United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008

United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008
November 4, 2008

Nominee Al Franken Norm Coleman Dean Barkley
Party DFL Republican Independence
Popular vote 1,212,629[1] 1,212,317[1] 437,505[2]
Percentage 41.99% 41.98% 15.15%

County results

U.S. Senator before election

Norm Coleman

Elected U.S. Senator

Al Franken

The 2008 United States Senate election in Minnesota took place on November 4, 2008. After a legal battle lasting over eight months, Al Franken from the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL) defeated Republican incumbent Norm Coleman in one of the closest elections in the history of the Senate. Al Franken took his oath of office on July 7, 2009, more than half a year after the beginning of his term on January 3, 2009.[3]

When the initial count was completed on November 18, Franken was trailing Coleman by 215 votes.[4][5] This close margin triggered a mandatory recount.[6][7] After reviewing ballots that had been challenged during the recount and counting 953 wrongly rejected absentee ballots, the State Canvassing Board officially certified the recount results with Franken holding a 225-vote lead.[2][8][9]

On January 6, 2009, Coleman's campaign filed an election contest and on April 13, a three-judge panel dismissed Coleman's Notice of Contest and ruled that Franken had won the election by 312 votes.[1][10] Coleman’s appeal of the panel's decision to the Minnesota Supreme Court was unanimously rejected on June 30,[11] and he conceded the election.[12] Al Franken was sworn in as the junior Senator from Minnesota on July 7, 2009.[13]


The general election was among candidates nominated by three major parties, the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (DFL), the Republican Party of Minnesota (R), and Independence Party of Minnesota, as well as two other parties, the Libertarian Party (L) and the Constitution Party (C). The Green Party failed to nominate a candidate.[14]


In Minnesota candidates are generally endorsed by their political party before the party primaries. The Republican Party endorsed Norm Coleman,[17] the DFL Party Al Franken,[18] and the Independence Party Stephen Williams. In total 18 candidates had filed to run in the statewide primaries, including seven for the DFL Party, two for the Republican Party, seven for the Independence Party, one for the Libertarian Party, and one for the Constitution Party.[19][20]

Notable challengers included former Ventura administration official Jack Uldrich and former Senator Dean Barkley for the IP nomination; lawyer and vocal Franken critic Priscilla Lord Faris for the DFL nomination; and dentist and fugitive[21] Jack Shepard for the Republican nomination. Minneapolis attorney Mike Ciresi also campaigned for the DFL endorsement, but dropped out on March 10. Each party's respective primary was held on September 9, resulting in Barkley, Franken and Coleman on the general election ballot.


2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Primary Election (Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party)[22]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
DFL Al Franken 164,136 65.34%
DFL Priscilla Lord Faris 74,655 29.72%
DFL Dick Franson 3,923 1.56%
DFL Bob Larson 3,152 1.25%
DFL Rob Fitzgerald 3,095 1.23%
DFL Ole Savior 1,227 0.49%
DFL Alve Erickson 1,017 0.40%
Turnout 251,205

The following candidates sought an endorsement at the party's convention, but dropped out after Al Franken was endorsed: Mike Ciresi, Jim Cohen and Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer


2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Primary Election (Independence Party)[22]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Independence Dean Barkley 6,678 58.88%
Independence Jack Uldrich 1,405 12.39%
Independence Stephen Williams 800 7.05%
Independence Kurt Michael Anderson 761 6.71%
Independence Doug Williams 639 5.63%
Independence Darryl Stanton 618 5.45%
Independence Bill Dahn 440 3.88%
Turnout 11,341

Though Stephen Williams was endorsed by the Independence Party, he lost to Dean Barkley by over 51 points and was third place in the primary behind Jack Uldrich.


2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Primary Election (Republican Party)[22]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Republican Norm Coleman (Incumbent) 130,973 91.32%
Republican Jack Shepard 12,456 8.68%
Turnout 143,429


2007 year-end reports filed with the Federal Election Commission showed that Al Franken had raised $7.04 million through December 31, 2007 while Norm Coleman had raised $6.24 million. Year-end cash on hand was $6.04 million for Coleman and $3.10 million for Franken.[23]

Pre-primary reports filed with the FEC that cover finances through August 20 show Coleman having raised $16.76 million (with $5.61 million on hand). Franken had raised $13.09 million (with $2.37 million on hand), and Barkley had raised $14,374 (with $5,071 on hand).[24]

A report in late October, by the Star Tribune, showed Barkley having raised $56,763 for his campaign.[25]


In June 2008, Senator John Ensign, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, stated that the Minnesota Senate race would be one of the ten most competitive Senate races.[26] CQ Politics rated this race as 'No Clear Favorite'.[27] The Cook Political Report considered it a 'Toss-Up'.[28] The Rothenberg Political Report considered it a 'Narrow Advantage for Incumbent Party'.[29]


Early polling showed Coleman with a large lead over his prospective Democratic opponents. The Senate race narrowed considerably, however, to become one of the most hotly contested elections in the nation in 2008. A January 29, 2008, Minnesota Public Radio poll showed the first lead for Franken.[30] Barkley consistently polled in the 15–20% range and was unable to break past 20%.

Poll source Dates administered Coleman
Barkley (IP)
Survey USA November 1, 2008 44% 39% 16%
Rasmussen Reports October 28, 2008 43% 39% 14%
Rasmussen Reports October 22, 2008 37% 41% 17%
University of Wisconsin–Madison October 19–22, 2008 34% 40% 15%
St. Cloud State University October 14–22, 2008 36% 27% 16%
Minneapolis Star Tribune October 21, 2008 36% 39% 18%
Survey USA October 8–18, 2008 41% 39% 18%
Quinnipiac University October 8–12, 2008 36% 38% 18%
Rasmussen Reports October 7, 2008 37% 43% 17%
Minneapolis Star Tribune September 30 – October 2, 2008 34% 43% 18%
SurveyUSA September 30 – October 1, 2008 43% 33% 19%
Quinnipiac September 14–21, 2008 49% 42%
Rasmussen Reports September 18, 2008 48% 47% 3%
Minneapolis Star-Tribune September 10–12, 2008 41% 37% 13%
Survey USA September 12, 2008 41% 40% 14%
Survey USA August 18, 2008 46% 39%
Minnesota Public Radio August 17, 2008 40% 41%
Rasmussen Reports August 13, 2008 49% 46%
Quinnipiac July 24, 2008 53% 38%
Rasmussen Reports July 22, 2008 46% 49%
Rasmussen Reports July 10, 2008 42% 44%
KSTP**[31] June 13, 2008 48% 37% 8%
Rasmussen Reports June 9, 2008 48% 45%
Quinnipiac June 26, 2008 51% 41%
Survey USA June 10–12, 2008 52% 40%
Rasmussen Reports June 11, 2008 48% 45%
Rasmussen Reports May 22, 2008 47% 45%
Minneapolis Star-Tribune May 12–15, 2008 51% 44%
Survey USA April 30 – May 1, 2008 52% 42%
Rasmussen Reports April 22, 2008 50% 43%
Rasmussen Reports March 19, 2008 48% 46%
Survey USA March 12, 2008 51% 41%
McLaughlin & Associates March 6–9, 2008 46% 40%
Minnesota Public Radio/Humphrey Institute January 20–27, 2008 40% 43%
Minnesota Public Radio/Mason Dixon May 7–9, 2007 54% 32%


After all the votes were tallied, Coleman led Franken by 215 votes – well under the one half of one percent margin that triggers a mandatory recount according to state law.

Early on November 5, news organizations including the Associated Press, Minnesota Public Radio, and Fox News[32] had called the election for Coleman. NPR and the AP uncalled the race mere hours later.[33] Coleman declared himself the victor, and suggested that Franken waive his right to a recount. Franken was unwilling to do so.[34]

Since the unofficial results were first posted on the Minnesota Secretary of State's website, Coleman's lead had narrowed from 726 votes on November 5 to the official pre-recount tally of 215 votes on November 18. Secretary of State Mark Ritchie called these changes "well within the normal range in the days immediately following an election, when county officials double check and verify election night tabulations reported to the secretary of state's office," while Coleman's campaign decried the "improbable shifts that are overwhelmingly accruing to the benefit of Al Franken."[35] An independent analysis of statewide elections over the prior 10 years showed that the average change in vote totals as reported on election night compared to the certified result is 1,500 votes.[36] The results were certified by each county's canvassing board and then on November 18, 2008, by the Minnesota State Canvassing Board.

2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election: Results certified November 18[4][37][38]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
Republican Norm Coleman (Incumbent) 1,211,590 41.988% −7.541%
DFL Al Franken 1,211,375 41.981% −5.355%
Independence Dean Barkley 437,404 15.19% +13.16%
Libertarian Charles Aldrich 13,916 0.48% n/a
Constitution James Niemackl 8,905 0.31% +0.21%
Write-ins 2,365 0.08%
Plurality 215 0.007%
Turnout 2,885,555

Note: The ±% column reflects the change in total number of votes won by each party from the previous election. Additionally, votes cast for Paul Wellstone in the 2002 election are not factored into the DFL's total from that year.


Recounting ballots by hand in Olmsted County.

In accordance with state law, the Minnesota State Canvassing Board ordered a hand recount in the Senate race[39] Representatives of Coleman and Franken observed the sorting and recounting of the ballots at 120 locations across the state on November 19, and largely finished on December 5. The votes were counted locally, but ballots that were challenged by either campaign were sent to the state capital for consideration by the State Canvassing Board. The board was a five-person panel consisting of Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Magnuson, Justice G. Barry Anderson, Ramsey County District Court Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and Assistant Chief Judge Edward Cleary; they made determination of the voters' intent for ballots where either of the campaign's representatives disagreed with the election officials at the county sites. Of the five Canvassing Board members, Ritchie was an elected DFLer, the two justices were appointed by a Republican governor, one judge was appointed by an Independence Party governor, and one was elected in a non-partisan election.[40]

Hennepin County ballot paper.

Of the 4130 precincts in Minnesota, one had to delay reporting its totals because election officials deduced that 133 ballots, all contained in a single envelope, had gone missing during the recount process.[41] After days of searching,[42] the State Canvassing Board decided to use that precinct's election day totals, which included the missing 133 votes.[43] The 133 missing ballots contributed a net 46 votes for Franken.

By the end of the recount, each candidate had gained votes. In total, Coleman had challenged 3,377 ballots and Franken had challenged 3,278. These ballots were set aside until the State Canvassing Board could meet on December 16 to decide the fate of challenged ballots. Ritchie's office, however, insisted that each campaign voluntarily withdraw some of their challenges, due to the strain a large pile of ballot challenges would place on the State Canvassing Board. On December 3, Al Franken's campaign withdrew 633 of their challenges, and said that they would withdraw more at a later date.[44] The next day, Coleman's campaign responded by withdrawing 650 challenges.[45] By the time all of the ballots that Franken's campaign challenged were examined, he had only 420 challenges left that had not been withdrawn,[46][47] while Coleman's campaign had roughly 1,000.[48] The Secretary of State's website had noted that none of the withdrawn ballot challenges were reflected in the running tally of the recount.[49]

By December 19, the State Canvassing Board had largely concluded their review of ballot challenges from each campaign. Of the 1,325 ballots that were reviewed, 319 were awarded to Coleman, 758 were awarded to Franken, and 248 were labeled "other". According to the AP,[50] MPR[51] and the Star Tribune,[52] the resolution of these challenges marked the first time Franken had taken a lead in the recount. On December 30, the board finished reallocating the withdrawn challenges, completing this phase of the recount and leaving Franken with a 49-vote lead.[53][54][55][56]

One of the last—and largest—sources of uncertainty had been the absentee ballots which had been improperly rejected by election officials during the original count. Franken's campaign asked for these ballots to be tallied by each county and counted in the recount results, while Coleman's campaign said the canvassing board did not have the authority to deal with the ballots. On December 8, some counties began sorting rejected absentee ballots to find out how many were incorrectly rejected.[57] On December 12, the Board voted unanimously to recommend counties sort through their rejected absentee ballots, setting aside any that were incorrectly rejected, and to resubmit their vote totals with the incorrectly rejected ballots included.[58] The Coleman campaign filed suit with the state Supreme Court to temporarily halt such counting until "a standard procedure" could be determined,[59] but the State Supreme Court ruled on December 18 that the improperly rejected absentee ballots be included in the recount.[60] The Court also prescribed that a standard procedure be established by the Secretary of State's office in conjunction with the two campaigns.

As of December 30, county officials had found about 1,350 wrongly rejected ballots. The Franken campaign agreed to count all of those ballots, while the Coleman campaign agreed to a subset, and also wanted to reconsider more than 700 other absentee ballots. On December 30 and 31, representatives of both campaigns met with officials in each county and sorted through the absentee ballots. After some ballots were rejected by one campaign or the other, 953 ballots were sent to the secretary of state's office. The "fifth pile" of wrongly rejected absentee ballots were opened, checked for identifying marks, and counted (where found eligible) on January 3, 2009. Of the 933 ballots that were found to be eligible, 481 were for Franken; 305 were for Coleman; and 147 were for other candidates, were overvotes, or undervotes. The process was broadcast live online.

The state canvassing board certified the recounted vote totals on January 5 with Franken ahead by 225 votes.[8] Former Minnesota Governor Arne Carlson, a Republican who did not endorse a candidate in the 2008 Senate race, called for Coleman to concede.[61]

2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election: Results certified January 5, 2009[2][62][63]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
DFL Al Franken 1,212,431 41.991% −5.35%
Republican Norm Coleman (Incumbent) 1,212,206 41.984% −7.55%
Independence Dean Barkley 437,505 15.15% +13.15%
Libertarian Charles Aldrich 13,923 0.48% n/a
Constitution James Niemackl 8,907 0.31% +0.21%
Write-ins 2,365 0.08%
Plurality 225 0.007%
Turnout 2,887,337 †

Note: The ±% column reflects the change in total number of votes won by each party from the previous election. Additionally, votes cast for Paul Wellstone in the 2002 election are not factored into the DFL's total from that year.

Election certificate

After the Canvassing Board finished the recount, the next step was for the state to issue an official certificate of election. State law requires a seven-day delay from the Canvassing Board's final report until the certificate can be issued and signed by Ritchie and Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty. Furthermore, state law states that a certificate cannot be issued if an election contest is pending.[64][65]

On January 12, 2009, Franken sent a letter to Ritchie and Pawlenty requesting an election certificate. Both declined, citing the unresolved election contest by Coleman.[66] Later that day, Franken filed suit in Federal court to force the state to issue a certificate, claiming that federal law relating to Senate elections superseded state law.[66] The next day his campaign asked the Minnesota Supreme Court to require Pawlenty and Ritchie to issue the certificate,[65] and the court held a hearing on the suit on February 5, 2009.[67]

Texas Senator John Cornyn said that GOP senators were prepared to filibuster the seating of the canvassing board's declared winner until a signed election certificate is available, as provided under Minnesota law.[64][68] On January 21, 2009, the day after the inauguration of Democratic President Barack Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that Senate Democrats are "going to try to seat Al Franken" at least provisionally until the challenge is resolved. Reid also said that there was "not a question in anyone's mind . . . that there's been any fraud or wrongdoing in this election." Senate Republican leaders countered this by insisting that Franken respect Minnesota laws and allow the completion of the legal review.[69][70]

Election contest

Coleman filed a contest of the election results in the Ramsey County District Court on January 6, 2009.[71] In it, he alleged ballot counting irregularities which, if corrected, would result in his winning the election.[72] Among other issues, he alleged that there were double-counted duplicate ballots, 654 valid absentee votes rejected as invalid by county election officials,[73][74] and problems in dealing with the lost ballots in a Minneapolis precinct.[72][75]

Under Minnesota law the chief justice of the state Supreme Court appoints a three-judge panel to hear an election contest. Because Chief Justice Magnuson had served on the state canvassing board, he recused himself, passing the task to Alan Page, the senior justice on the court.[76] Page chose Judge Elizabeth A. Hayden of Stearns County (who was first appointed by DFL governor Rudy Perpich) to preside over the contest. Assistant Chief Judge Kurt J. Marben of Pennington County (appointed by Independence Party governor Jesse Ventura) and Assistant Chief Judge Denise D. Reilly of Hennepin County (appointed by Republican governor Arne Carlson) were also appointed.[77]

On January 12, 2009, Franken filed a motion to dismiss Coleman's contest, claiming it was "an imprecise and scattershot pleading". He argued that even if the contest were to proceed, the three-judge panel should be limited to determining who would be awarded the already certified ballots and to a simple, mathematical recount to ensure the accuracy of the canvassing board's count, while no additional ballots should be reviewed.[71] On January 22, 2009, Franken's attorneys also argued that the case should not go to trial because the U.S. Senate itself, rather than the court system, has the power under the United States Constitution to judge the election of its own members.[78] Franken's motion to dismiss was denied by the panel on January 23.[79]

On January 19, 2009, Coleman attorney Fritz Knaak requested that the court open and review all rejected absentee ballots – totaling roughly 12,000 – because some of them, he contended, were improperly rejected.[80] Coleman's attorneys also proposed a multiple phase trial that would not start until February 2, in which the first phase would focus on rejected absentee ballots.[81] The panel denied these requests on January 23.[79][82]

The trial began on January 26. Coleman's legal team ran into trouble on the first day when the judges refused to enter into evidence copies of the envelopes from allegedly wrongly rejected absentee ballots. Coleman's team had marked on some of their copies of the envelopes, so the panel ruled that Coleman's attorney would need to subpoena the original absentee ballot envelopes from the counties.[83]

On February 3 the judges agreed to consider 4,797 rejected absentee ballots. This was fewer than the number requested by Coleman but greater than Franken requested. These ballots fall into two categories: those where voters appeared to have met all legal requirements, and those where voters ran afoul of the law through no fault of their own.[84]

On February 13 the court ruled that no evidence had been presented to establish widespread problems with the counting of absentee ballots and that rejected absentee ballots from 12 of 19 disputed categories would not be counted. According to Coleman's attorney, this left approximately 3,500 ballots still open for consideration. The order also specified that parties must demonstrate that disputed ballots were legally cast, not just that they should not have been rejected, making it more difficult to argue in favor of counting remaining absentee ballots.[85][86]

On March 2, the Coleman team rested its case after five weeks of testimony. The contest resumed on March 3 with the Franken team presenting its counter arguments. On March 13, the trial portion of the contest concluded with closing argument from both sides. Franken's closing was delivered by attorney Kevin Hamilton and Coleman's by Joseph Friedburg. After the closing arguments, Franken lead attorney Marc Elias stated: "After seven weeks of trial, hundreds of witnesses, and thousands of exhibits, the trial demonstrated what the state canvassing board found to be true after an exhaustive recount: that Al Franken got more votes on Election Day than Norm Coleman. We remain confident that the court will uphold the results of the election and allow Al Franken to begin the work the voters of Minnesota hired him to do."[87]

On March 31, the court issued an order to count at most 400 rejected absentee ballots and denied any other relief.[88][89] On April 7, the court scrutinized these ballots and determined that 351 had been legally cast. Those votes were counted, with 111 going to Coleman, 198 to Franken, and 42 to Other, giving Franken a final margin of 312 votes.[90]

The court dismissed Coleman's suit "with prejudice" in its final ruling on April 13, finding that his claims had no merit and ordering the Coleman camp to pay the legal costs associated with Coleman's failure to disclose information about Pamela Howell, a precinct election judge and witness in the case,[1] which was later determined to amount to $94,783.[91] In the same ruling, the court also rejected Coleman's claim to exclude 132 missing ballots from the recount total and his request to adjust the results based on Coleman's allegations of double counted ballots.[10][92]

2008 Minnesota U.S. Senate Election: Certified Results after election contest[1][2][62][63]
Party Candidate Votes % ±
DFL Al Franken 1,212,629 41.994% −5.35%
Republican Norm Coleman (Incumbent) 1,212,317 41.983% −7.55%
Independence Dean Barkley 437,505 15.151% +13.15%
Libertarian Charles Aldrich 13,923 0.48% n/a
Constitution James Niemackl 8,907 0.31% +0.21%
Write-ins 2,365 0.08%
Plurality 312 0.011%
Turnout 2,887,646
DFL gain from Republican Swing

Note: This table combines the certified results of January 5, 2009, listed above with the added absentee ballots from April 7, 2009, 198 for Franken and 111 for Coleman.

Appeal to Minnesota Supreme Court

On April 20, Coleman filed a notice of appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court.[93] Franken's lawyers requested that the court follow an expedited schedule in hearing the case (with oral arguments scheduled mid May) to enable Minnesota to have two seated Senators.[94][95] In his reply, Coleman asked the Court to take its time, which probably would delay a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court until June, and possibly into yet another appeal to the United States Supreme Court when its 2009 term started in October.[96] On April 24, the Court issued its order for briefs and oral arguments.[97] Oral arguments took place on June 1, 2009.[98] After the arguments the Minnesota Supreme Court did not indicate how soon it would render judgment.[99]

Some Democrats and political commentators asserted that Coleman no longer had a serious chance of prevailing in the election, and that he continued to file appeals for the sole purpose of delaying the seating of the 60th member of the Democratic Caucus in the U.S. Senate (after Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter changed his party affiliation from Republican to Democratic on April 28).[100][101] Sixty Senators would bring the Democrats to a level where they would not need any Republican votes to overcome a Republican filibuster in the Senate for the balance of the Senate term (assuming a straight party-line vote).[102][103][104] Norm Coleman disputed these allegations.[105] About 60% of Minnesotans (64–28, 59–34, 63–37 in three polls) said they wanted Coleman to withdraw.[106]

On June 30, 2009, the Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously rejected Coleman's challenge and stated that Franken was entitled to be certified as the winner. Coleman announced he would not appeal the result further, and congratulated Franken by phone, telling him that being senator was "the best job he would ever have."[107][108] Governor Pawlenty and Secretary of State Ritchie signed the election certificate on the same evening.[109]

Further investigations

In July 2010, Minnesota Majority, a conservative watchdog group, conducted a study in which they flagged 2,803 voters for examination including some 1,359 suspected to be ineligible convicted felons in the largely Democratic Minneapolis-St. Paul area who were suspected of voting illegally in the Senate race.[110][111] Subsequent investigations of Minnesota Majority's claims by election officials found that many of their allegations were incorrect. Some of the cases that were submitted involved mistaking a legal voter for a felon with the same name, others involved felons who had had their voting rights reinstated after serving their sentences, and others were felons who illegally registered to vote, but did not vote in 2008 election.[112][113][114] Ramsey County officials narrowed their investigation to 180 cases, while Hennepin County examined 216 cases.[115]

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty said, "They [Minnesota Majority] seem to have found credible evidence that many felons who are not supposed to be voting actually voted in the Franken-Coleman election. I suspect they favored Al Franken. I don’t know that, but if that turned out to be true, they may have flipped the election.”[116] Columnist Nick Coleman of the Minneapolis-based Star Tribune called the idea that illegal voting by felons made a difference in the race "unbelievable" and the Minnesota Majority report "good fodder for a right-wing scare campaign."[117]

As of July 2010, the Ramsey County Attorney's Office had brought charges against 28 people.[111] In August, 2010, the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office received for investigation 110 alleged cases of voter fraud during the 2008 election. In October, 2010, the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office concluded that there was enough evidence to charge six people for voter fraud. "Three of the suspects face two felony charges. Three other suspects each face one felony charge."[118] In October 2010, Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman announced that charges would be brought against 43 felons for illegally voting in 2008.[119]

See also


  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Judges Elizabeth Hayden; Kurt Marben & Denise Reilley. "Finding of Facts, Conclusion of Law, and Order for Judgment" (PDF). Minnesota Judicial Branch.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Election Reporting". Minnesota Secretary of State. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
  3. "FRANKEN, Al – Biographical Information". US Congress. July 7, 2009. Retrieved July 7, 2009.
  4. 1 2 "State of Minnesota Canvassing Report" (PDF). Minnesota Secretary of State. November 18, 2008. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
  5. "Recount begins in U.S. Senate race; Ritchie hit with 'blizzard' of filings". TwinCities.com. November 19, 2008.
  6. Senate race 100% counted: Coleman up; recount coming, Star Tribune, November 5, 2008.
  7. Patricia Lopez and Bob von Sternberg. Day 4: Ballot-counters press on, find glitches. Star Tribune. November 23, 2008. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
  8. 1 2 "Minnesota canvassing board certifies Franken win". CNN Political Ticker. January 5, 2009. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
  9. Stern, Christopher (January 5, 2009). "Democrat Franken Wins Minnesota Recount, Coleman Vows Challenge". Bloomberg. Retrieved January 5, 2009.
  10. 1 2 Pat Doyle (April 14, 2009). "Judges rule Franken winner; Coleman to appeal". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on April 18, 2009. Retrieved April 14, 2009.
  11. "Minn. Court Rules for Franken in Senate Fight". New York Times. Retrieved June 30, 2009.
  12. "Norm Coleman concedes Minnesota Senate race to Al Franken – Manu Raju and Josh Kraushaar". Politico.Com. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  13. Fiore, Faye (July 8, 2009). "Al Franken sworn in, with a straight face". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 7, 2009.
  14. "Green Party holds state convention". Mngreens.org. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  15. "kstp.com - Ventura out, Barkley in". Archived from the original on August 2, 2008. Retrieved February 11, 2016.
  16. Jesse the Diva gives way to bravado-lite Barkley. Minnesota Post, July 15, 2008. Retrieved November 7, 2008.
  17. Zdechlik, Mark (March 3, 2008). "Coleman campaign ramps up behind the scenes". Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved March 12, 2008.
  18. Les says: (June 7, 2008). "The Big Question » Blog Archive » It's Franken in One". Ww3.startribune.com. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  19. TwinCities.com
  20. "Minnesota Secretary of State". Sos.state.mn.us. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  21. "Jack is back!". Minnesota.publicradio.org. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  22. 1 2 3 "Primary Election Results". Minnesota Secretary of State Website.
  23. Candidate Filings, Federal Election Commission, year-end 2007
  24. "2008 Race: Minnesota Senate—Total Raised and Spent". opensecrets.org. Center for Responsive Politics. September 1, 2008. Retrieved September 18, 2008.
  25. "Five things to know about Dean Barkley". Star Tribune. October 25, 2008. Retrieved November 4, 2008.
  26. Kate Phillips, G.O.P. Leader Maps Senate Elections The New York Times, June 13, 2008
  27. Race Ratings Chart: Senate Archived October 28, 2010, at the Wayback Machine. CQ Politics
  28. 2008 Senate Race Ratings Archived November 20, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. The Cook Political Report, October 9, 2008.
  29. 2008 Senate Ratings The Rothenberg Political Report, September 29, 2008
  30. See Minnesota United States Senate election, 2008#Polling
  31. In the June 13, 2008 poll with Barkley included, you have to watch the video till 2:03. They release the poll results there.
  32. Coleman Appears Victor as Minnesota Goes to Recount Senate Race. FoxNews, November 5, 2008. Retrieved November 7, 2008.
  33. AP uncalls race due to slim margin, Minnesota Public Radio, November 5, 2008. Retrieved November 8, 2008.
  34. Recount: The Coleman-Franken brawl drags on. Star Tribune, November 6, 2008. Retrieved November 7, 2008.
  35. PAT DOYLE; Star Tribune (November 10, 2008). "For Ritchie, keeping recount nonpartisan is main goal". Startribune.com. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  36. Nelson, Tim (November 12, 2008). "Shifting vote totals not unusual". Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved November 13, 2008.
  37. "Canvassing Report of Votes Cast at the State General Election, November 4, 2008" (PDF). Minnesota Secretary of State. November 18, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  38. "Canvassing Board Meeting—Nov. 18, 2008: Official minutes" (PDF). Minnesota Secretary of State. November 18, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  39. Tom Scheck (November 18, 2008). "Canvassing board orders Senate recount".
  40. Scheck, Tom (November 12, 2008). "Key panel named in Minn. Senate recount". Minnesota Public radio. Retrieved November 13, 2008.
  41. Dave Orrick & Jason Hoppin (December 5, 2008). "On last day's eve, envelope with 133 votes is missing". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved December 7, 2008.
  42. Ballot hunt ends, next stage begins St. Paul Pioneer Press.
  43. Kleefeld, Eric (December 12, 2008). "TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo | In Boost To Franken, Minnesota Restores Missing Ballots To The Count". Tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  44. Rachel E. Stassen-Berger & Jason Hoppin (December 4, 2008). "Minnesota U.S. Senate Race / Glut of ballot challenges chokes recount". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved December 4, 2008.
  45. Dave Orrick (December 4, 2008). "Coleman campaign withdraws 650 ballot challenges". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved December 4, 2008.
  46. Pate Doyle, Kevin Duchschere & Bob Von Sternberg (December 18, 2008). "State Canvassing Board faces big challenge today". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on January 22, 2009. Retrieved December 22, 2008.
  47. Ballot hunt ends, next stage begins St. Paul Pioneer Press
  48. Pate Doyle, Kevin Duchschere & Bob Von Sternberg (December 17, 2008). "Senate recount: Trying to fill in the ovals". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009. Retrieved December 22, 2008.
  49. Scheck, Tom (December 17, 2000). "Canvassing Board continues tedious process of reviewing ballots". Retrieved December 17, 2008.
  50. "The Associated Press: Franken opens first lead in Minn. Senate race". Archived from the original on December 22, 2008. Retrieved February 20, 2016.
  51. "Franken takes lead in Senate recount | Minnesota Public Radio NewsQ". Minnesota.publicradio.org. December 19, 2008. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  52. http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/36436799.html. Retrieved December 22, 2008. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  53. "Recount Summary" (PDF). Minnesota Secretary of State. December 30, 2008. Retrieved December 31, 2008.
  54. Rachel E. Stassen-Berger (December 30, 2008). "Franken leads by 50". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
  55. Dave Orrick (December 23, 2008). "The Recount / State high court hears fight over duplicates". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved December 23, 2008.
  56. Brian Bakst (December 23, 2008). "Minnesota won't have new senator before 2009 as board's deliberations spill into new year". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on December 27, 2008. Retrieved December 23, 2008.
  57. Rachel E. Stassen-Berger & Dave Orrick (December 6, 2008). "Senate recount ends amid many questions". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved December 7, 2008.
  58. Kleefeld, Eric (December 12, 2008). "TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo | Franken Gets Big Win At Canvass Board". Tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  59. Post your comment: Title (Optional) Your comments: (December 12, 2008). "Senate recount: 133 + 5 ÷ 87 = 1 big muddle". Startribune.com. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  60. "Court orders rejected absentees into Senate count | Minnesota Public Radio NewsQ". Minnesota.publicradio.org. December 18, 2008. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  61. "Former Gov. Carlson urges Coleman to concede | Minnesota Public Radio NewsQ". Minnesota.publicradio.org. January 6, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  62. 1 2 "Signing Off On A 225 Vote Franken Lead (webcast of Canvassing Board Meeting)". The Uptake. January 5, 2009. Retrieved January 5, 2009.
  63. 1 2 "Final Recount Summary by County" (PDF). Minnesota Secretary of State. January 5, 2009. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
  64. 1 2 "Minnesota Statutes 204C.40 Certificates of Election". Minnesota Office of Revisor of Statutes. Retrieved January 4, 2009.
  65. 1 2 Steller, Chris (January 13, 2009). "Franken to Supreme Court: Make Pawlenty and Ritchie issue election certificate". Minnesota Independent. Retrieved January 13, 2009.
  66. 1 2 Patricia Lopez & Mike Kaszuba (January 12, 2009). "Franken tries to sidestep courts". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on January 22, 2009. Retrieved January 13, 2009.
  67. Page, Alan C. (January 14, 2008). "Order A09-64" (PDF). Minnesota Judicial Branch. Retrieved January 14, 2009.
  68. Welch, Chris (January 3, 2009). "Senate GOP prepared to fight if Dems try to seat Franken". CNN. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
  69. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved January 23, 2009.
  70. Senate Democrats move toward seating Franken Archived January 30, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.
  71. 1 2 Post your comment: Title (Optional) Your comments: (January 7, 2009). "Coleman goes to court over Senate recount". Startribune.com. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  72. 1 2 "Minnesota Senate Seat Election Contest". Minnesota Courts. January 6, 2009. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
  73. Kevin Duchschere & Mike Kaszuba (January 3, 2009). "Franken up 225 with recount complete; focus turns to court". Minneapolis Star-Tribune. Retrieved January 4, 2009.
  74. Rachel E. Stassen-Berger (January 4, 2009). "Franken's lead grows in recount finale". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved January 4, 2009.
  75. Jason Hoppin & Dave Orrick (January 3, 2009). "Recount wrapping up. Then what?". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved January 5, 2009.
  76. Weiner, Jay & Black, Eric (January 8, 2009). "Recount notebook: Musings on Franken-Coleman maneuvers, Supreme Court 'leanings,' and more". MinnPost. Retrieved January 8, 2009.
  77. Weiner, Jay (January 12, 2009). "Judges named to hear Senate election contest; Coleman side reacts colorfully to Franken certificate play". MinnPost. Retrieved January 12, 2009.
  78. Cadei, Emily (January 22, 2009). "Franken Makes Case To Let Senate Decide". CQPolitics. Retrieved January 23, 2009.
  79. 1 2 Condon, Patrick (January 23, 2009). "Franken's motion to dismiss recount suit rejected". Associated Press. Retrieved January 23, 2009.
  80. "Coleman wants to open thousands of absentee ballots". TheHill.com. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  81. MIKE KASZUBA; Star Tribune (January 16, 2009). "Senate recount: Order expected today on trial date". Startribune.com. Archived from the original on March 24, 2009. Retrieved June 13, 2010.
  82. Duchschere, Kevin, (January 16, 2009). "Recount: Trial on Coleman challenge to begin on Jan. 26". Minnesota Star Tribune. Archived from the original on January 21, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
  83. Rachel E. Stassen-Berger (January 27, 2009). "Markings on absentee ballot envelopes upset Coleman case". St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved January 27, 2009.
  84. Condon, Patrick, (February 3, 2009). "5K rejected Minn. Senate ballots get another look". Associated Press. Retrieved February 3, 2009.
  85. Duchschere, Kevin (February 14, 2009). "Recount trial: Coleman dealt blow, but no knockout". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on February 19, 2009. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  86. Dunbar, Elizabeth; Condon, Patrick (February 13, 2009). "Minn. Senate trial judges deliver blow to Coleman". The Huston Chronicle. Archived from the original on February 22, 2009. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  87. Doyle, Pat (March 13, 2009). "Minnesota Senate recount: Sudden sprint to finish line". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on March 16, 2009. Retrieved March 15, 2009.
  88. Judge Elizabeth Hayden (April 1, 2009). "Order for Delivery of Ballots" (PDF). Minnesota Judicial Branch. Retrieved April 14, 2009.
  89. Pat Doyle & Kevin Duchschere (April 1, 2009). "Senate recount trial: Judges' ruling is boon to Franken". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on April 3, 2009. Retrieved April 14, 2009.
  90. Pat Doyle & Kevin Duchschere (April 8, 2009). "Coleman team vows to appeal tally". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on April 10, 2009. Retrieved April 14, 2009.
  91. "Court: Coleman must pay Franken $95,000 in court costs". Star Tribune. June 11, 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2009.
  92. "Al Franken is the winner of Minnesota Senate Race, court rules". New York Daily News. Associated Press. April 14, 2009.
  93. "Coleman keeps promise, files appeal". USA TODAY. April 20, 2009. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009.
  94. "Franken Asks State Supreme Court to Expedite Appeal". MinnPost.com. April 21, 2009. Retrieved April 21, 2009.
  95. Snyder, Richard D. (April 21, 2009). "respondent's Motion for Expedited Schedule" (PDF). MinnPost.com. Retrieved April 21, 2009.
  96. "Coleman asks state Supreme Court to take it slow". Star Tribune. April 22, 2009. Archived from the original on April 25, 2009. Retrieved April 23, 2009.
  97. "ORDER for briefing schedule" (PDF). Minnesota Supreme Court. April 24, 2009. Retrieved April 24, 2009.
  98. "State Supreme Court grills lawyers for Coleman, Franken". Star Tribune. June 1, 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
  99. "Coleman / Franken Senate race reaches the Supreme Court". Star News. June 3, 2009. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  100. "Longtime GOP Sen. Arlen Specter becomes Democrat". CNN. April 28, 2009. Retrieved April 28, 2009.
  101. Cillizza, Chris (April 28, 2009). "Specter to switch parties". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 28, 2009.
  102. Chaggaris, Steve (April 15, 2009). "Morning Bulletin". CBS. Retrieved April 20, 2009.
  103. "The GOP's Senate stall in Minnesota". Chattanooga Times Free Press. April 18, 2009. Retrieved April 20, 2009.
  104. Black, Eric (April 17, 2009). "An explanation for why Coleman hasn't filed notice of appeal". MinnPost. Retrieved April 20, 2009.
  105. "Coleman: 'I think the law is on our side'". Star Tribune. April 17, 2009. Retrieved April 19, 2009.
  106. Brauer, David (April 26, 2009). "Your liberal media: Public says Norm should concede; editorial pages disagree". MinnPost. Retrieved April 28, 2009.
  107. "Minn. Court Rules for Franken in Senate Fight". New York Times. June 30, 2009. Retrieved June 30, 2009.
  108. Weiner, Jay (June 30, 2009). "Senate recount: After unanimous ruling for Franken, attention shifts to Pawlenty – and Coleman". MinnPost. Retrieved June 30, 2009.
  109. Weiner, Jay (June 30, 2009). "Coleman-Franken Senate race: The day the recount ended and the fight turned into something really nice". MinnPost. Retrieved June 30, 2009. and Pawlenty, Tim & Ritchie, Mark (June 30, 2009). "Certificate of Election for Six-Year Term" (PDF). The Minnesota Independent. Center for Independent Media. p. 2. Retrieved June 30, 2009.
  110. Barnes, Ed (July 12, 2010). "Felons Voting Illegally May Have Put Franken Over the Top in Minnesota, Study Finds". Fox News.
  111. 1 2 "Pawlenty: Investigate felon votes in Senate race". Star Tribune.
  112. Kevin Diaz (July 14, 2010). "Pawlenty: Investigate felon votes in Senate race". Star Tribune. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
  113. John Croman (July 15, 2010). "Pawlenty: felons may have tipped Senate race". KARE-11. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
  114. Schroeck, eric (2010-07-13). "Conservative media hype "not accurate" report to suggest Franken's election was "an illegal victory"". Media Matters. Retrieved 2015-05-02.
  115. "Pawlenty: Investigate felon votes in Senate race". Star Tribune.
  116. Ed Barnes. "It's Time for a Closer Look into Whether Felons Voted in 2008, Minnesota GOP Chairman Says". Fox News.
  117. Nick Coleman (July 17, 2010). "Felons flipped an election? Unbelievable". Star Tribune. Retrieved July 22, 2010.
  118. "Hennepin County Sheriff's Office News Release: Voter fraud investigation" (PDF).
  119. Forliti, Amy (2010-10-28). "Hennepin Co. charges 47 cases of voter fraud". Pioneer Press. Retrieved 2015-05-02.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008.
Wikinews has related news: Minnesota court declares Franken winner; Coleman considers appeal
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 11/30/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.