Bertrand Russell, who recalled his grandfather in his later life as "a kindly old man in a wheelchair."[33]
The 1st Earl Russell is buried at the 'Bedford Chapel' at St. Michael’s Church, Chenies.
Legacy
He was succeeded as Liberal leader by former Peelite William Gladstone, and was thus the last true Whig to serve as Prime Minister. Generally taken as the model for Anthony Trollope's Mr Mildmay, aspects of his character may also have suggested those of Plantagenet Palliser. An ideal statesman, said Trollope, should have "unblemished, unextinguishable, inexhaustible love of country... . But he should also be scrupulous, and, as being scrupulous, weak."[34]
The 1832 Reform Act and extension of the franchise to British cities are partly attributed to his efforts. He also worked for emancipation, leading the attack on the Test and Corporation acts, which were repealed in 1828, as well as towards legislation limiting working hours in factories in the 1847 Factory Act, and the Public Health Act of 1848.
His government's approach to dealing with the Great Irish Famine is now widely condemned as counterproductive, ill-informed and disastrous. Russell himself was sympathetic to the plight of the Irish poor, and many of his relief proposals were blocked by his cabinet or by the British Parliament.[35]
Queen Victoria's attitude to Russell had been coloured by his role in the Aberdeen administration. On visiting Windsor Castle to resign, Aberdeen had told the Queen: "Nothing could have been better," he said, "than the feeling of the members towards each other. Had it not been for the incessant attempts of drd John Russell to keep up party differences, it must be acknowledged that the experiment of a coalition had succeeded admirably," which attitude she shared.[36] The Queen continued to criticise Russell for his behaviour for the rest of his life, and on his death in 1878 her journal records that he was, "A man of much talent, who leaves a name behind him, kind, & good, with a great knowledge of the constitution, who behaved very well, on many trying occasions; but he was impulsive, very selfish (as shown on many occasions, especially during Ld Aberdeen's administration) vain, & often reckless & imprudent.
Russell's governments
- First Russell ministry (July 1846–February 1852)
- Second Russell ministry (October 1865–June 1866)
Literature
In 1819 Lord John Russell published his book Life of Lord Russell about his famous ancestor, William Russell, 1st Duke of Bedford; and a year later his Essays and Sketches of Life and Character, "By a Gentleman who has left his lodgings" (1820), a series of social and cultural commentaries ostensibly found in a missing lodger's rooms.[37]
In 1822 Russell published a historical drama Don Carlos : or, Persecution. A tragedy, in five acts.[38]
Between 1853 and 1856, he edited the Memoirs, Journal and Correspondence of Thomas Moore, which was published by Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans over 8 volumes.[39][40]
A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens was dedicated to Lord John Russell, "In remembrance of many public services and private kindnesses."[41]
Ancestry
See also
- Internationalization of the Danube River
- Confederate States of America: International diplomacy
References
- ↑ E. L. Woodward, The Age of Reform, 1815-1870 (2nd ed . 1962) p 95
- ↑ A. J. P. Taylor, Essays in English History (1976) p 67
- 1 2 History of Parliament article by R.G. Thorne.
- ↑ John Prest, Lord John Russell (University of South Carolina Press, 1972), 11-13.
- ↑ Walpole, Spencer (1889). The Life of Lord John Russell - Volume I (2nd ed.). London: Longmans, Green & Co. pp. 74–5.
- ↑ Walpole Vol I pp 69-70
- ↑ another source uses the nickname "Finality John", RUSSELL, John, Earl, known best as Lord John Russell, The Nuttall Encyclopaedia, (Project Gutenburg, e book, 1956)
- ↑ Hawkins, Angus (2007). The forgotten Prime Minister - the 14th Earl of Derby (Volume I) (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 152. ISBN 9780199204403.
- ↑ Prest (2009)
- ↑ A. J. P. Taylor, Essays in English History (1976)
- ↑ Walpole Vol I pp410-6
- ↑ Walpole p422
- ↑ Walpole pp423-4
- ↑ Walple Vol I pp 454-5
- ↑ Walpole, Spencer (1889). The Life of Lord John Russell Volume II (2nd ed.). London: Longman, Green and Co. pp. 1–10.
- ↑ Walpole Vol II pp13-25
- ↑ Chambers, James (2004). Palmerston - 'The People's Darling' (First ed.). London: John Murray. p. 313. ISBN 0719554527.
- ↑ Walpole Vol II pp56-60
- ↑ Walpole Vol II pp 61-2
- ↑ Chambers pp323-4
- ↑ Walpole Vol II p143
- 1 2 3 Prest, 2009
- ↑ B. K. Martin, "The Resignation of Lord Palmerston in 1853: Extracts from Unpublished Letters of Queen Victoria and Lord Aberdeen", Cambridge Historical Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1923), pp. 107-112, Cambridge University Press, JSTOR
- 1 2 Stuart J. Reid, Lord John Russell (1895) ch 10
- ↑ Orlando Figes, The Crimean War: A History (2010) pp 107-14
- ↑ Stuart J. Reid, Lord John Russell (1895) ch 11
- ↑ Stuart J. Reid, Lord John Russell (1895) ch 12-13
- ↑ Stuart J. Reid, Lord John Russell (1895) ch 14
- ↑ Lord John Russell, Hansard search
- ↑ Paul Scherer, Lord John Russell: A Biography (1999) pp 80-82
- ↑ Stuart J. Reid, Lord John Russell (1895)
- ↑ Scherer, p 135
- ↑ Ronald Clark, The Life of Bertrand Russell (1978) ch 1
- ↑ Quoted in Blair G. Kenney, "Trollope's Ideal Statesmen: Plantagenet Palliser and Lord John Russell" in Nineteenth-Century Fiction, Vol. 20, No. 3. (Dec., 1965), pp. 281-285.
- ↑ Scherer, p 158
- ↑ Queen Victoria's Journals, Tuesday 30th January 1855, Windsor Castle, Princess Beatrice's copies, Volume:39 (1 January 1855-30 June 1855), pp. 47-48, Online from the Bodleian Library
- ↑ [Russell, Lord John]. Essays and Sketches ... (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, 1820)
- ↑ Internet Archive: Don Carlos : or, Persecution. A tragedy, in five acts (1822)
- ↑ Internet Archive: Details: Memoirs, journal, and correspondence of Thomas Moore. Ed. by the Right Honourable Lord John Russell, M.P
- ↑ Internet Archive: Details: Memoirs, journal, and correspondence of Thomas Moore. Ed. by the Right Honourable Lord John Russell, M.P
- ↑ Dickens, Charles (1866), A Tale of Two Cities (First ed.), London: Chapman and Hall, pp. iii, retrieved 2013-01-05
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 81-2.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 83-4
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 81 ; she was the daughter and heiress of John Howland of Streatham, Surrey, and his wife, Elizabeth Child, daughter of Sir Josiah Child, Baronet.
- 1 2 Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 84-5
- 1 2 Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 83.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 83 ; she was a daughter of Evelyn Pierrepont, Duke of Kingston.
- 1 2 3 Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 6, 1895, p. 450.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1910, pp. 91
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 84.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1910, pp. 93 ; she was the daughter and heiress of Adam van der Duyn, Lord of St. Gravenmoer (in Holland).
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 4, 1916, p. 219.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1910, pp. 94.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, 1910, pp. 94 ; she was the dowager Baroness Belayse and a daughter of Francis Brudenell, Lord Brudenell.
- ↑ Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 410.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 411.
- ↑ Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 410 ; daughter of James Master, of East Langdon, Kent, and his wife, Joice, daughter of Christopher Turner, of Milton Erneys, Bedfordshire.
- ↑ Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 411 ; son of Sir Peter Daniel of Clapham, Surrey ; also commonly spelt "Lionel" ; a portrait of him hung in Yotes Court (see J.P. Neale and T. Moule, Views of the Seats or Noblemen and Gentlemen, vol. 4, 1828 [no page numbers]).
- ↑ E. Hasted, The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent, vol. 5, 1797, p. 84 ; "Mr. James Master resided here [Yokes Place], where he died in 1689 [...] he left three sons and two daughters [...] The daughters were [...] and Martha, who married Lionel Daniel, esq., of Surry [sic], by whom she had William, his heir, and a daughter Elizabeth, married to George, late lord viscount Torrington".
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422 ; daughter of John Cecil, fifth Earl of Exeter.
- ↑ Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 411 ; Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422 ; of Caledon and Kinard, county Tyrone.
- ↑ Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422 ; daughter of Most Rev. Anthony Dopping, Bishop of Meath.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Wood, James, ed. (1907). "article name needed". The Nuttall Encyclopædia. London and New York: Frederick Warne.
Bibliography
- Chamberlain, Muriel E. (1983). Lord Aberdeen: A Political Biography. London.
- Halevy, Elie (1950). "The Triumph of Reform 1830-1841". History of the English People in the Nineteeth Century. 3. detailed political narrative
- Halevy, Elie (1951). "Victorian Years". History of the English People in the Nineteeth Century. 4. detailed political narrative
- Krein, David F. (1976). "War And Reform: Russell, Palmerston and the Struggle for Power in the Aberdeen Cabinet, 1853-54". Maryland Historian. 7#2.
- Partridge, M. S. (1987). "The Russell Cabinet and National Defence, 1846-1852". History. 72# 235.
- Prest, John (2009) [2004]. "Russell, John, first Earl Russell (1792–1878)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Retrieved 31 Aug 2014. short scholarly biography
- Prest, John M. (1972). Lord John Russell. Macmillan. a scholarly biography
- Prest, J. M. (1966). "Gladstone and Russell". Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 16.
- Reid, Stuart Johnson (1895). Lord John Russell.
- Saunders, Robert (2005). "Lord John Russell and Parliamentary Reform, 1848-67". English Historical Review. 120#489. JSTOR 3491041.
- Scherer, Paul (1999). Lord John Russell: A Biography. a scholarly biography
- Scherer, Paul H. (1987). "Partner or Puppet? Lord John Russell at the Foreign Office, 1859-1862". Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies. JSTOR 4050465.
- Taylor, A. J. P. (1976). Essays in English History.
- Wyatt, Tilby A. (1931). Lord John Russell: A study in civil and religious liberty. London.
- Woodward, Llewellyn (1962) [1938]. "The Age of Reform, 1815-1870" (2nd ed.). Oxford History of England. political narrative and analysis
Historiography
- Beales, Derek (1974). "Peel, Russell and Reform". Historical Journal. 17#4. JSTOR 2638561.
- Loades, David Michael (2003). Reader's guide to British history.
External links
Wikisource has original works written by or about: John Russell, 1st Earl Russell |
Wikiquote has quotations related to: John Russell, 1st Earl Russell |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to John Russell, 1st Earl Russell. |
- Lord John Russell 1st Earl Russell, short biography from the 10 Downing Street website
- Hansard 1803–2005: contributions in Parliament by Lord John Russell
- Lord John Russell 1792-1878 biography from the Liberal Democrat History Group
- Lord John Russell by Stuart J. Reid
- Works by or about John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at Internet Archive
- Works by John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- More about Earl Russell on the Downing Street website
- Pembroke Lodge (principal residence and museum)
- Portraits of John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at the National Portrait Gallery, London
Political offices | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded by John Calcraft |
Paymaster of the Forces 1830–1834 |
Succeeded by Sir Edward Knatchbull, Bt |
Preceded by Viscount Althorp |
Leader of the House of Commons 1834 |
Succeeded by Sir Robert Peel |
Preceded by Henry Goulburn |
Home Secretary 1835–1839 |
Succeeded by The Marquess of Normanby |
Preceded by Sir Robert Peel, Bt |
Leader of the House of Commons 1835–1841 |
Succeeded by Sir Robert Peel, Bt |
Preceded by The Marquess of Normanby |
Secretary of State for War and the Colonies 1839–1841 |
Succeeded by Lord Stanley |
Preceded by Sir Robert Peel, Bt |
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom 30 June 1846 – 23 February 1852 |
Succeeded by The Earl of Derby |
Leader of the House of Commons 1846–1852 |
Succeeded by Benjamin Disraeli | |
Preceded by The Earl of Malmesbury |
Foreign Secretary 1852–1853 |
Succeeded by The Earl of Clarendon |
Preceded by Benjamin Disraeli |
Leader of the House of Commons 1852–1855 |
Succeeded by The Viscount Palmerston |
Preceded by The Earl Granville |
Lord President of the Council 1854–1855 |
Succeeded by The Earl Granville |
Preceded by Sidney Herbert |
Secretary of State for the Colonies 1855 |
Succeeded by Sir William Molesworth, Bt |
Preceded by The Earl of Malmesbury |
Foreign Secretary 1859–1865 |
Succeeded by The Earl of Clarendon |
Preceded by The Viscount Palmerston |
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom 29 October 1865 – 28 June 1866 |
Succeeded by The Earl of Derby |
Parliament of the United Kingdom | ||
Preceded by Lord William Russell Richard Fitzpatrick |
Member of Parliament for Tavistock 1813–1817 Served alongside: Lord William Russell |
Succeeded by Lord William Russell Lord Robert Spencer |
Preceded by Lord William Russell Lord Robert Spencer |
Member of Parliament for Tavistock 1818–1820 With: Lord William Russell 1818–1819 John Peter Grant 1819–1820 |
Succeeded by John Peter Grant John Nicholas Fazakerly |
Preceded by William Henry Fellowes Lord Frederick Montagu |
Member of Parliament for Huntingdonshire 1820–1826 Served alongside: William Henry Fellowes |
Succeeded by William Henry Fellowes Viscount Mandeville |
Preceded by Viscount Duncannon |
Member of Parliament for Bandon 1826–1830 |
Succeeded by Viscount Bernard |
Preceded by Viscount Ebrington Lord William Russell |
Member of Parliament for Tavistock 1830–1831 Served alongside: Lord William Russell |
Succeeded by Lord William Russell John Heywood Hawkins |
Preceded by Sir Thomas Dyke Acland Viscount Ebrington |
Member of Parliament for Devonshire 1831–1832 Served alongside: Viscount Ebrington |
Constituency abolished |
New constituency | Member of Parliament for Devonshire South 1832–1835 With: John Crocker Bulteel 1832–1835 Sir John Yarde-Buller 1835 |
Succeeded by Sir John Yarde-Buller Montague Parker |
Preceded by William Henry Hyett George Poulett Scrope |
Member of Parliament for Stroud 1835–1841 Served alongside: George Poulett Scrope |
Succeeded by George Poulett Scrope William Henry Stanton |
Preceded by Sir Matthew Wood George Grote William Crawford James Pattison |
Member of Parliament for City of London 1841–1861 With: Sir Matthew Wood 1841–1843 John Masterman 1841–1857 George Lyall 1841–1847 James Pattison 1843–1849 Lionel de Rothschild 1847–1861 Sir James Duke 1849–1861 Robert Wigram Crawford 1857–1861 |
Succeeded by Lionel de Rothschild Sir James Duke Robert Wigram Crawford Western Wood |
Party political offices | ||
Preceded by The Viscount Melbourne |
Leader of the British Whig Party 1842–1855 Served alongside: The Marquess of Lansdowne 1842–1846 |
Succeeded by The Viscount Palmerston |
Preceded by Viscount Althorp |
Whig Leader in the Commons 1834–1855 |
Succeeded by The Viscount Palmerston |
Preceded by The Viscount Palmerston |
Leader of the British Liberal Party 1865–1866 |
Succeeded by William Ewart Gladstone |
Preceded by The Earl Granville |
Leader of the Liberals in the House of Lords 1865–1868 |
Succeeded by The Earl Granville |
Academic offices | ||
Preceded by Andrew Rutherfurd |
Rector of the University of Glasgow 1846–1847 |
Succeeded by William Mure |
Preceded by Lord Barcaple |
Rector of the University of Aberdeen 1863–1866 |
Succeeded by Mountstuart Elphinstone Grant Duff |
Preceded by George Grote |
President of the Royal Historical Society 1873–1878 |
Succeeded by Henry Bruce, 1st Baron Aberdare |
Honorary titles | ||
Preceded by The Viscount Palmerston |
Oldest living Prime Minister of the United Kingdom 1865–1878 |
Succeeded by The Earl of Beaconsfield |
Peerage of the United Kingdom | ||
New creation | Earl Russell 1861–1878 |
Succeeded by Frank Russell |