Tetragonal trapezohedron
Tetragonal trapezohedron | |
---|---|
Click on picture for large version. | |
Type | trapezohedra |
Coxeter diagram | |
Faces | 8 kites |
Edges | 16 |
Vertices | 10 |
Face configuration | V4.3.3.3 |
Symmetry group | D4d, [2+,8], (2*4), order 16 |
Rotation group | D4, [2,4]+, (224), order 8 |
Dual polyhedron | Square antiprism |
Properties | convex, face-transitive |
The tetragonal trapezohedron or deltohedron is the second in an infinite series of face-uniform polyhedra which are dual to the antiprisms. It has eight faces which are congruent kites and is dual to the square antiprism.
In mesh generation
This shape has been used as a test case for hexahedral mesh generation,[1][2][3][4][5] simplifying an earlier test case of Rob Schneider in the form of a square pyramid with its boundary subdivided into 16 quadrilaterals. In this context the tetragonal trapezohedron has also been called the cubical octahedron,[3] quadrilateral octahedron,[4] or octagonal spindle,[5] because it has eight quadrilateral faces and is uniquely defined as a combinatorial polyhedron by that property.[3] Adding four cuboids to a mesh for the cubical octahedron would also give a mesh for Schneider's pyramid.[2] As a simply-connected polyhedron with an even number of quadrilateral faces, the cubical octahedron can be decomposed into topological cuboids with curved faces that meet face-to-face without subdividing the boundary quadrilaterals,[1][5][6] and an explicit mesh of this type has been constructed.[4] However, it is unclear whether a decomposition of this type can be obtained in which all the cuboids are convex polyhedra with flat faces.[1][5]
Related polyhedra
Family of trapezohedra V.n.3.3.3 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polyhedron | ||||||||||
Tiling | ||||||||||
Config. | V2.3.3.3 | V3.3.3.3 | V4.3.3.3 | V5.3.3.3 | V6.3.3.3 | V7.3.3.3 | V8.3.3.3 | ...V10.3.3.3 | ...V12.3.3.3 | ...V∞.3.3.3 |
The tetragonal trapezohedron is first in a series of dual snub polyhedra and tilings with face configuration V3.3.4.3.n.
4n2 symmetry mutations of snub tilings: 3.3.4.3.n | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symmetry 4n2 |
Spherical | Euclidean | Compact hyperbolic | Paracomp. | ||||
242 | 342 | 442 | 542 | 642 | 742 | 842 | ∞42 | |
Snub figures |
||||||||
Config. | 3.3.4.3.2 | 3.3.4.3.3 | 3.3.4.3.4 | 3.3.4.3.5 | 3.3.4.3.6 | 3.3.4.3.7 | 3.3.4.3.8 | 3.3.4.3.∞ |
Gyro figures |
||||||||
Config. | V3.3.4.3.2 | V3.3.4.3.3 | V3.3.4.3.4 | V3.3.4.3.5 | V3.3.4.3.6 | V3.3.4.3.7 | V3.3.4.3.8 | V3.3.4.3.∞ |
References
- 1 2 3 Eppstein, David (1996), "Linear complexity hexahedral mesh generation", Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SCG '96), New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 58–67, arXiv:cs/9809109, doi:10.1145/237218.237237, MR 1677595.
- 1 2 Mitchell, S. A. (1999), "The all-hex geode-template for conforming a diced tetrahedral mesh to any diced hexahedral mesh", Engineering with Computers, 15 (3): 228–235, doi:10.1007/s003660050018.
- 1 2 3 Schwartz, Alexander; Ziegler, Günter M. (2004), "Construction techniques for cubical complexes, odd cubical 4-polytopes, and prescribed dual manifolds", Experimental Mathematics, 13 (4): 385–413, MR 2118264.
- 1 2 3 Carbonera, Carlos D.; Shepherd, Jason F.; Shepherd, Jason F. (2006), "A constructive approach to constrained hexahedral mesh generation", Proceedings of the 15th International Meshing Roundtable, Berlin: Springer, pp. 435–452, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-34958-7_25.
- 1 2 3 4 Erickson, Jeff (2013), "Efficiently hex-meshing things with topology", Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG '13) (PDF), New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 37–46, doi:10.1145/2462356.2462403.
- ↑ Mitchell, Scott A. (1996), "A characterization of the quadrilateral meshes of a surface which admit a compatible hexahedral mesh of the enclosed volume", STACS 96: 13th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science Grenoble, France, February 22–24, 1996, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1046, Berlin: Springer, pp. 465–476, doi:10.1007/3-540-60922-9_38, MR 1462118.